Whether inertia can be quantified or not, and whether inertia is related to velocity

Yes! Any geometric or physical quantity as long as it can establish a double set between a mathematical quantity (such as force and vector), it can be considered that this quantity is measurable, if we use the coordinate system to find the length of a line segment, although the coordinate system can change, but the value obtained is not the same, the mass is the measure of the inertia of the object, in Newton's famous work "Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy", it is defined that mass can be obtained by the product of density and volume, representing the amount of matter, implied as a measure of the inertia of the object, There are even places in the book where the word mass is not used to write about the inertia of objects. (The direct translation in the original book is the quantity of matter, and the word mass in physics now agrees).

Inertia is no size! Inertia is when an object retains its original state and direction of motion without resistance. It has nothing to do with quantification.

Inertia can certainly be quantified.

The inertia of an object is only related to mass, and the magnitude of inertia is usually expressed in terms of the amount of mass, and the unit is also a unit of mass.

I think inertia is quantifiable because it is proportional to the mass of the object, it is a one-time function, and there is no other variable except the mass of the object, so it should be quantifiable.

We call the property that all objects have the property of maintaining a constant linear motion or a state of rest unchanged as inertia.

The important thing to understand is that the state is constant, i.e., inertia.

The greater the mass of the object, the greater the inertia.

The smaller the mass, the less inertia.

The magnitude of inertia is independent of the magnitude of velocity. It is only related to the mass of the object.

So the magnitude of inertia refers to the mass of the object.

The degree to which the object maintains its original velocity" is that when the object is at a constant speed or stationary, you give it an external force, the greater the mass of the object, you must use a lot of force to change its state, for example, a heavy truck and a toy car, you push them with the same force, obviously, you can only push the toy car, this is the reason for the large inertia of the object with a large mass, that is, the object with a large mass is not easy for you to change its state, for example, uniform linear motion and stationary, if you don't move it, It will always maintain its original state of motion (or stationary), and the magnitude of inertia refers to the degree to which it can maintain its own state of motion and the ability to resist interference.

Inertial bu can be quantified, he is not a physical quantity, it is a material property.

For example, if your clothes are red, can the color be quantified?

Suppose how to measure the mass of an object in an environment without gravity?

Therefore... Can it be said that inertia can be directly described by mass?

Note: Color is fully quantifiable.

Inertia is a fundamental property of motion.

Now science cannot calculate inertia. It's not that inertia can't be calculated, it's that science is wrong now.

Friend, let me tell someone, if there is "inertia", then inertia must be related to speed. Remember that it must be related.

In fact, there is no "inertia", and the word inertia is inherently wrong, so wrong that it cannot be justified.

Welcome friends who are interested in "inertia", welcome to come together**.

Compare inertia to other intrinsic properties such as hardness, which is independent of velocity and the same is true of inertia.

Inertia is represented by another synonym: stability, degree of state holding, difficulty of moving, difficulty of changing the state of movement. How to name it, it is always the most concise inertia, accept it.

It has nothing to do with it, inertia is only related to mass

The greater the mass, the greater the inertia.

Completely unrelated.

The only factor that determines the magnitude of an object's inertia is its mass.

Why does the bus brake need to be earlier or it brakes hard because of its mass and not because of its speed.

Inertia is only related to mass.

Inertia is related to the mass of an object. Inertia is a property of an object to keep its original state of motion unchanged, from another point of view: the difficulty of changing the state of motion of an object reflects the magnitude of the inertia of the object, the greater the mass of the object, the more difficult it is to change the state of motion, that is to say, the greater the mass, the greater the inertia.

It's all about quality.

Common misconception: Inertia is related to initial velocity. Note that (1) philosophy holds that mass increases with velocity.

2) In high school physics, the definition: inertia, that is, an inherent property that maintains the original state of an object, is manifested in two aspects:

First, when the object is in a state of stationary or uniform motion without change, it behaves"Maintain its original static or uniform motion state"；

Second, when the motion state of the object changes, it is manifested as "the difficulty of changing the motion state of the object", if it is easy to change the motion state, it means that the inertia is small, and vice versa, the inertia is large

The definition of inertia is the ability of an object to maintain its original state of motion, that is, it is determined by the speed of the object (the slower the change, the greater the inertia, otherwise vice versa), and the speed of the object is of course determined by acceleration. Under the action of the same force, it can be seen from Newton's second law that the greater the mass of the object, the smaller the acceleration, that is, the slower the change in the velocity of the object, the greater the ability of the object to maintain its original state of motion, that is, the greater the inertia of the object. Obviously, the inertia of an object is independent of the velocity, nor of the elements of the force experienced.

Inertia is related to the mass of an object.

It is only about the mass and the greater the mass the greater the inertia

Listen to Albert Einstein talk about the beginning of physics: the law of inertia.

No First, because the Higgs field is not effective against photons, all mass comes from the interaction of particles with the Higgs field Second, the speed of motion of all objects with inertia cannot reach the speed of light, so photons have no inertia.

No, this is one of the fundamental laws of the universe, just like the conservation of energy.

All we can do is take precautions to ensure that the consequences of inertia are avoided!

Where there is mass, there is inertia, so as long as there is mass, inertia will not be eliminated.

Hehe, there is nothing to say about this, as the folk saying goes, if you sneeze, someone is thinking about you, if the two are scolding you again. Three.,It doesn't seem like there's anything to say.。。

The scientific explanation is that bacteria enter your nasal cavity, and your nasal membranes resist it and sneeze!

2 people scold you, 3 you catch a cold--

This has no scientific basis, it is just for fun.

This is stated in accounting standards. Because there is a great fluctuation in fair value, if the two measurement methods are allowed to be converted at will, then the current profit may be artificially manipulated, so the accounting standards stipulate that once the fair value model is used to measure investment real estate, it cannot be transferred to the cost method of measurement in the later stage.

Of course not, first of all, whether the enterprise uses the cost method and the fair value measurement method is an accounting policy, once the accounting policy is determined, it cannot be changed at will, when the enterprise adopts the cost method, it is generally because the fair value cannot be reliably measured, and it is necessary to maintain due prudence. However, if fair value can be reliably measured, it is okay for enterprises to use fair value measurement, and the following is the key point, because when an enterprise uses fair value measurement, it will produce fair value change profit or loss, if it is fair value change income, the enterprise continues to use the fair value measurement method, and once the fair value change loss is changed to the cost method, it will not be messed up, because fair value change profit and loss affects pre-tax profit, and arbitrary changes will produce the phenomenon of artificially adjusting profits. The tax department is not a fool, and of course it will not let you change back.