If the Xiongnu and Mongolia coexist, who is the most powerful

The Xiongnu and the Mongols were originally ethnic groups living on the Mongolian plateau at different times, so it is impossible to talk about the condition of coexistence. This question is like asking who is the most powerful Jurchen or today's Northeast people, and there is no comparison.

Mongolia is even more powerful, the biggest difference between Mongolia and the Xiongnu is that Mongolia knows how to use the wisdom of other nations to develop, which is why Mongolia will rise so quickly. Mongolia uses a large number of craftsmen and strategists of the Han nationality, and there are many wisdom people of ethnic minorities, and Mongolia's engineering equipment Huihui cannon is the invention of the Hui people, so Mongolia takes into account the martial arts of the nomadic people and the technology and wisdom of the Han people, as well as a variety of unique advantages of a large number of ethnic minorities.

do you want your son to beat me ? I don't know, it should be Mongolia, but in fact, the name is different, Mongolia is the general name of the nomadic tribes (including many Turkic tribes, oai yin yrgd, etc.) that lived on the Mongolian plateau later. It's not the same people.

Inner Mongolia was the Xiongnu in ancient times. At that time, it was distributed in the southeast and west of the grassland, the Lamulun River and the Laoha River basin, which was Donghu.

A federation of tribes, distributed on Lake Baikal.

To the west and south of the Selenga River basin is Ding Zero.

A tribal alliance distributed in Yinshan.

The north and south, including the so-called Henan south of the Hetao and the Ordos grassland, are the Xiongnu tribal alliance. The later Xiongnu State was based on the Xiongnu tribal alliance, conquering the tribal alliance, tribes and other small countries of the Socks Bridge.

The Xiongnu is a nomadic people in the north of ancient China, rising in the foothills of Yinshan Mountain in Inner Mongolia today, they are clothed with left hair, according to the "Historical Records of the Xiongnu Biography" in the record, the Xiongnu, its ancestor Xia Hou's Miao descendants also, said Chun Sou Sanwei, Tang Yu above the mountain, the lynx, living in the northern barbarians, with the livestock and transfer, the Xiongnu in the ancient Chinese books leaked out of the fierce is the late Qin and early Han Dynasty to dominate the powerful nomadic people north of the Central Plains.

The Xiongnu did not refer to the Mongols.

The Xiongnu were a nomadic people who arose in the 3rd century BC and "lived in pursuit of water and grass". According to the "Historical Records: The Biography of the Huns", the Xiongnu, the descendants of their ancestor Xia Hou, are also called Chunwei.

The Xiongnu is the predecessor of Mongolia, the Mongolian nationality originated from the Mengwu Murwei, a branch of the Eastern Hu, and the Wuhuan and Xianbei tribes in the east of the Xiongnu are called "Donghu", and the oasis ethnic groups in the Western Regions west of the Xiongnu are called "Xihu". Therefore, the Xiongnu are the ancestors of the Mongolian people. Just like the ancient Huaxia and Chinese appellations, they both refer to China.

Be.

The Xiongnu are Mongols, which is due to the fact that the users of the slate tomb culture in central and eastern Mongolia may be the common ancestors of the Xiongnu and Donghu, both of whom belong to the North Asian type of the race, with homologous phylogies and close geographical ranges, and are culturally similar. But they were very far apart in time, and it cannot be said that the Huns were the direct ancestors of the Mongols. The Xiongnu is the predecessor of Mongolia, the Mongolian nationality originated from the Mengwu Murwei, a branch of the Eastern Hu, and the Wuhuan and Xianbei tribes in the east of the Xiongnu are called "Donghu", and the oasis ethnic groups in the Western Regions west of the Xiongnu are called "Xihu".

Therefore, the Xiongnu are the ancestors of the Mongolian people.

Be.

The Xiongnu are Mongols, which is due to the fact that the users of the slate tomb culture in central and eastern Mongolia may be the common ancestors of the Xiongnu and Donghu, both of whom belong to the North Asian type of the race, with homologous phylogies and close geographical ranges, and are culturally similar. However, they were far apart in terms of time and Luzhou, and it cannot be said that the Xiongnu were the direct ancestors of the Mongols. The Xiongnu is the predecessor of Mongolia, the Mongolian nationality originated from the Mengwu Murwei, a branch of the Eastern Hu, and the Wuhuan and Xianbei tribes in the east of the Xiongnu are called "Donghu", and the oasis ethnic groups in the Western Regions west of the Xiongnu are called "Xihu".

Therefore, the Xiongnu are the ancestors of the Mongolian people.

No. The Mongols are actually Donghu.

The descendants of the people, there were Xiongnu and Donghu people in the ancient grasslands, and the Xiongnu returned to the Min in the north and later went to Europe, so the remaining Donghu people were the later Mongols.

I think Mongolia is stronger.

The Mongol tactics were mounted archery, and neither race had any protection.

Whoever has the largest attack range has the advantage.

On the other hand, when it comes to martial arts, Mongolia's ability to fight on horseback is also second to none, and I have never heard of a country that can beat Mongolia on horseback.

In terms of combat record, Mongolia's foreign wars, not to mention winning a hundred battles, at least to destroy any country that has hardly been able to escape, and its hometown has never been captured.

