What do you think of the sentence There are no three views that are right or wrong, only three view

This sentence is changing the concept, of course, there should be a judgment of the three views is correct or not, but a universal standard of judgment is needed, for some things recognized by the whole society, such as equality between men and women, there are already judgment standards, it is very good to judge whether the three views are correct or not, and for some controversial things, it can only be said that the three views are not compatible.

I often see some people on Weibo always shouting that other people's three views are not correct, quite despise such a statement, I think from my own point of view, only the three views are not compatible, there is no three views are correct, because the vast majority of independent-minded people will think that their three views are correct.

Some people say that there is no right or wrong in the three views, only whether they are in harmony or not, which really refreshes my world view, for example, you are not allowed to defecate in public, but you can't help it, I am also everywhere, we are quite harmonious, but this is really immoral.

In fact, if you don't agree with the people around you, it's also very sad, you can choose to talk about the place where the three views are combined, if a person's three views are completely different from yours, she can't still be by your side, you can't play together, the people around you may just have a little different ideas, and the others should be okay.

Personally, I believe that the three views are two different concepts, and the three views are two people who have common or similar concepts and practices in seeing, evaluating, and dealing with things, and the three views are basically formed in accordance with the moral concepts agreed upon by most people in the current society.

The correct three views, not for the purpose of harming others as the premise, is correct, the three views must have a measuring stick, and those behaviors that have clearly harmed others, even if everyone thinks they are correct, that is just the combination of your three views, does not mean that the combination of the three views is right, the measure of the three views must say that objectively exists.

Personally, I think the first consideration of the three views is positive, if a person's three views are not correct, then I think this person has no need to get along, I personally think that the first thing to see is whether the person's three views are positive, rather than first looking at the three views are compatible.

We can't deny all the different three ** laws, many of the three views are particularly inconsistent with us, and they feel very wrong, but from some angles, not all the three views that do not match you, and your so-called crooked three views are wrong.

I think that as long as you don't have malicious intentions towards the world for no reason, don't blindly attribute all problems to others, and clearly understand the limitations of your own existence.

There is no right or wrong view, only the three views are incompatible, and your so-called crookedness is just different from you and not in line with the social trend.

The three views refer to people's world view, values, and outlook on life, and we will not talk about the specific meanings of these three views for the time being, but discuss them logically.

It is a "view", it must be manipulated by people's thoughts and spirits, and each different individual is different because of the inheritance of genes, the environment in which he lives, the things he experiences, the education he receives, and the way and angle he thinks, but no matter how big the specific difference is, it is the individual's view and understanding of xx, that is, the "view".

The so-called "positive" and "incorrect" are undoubtedly a kind of evaluative words. If it involves evaluation, there must be a standard. But is there a universal standard for this kind of "perception" (even if it is the same name, the same region)?

Or even to say, is it possible to achieve such a standard in the continuation?

Science, as a strict field, especially natural sciences, such as mathematics and physics, has various standards in their respective fields to test the correctness of theories, but do things like "views" exist axioms and theorems?

If so, then move on to the discussion: What are axioms in this field? Is it truly universal, even with certain prerequisites?

Who or what group of people raised the public grounds? How much has it been verified? In my opinion, there is no such axiom or theorem.

Once it involves the spiritual realm of human beings, with subjective elements, even if there is a "standard", it will not be the only standard, because there are no "two identical heads", no "two identical hearts", and no 7 billion people have the same thinking and opinions.

If not, then the "three views" and "whether they are right or not" cannot become a logical and smooth evaluation -- if there is no standard, it cannot be distinguished. The argument between what is right and what is not right is also illusory.

In the application, a certain A evaluates the three views of a certain B, which generally means that A recognizes the three views of B, so it is affirmed - positive, if it is not recognized, it will generally be said to be incorrect. In the case that A approves of B's three views, it is also divided into two types: either A thinks that B's three views are very consistent with his own three views, and the three views of both of them are said to be correct; Either way, although the three views of A and B are not exactly the same, A still recognizes the three views of B, which is also called "positive".

