A debate in the individual debate competition?

Writing a defense should be studied by four people together, with a sense of hierarchy and wholeness, and go deeper layer by layer. For example, your argument is that the individual is a part of the collective, and the goal is the same, and the interest is the sum of the shares, so the interests can be both.

Only under the premise that the general interests of the collective are guaranteed, can individuals obtain benefits (including many benefits, such as real money, reputation, and invisible personal perfection and promotion). Again, it's a trick: Acknowledging that individual and collective interests can be at odds with each other in some cases, but that their interests are still aligned from a long-term and sustainable perspective.

If the collective interest is harmed for the sake of individual interests, it will also lead to the failure of individual interests.

The collective achieves the individual, and we must first make it clear that the collective and the individual are indivisible, and the individual is one in relation to the collective. The concept is that the achievement is the meaningful acquisition. It is not limited to money and status, and other material things also have an intrinsic spiritual pursuit.

If the opposing side acknowledges this premise, we can begin to argue that the collective creates the environmental conditions of the era so that we have the space for individual beings to play and exert their status, and secondly, it is impossible for people to be born, and to know it, then the ability that we can learn and cultivate also comes from the collective. Extend the idea of collectivity to environmental matters and to the groups that help you, including the power of the state.

Debate Competition: Enterprise Achievement Employee Argument Self-Introduction: The Sky Achieves Flying Birds, Diving Achieves Fish Swimming, Our Opinion Enterprise Achieves Employees, Hello Everyone, I am a Debate, Sun Moumou, thank you Respect, judges, audiences, opponents Hello everyone! As the ancients said, "if the name is not right, the word is not right", and only by clearly defining the concept can we have a meaningful debate.

An enterprise refers to an economic organization established in accordance with the law, for the purpose of profit, engaged in commodities, production, operation and service activities, and with independent accounting. Employees are staff members and workers. There are many factors that contribute to the success of a business:

Excellent corporate culture, perfect management mechanism, harmonious working environment, and a platform for employee development.

The so-called first debater is actually to elicit a point of view from your team, so when you are done with the discussion, you have to summarize everyone's opinions, and then, during the debate, the first speech is to say why you think that the collective achieves the individual, so you still have to discuss it together!

Collectively, individual.

First of all, the collective provides a platform for individuals to play, and without a good platform, no matter how strong the individual ability, it is impossible to achieve good results. Secondly, the collective is a team, and individuals must have team spirit and cooperate sincerely with team members in order to achieve brilliant achievements. =

The so-called personal interests are the legitimate material and cultural interests that people obtain through honest labor and legal operation in the process of developing the overall interests of the society to maintain their personal life and work. Marxism has never denied legitimate personal interests, Marx said: "Everything that people struggle for is related to their interests."

Engels once pointed out that the goal of "socialism" is "to organize society in such a way that every member can freely develop and exert all his talents and strengths, and that the basic conditions of this society will not be endangered by this".At the same time, Marxism also holds that the realization of any individual interests is inseparable from a certain level of development of the productive forces and the objective foundation of the social, economic, and political system.

If we put aside this basis of reality and only talk about the so-called "self", we can only lead to idealistic "solipsism".

In fact, collective interests, as a collection of the interests of certain members of society, are essentially a unified whole in which the interests of each member are organically linked. In real life, no matter how subjectively an individual detachs himself from various relationships, he is always the product of these relationships in a social sense. From this point of view, no individual can be separated from society and the collective.

In the view of Marxism, an individual's activities in society and the collective are not only for others but also for himself, and the greater the value he provides to the collective and society, the faster his own development and progress, and the higher the degree of realization of his personal value and interests. This enlightens us that when selecting and establishing individual value goals, we must take into account the overall interests of the state, the collective, and the individual. It is in this sense that Comrade *** pointed out:

Under socialism, in the final analysis, individual interests and collective interests are united. ”