How contemporary college students correctly view the issue of ethnic assimilation should be no less

Assimilation refers to the phenomenon in which one people, or part of it, loses its national identity and becomes another.

According to the definition of national assimilation, we can express it by the formula "a+b=b".

The most important characteristic of national assimilation is that a nation or part of it loses its national consciousness and eventually identifies with another nation, and its members become part of another nation, abandoning their own national name and accepting and using the ethnic name of another nation. As a result of assimilation, new nations were not created, but the assimilated national community was expanded. There are two different paths to ethnic assimilation:

Natural assimilation vs. forced assimilation.

The fundamental criterion that distinguishes between natural and forced assimilation between ethnic groups is the use of political violence and the use of national privileges in the process of assimilation. Assimilation through violence and privilege is forced assimilation and a manifestation of national oppression. For example, after the Manchus entered the customs, they forced the Han people to shave their heads and change their clothes.

Natural assimilation, on the other hand, is imperceptible and naturally arises in the process of mutual interaction between various ethnic groups. Natural assimilation is generally manifested in the assimilation of advanced nations into backward nations, in which the advanced replace the backward, and the backward move closer to the advanced. For example, many nomadic peoples who came to dominate the Central Plains in Chinese history were eventually conquered by the Han culture and assimilated into the Han nationality.

Ethnic assimilation refers to the phenomenon of one ethnic group assimilating into another ethnic group under certain historical conditions. There are two kinds of ethnic assimilation in history. One is natural assimilation, which refers to the fact that a certain ethnic group is influenced by another ethnic group for a long period of time, gradually disappears its own national identity, and assimilates into another ethnic group.

This is a natural and progressive trend in historical folk exhibitions. The other is forced assimilation, which refers to the policy of national assimilation implemented by the reactionary rulers, such as forcing the oppressed nation to accept the language, writing, customs, and habits of the ruling nation, and changing its original national identity. x0dIf some of the Han people really immigrated to Persia, whether they can really assimilate the local ethnic groups depends on the specific situation.

In most cases, it should not be, because since it is an immigration, it is impossible for the vast majority of people to go, it may only be the behavior of some people, and the assimilation of most of them is a strong ethnic group with a large population to a relatively small population and a relatively backward culture. Isn't that the case in China? Many ethnic minorities have been sinicized to varying degrees, and this is the best verification.

Assimilation and integration cannot be used to describe it, because the realm or concept of assimilation and integration is to be realized and experienced, not to be seen.

If you always try to see a people or its culture from your own personal point of view, then that means you are always in opposition to it. In other words, you cannot assimilate and blend in with your own people or with other peoples. Because you always want to look at it and evaluate it, not to understand it and experience it.

You're a liberal arts student, huh! Rushing to graduate**?