Obviously, in either case, A's recognition of B is the premise of the "positive" of the three views.

Therefore, a more rigorous statement should not be whether the three views are "correct" or "incorrect", but whether the three views are consistent with someone and whether they are recognized by the evaluator.

Disagreement is not knowing what the other person likes, when you are happy about something. Not only does the other person not feel happy for you, but shows disdain because they don't know about your pleasure and pursuit. If you like reading, traveling, sports, etc.

He might say that if he has time, he might as well clean up the house. The dissonance of the three points of view is manifested in the fact that you do not understand each other. When you want to be alone and calm down, he may feel that you are escaping reality and may even say that if you are in that mood, you might as well wash a few more clothes.

When you get your house in order, he might say just do it. Small things can start a quarrel. The disharmony of the three views is reflected in the education of future generations.

People with different perspectives have different views on parenting. For example, you want the other party to spend more time with your child and teach your child to learn more. He might say, child, you can learn by yourself, and if you don't learn, you owe a dozen.

These three views are not expressed in honoring elders. When you save some savings and want to be filial to your parents, he may be upset and even complain that your parents are not taking good care of their children.

Different people are always not on the same channel, and a simple thing can make people feel tired. People who do not agree with each other have unstable marriages and are prone to breakups. What are the manifestations of the disagreement between the three views of the two people, and how to judge the disagreement between the three views of the two people is mainly inappropriate, and all the ideas are opposite.

But that's not the most important thing. It's better to be willing to change and willing to give. There are no people in the world who think exactly the same way.

The most important thing is that neither of them will give in, which is actually a very bad state.

You always have a different idea about chatting, and that is the disagreement between the three views. You can like folk songs, he can like rock 'n' roll. None of these are implications, but if you can't put everything together, that's a big problem.

No matter what the other person does, you will feel very conspicuous. When you are with the other person, you always look at the other person's displeasure. No matter what the other person does, you will get bored.

I don't agree to spend money. Money is the most destructive thing. You feel that life should have a mood, but the other party feels that life is just firewood, rice, oil and salt, and the rest is a waste.

I think that if the three views do not coincide, don't be together as soon as possible, even if you are together, there will be a lot of contradictions, and you will eventually separate.

I think there is a big difference between the consumption concepts of two people, and there is also a big difference between two people for future development, and there is a certain difference between two people when they see a thing.

I don't understand a lot, but there are some contradictions in the way of behavior, lifestyle, love outlook, and values.

Personally, I feel that the three views do not agree that two people do not have a common language, and two people have completely different views on things, and two people cannot communicate well.

"Three incorrect views" refers to a person's ideological concepts, including values, outlook on life and world view, which are the basis of a person's code of conduct and decision-making standards, but if these concepts are not reasonable, it will lead to a decrease in behavioral habits and quality of life. The correct three views should guide a person's decision-making, cultivate correct habits and pre-valence values, so that a person's life and behavior can be correctly guided, so that a person can continue to develop and live happily in life. The correct three-touch pure view can also enhance a person's literacy in many aspects, help him better deal with problems, constantly learn new knowledge, cultivate social awareness, and play his role more favorably, so as to more vividly reflect his own value.

In short, to cultivate the correct three views, this is the only way for everyone to grow, but also the secret of success, only under the guidance of correct values, outlook on life and world view, can we go further.

The disagreement between the three views refers to the disagreement between the three views of world view, values, and outlook on life.

The manifestations of the disagreement of the three views are:

1. The biggest manifestation is that it is not suitable, you will find that even if this person is rich and handsome, kind-hearted, and helpful, the two of you will not get along.

2. People who do not agree with the three views have different consumption views, you feel that as long as the clothes look good, you can wear them, but the other party likes to wear high-end clothes with quality.

3. The manifestation of the disagreement between the three views is that both sides will not back down.

Are you like that?