Although the Xiongnu were able to deal with Liu Bang, they were finally disabled by Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty, and Huo Qubing also captured many relatives of the Xiongnu king in a surprise attack, and he could only bully the small tribes at ordinary times, and he did not see much territory laid by the Xiongnu.

When it comes to equipment, I don't think much progress has been made in metal smelting on the grassland, most of the people use leather armor, and the machetes of the Huns and Mongolians are not ranked on the historical weapons spectrum.

I can ** down, Mongolia first flew kites on the battlefield, shot the Huns a few rounds, and then a few people and horses charged in the middle of the other side, and then divided and surrounded, rushing to kill the lone enemy army. The loss ratio should be around one to five.

Let's look at the biology of the human being:

The world is divided into four major races, among them, the yellow race referred to in China is actually collectively referred to as the race in the world, but the main ethnic groups in the country are unwilling to admit it, which is a kind of narrow-minded psychology.

Mongoloids, or yellow people, have yellow complexion, straight hair, flat faces, flat noses, and wide nostrils;

Caucasoids or Caucasians. White, high, narrow nose, wide range of eye colors and hair types;

Negroid, or black, is black, with thick lips, a wide nose, and curly hair;

Australians (australoids) or brown people,** brown or chocolate color, brownish-black and curly hair, broad nose, well-developed beard and body hair.

Internationally, and even in Japan, scholars identify the Xiongnu as a Caucasian race, and in China, the Xiongnu are generally considered to be of the yellow race.

Let's compare strength and agility through people.

On your terms, 50% for each side

The Mongolian plateau has a harsh climate that is not suitable for human survival. So now this plateau is also a sparsely populated area. The harsh natural environment gave birth to barbarians, and the individual fighting of barbarians was also the most powerful.

Nomads are bold by nature and don't like to play tricks, but that doesn't mean they can't use tricks. From the contest and struggle with the steppe wolves from childhood, they learned mobility, dividing, encircling, looking for weak points, and concentrating superior forces. From the wolves, they learned a lot.

If you are stupid one-on-one, the nomads will never enter the Central Plains.

The Xiongnu won, because the Xiongnu did fight the Mongols, but the Mongols lost. This is to talk about the ancestors of Mongolia, Hu, Hu and Xiongnu fought and finally Hu had to leave the Mongolian steppe, and finally Mongolia occupied the Mongolian steppe. Of course, it was the Xiongnu who fought Hu first, and you have to ask why it was because of the same nomadic people.

Moreover, there are cattle and sheep in the grassland of Hu, so it is suitable for the Xiongnu to live. As for what the ancestors of the Xiongnu were, I don't know.

The Xiongnu coincided with the powerful Western Han Dynasty, and was finally dragged down by the strong-willed and eloquent Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty, and was forced to move westward. Mongolia had better luck to meet China big.

Who said that the Huns did not lay down a large territory, who said that he bullied the weak, the Huns fought Europe to a point where they could not be at peace, and even Rome did not dare to provoke him, you said that he bullied the weak? What a joke! Why was the Great Wall built!

Think about it! And you let Temujin try to fight the Han Dynasty!

For Westerners, they are all Satan.

Yes. The Xiongnu were a group of nomadic people in the ancient Mongolian desert and steppe, most of whom lived in the Gobi Desert, and originally established a state in Ordos, Mongolian Plateau. The Xiongnu were a nomadic tribe that arose around the 3rd century BC, and the Xiongnu state flourished from 209 BC to 128 BC.

Historically, Mongolia has been ruled by many ethnic groups such as the Xiongnu, Xianbei, Rouran, Turkic, and Khitan. In 1206, Genghis Khan established the Great Mongolian State. In 1271, his grandson, Kublai Khan, founded the Yuan dynasty.

The Turks are the descendants of the Xiongnu, that is, the current Turkish state (mostly belonging to the Turkic people), when the Han Dynasty drove the Xiongnu out of the desert, so that they could not gain a foothold, so they developed towards Europe, everywhere they went, corpses were everywhere, blood flowed like pillars, and the city was in ruins, (of course, women in Europe survived more, for physiological needs and reproduction, the Turkic tribe was formed) The former Roman Empire disappeared because of their threat, Later, the rise and expansion of the Ottoman Turkish Empire (a state founded by the Turkic people) wiped out the mighty Byzantine Empire, which promoted the Renaissance and opened the sea routes, which made the European countries slowly rise and become powerful, and also accelerated the decline of the Ottoman Turkish Empire. As for Mongolia, it is a descendant of Genghis Khan, and it has nothing to do with the previous two, when Genghis Khan drank the Masena River, there are many descendants in Europe and Russia (the Russian ethnic blood relationship is too mixed, there are Mongols, there are Huns, and Tatars, etc.). It is necessary to understand that at that time, in order to drive the Xiongnu out of the desert, China spent a considerable amount of national strength (manpower, financial resources), which can be said to have exhausted its national strength, and the national strength began to decline, which aggravated the decline of the Han Dynasty.

The Mongols are the descendants of the Huns, and they are pure-blooded Huns, just look at the appearance of the Mongols.

Judging from the current research on the DNA extracted from the archaeology of the Xiongnu, the Xiongnu and Mongolia have little to do with it.

There is a certain blood relationship, not an inheritance relationship. Xianbei totem wolf white deer, belonging to the Yellow Emperor Xuanyuan, the moon wolf. The Xiongnu were the Later Jin. Mongolia is Xianbei.