Our Debate Topics In the debate competition, which is more important, the theoretical content or the

Let's look at today's debate, the content of academic theory is the content of academic theory, which is the essence of scientific principles and things. Obviously, the content of the doctrine is about the principles and opinions of the objective and subjective world, which are independent of the written language. Language skills refer to the superb skills in the use of language, mainly including speech and recitation, rhetoric and language logic.

Therefore, in the activity, which is dominated by language, debate can only be expressed through the way of language. The two are complementary and relatively independent, and the selection of skills depends on the debater's style of debate and the effect to be achieved, rather than on the content of the theory itself, and there is no so-called decisive relationship between content and form. And with the use of language, there must be a distinction between high and low skills.

As we see it, theoretical content and language skills are inseparable from debate. Debate has evolved into different forms and types over the long history of its change and development. Focusing on the distribution of economic benefits, it evolved into commercial negotiations; What focused on the search for true knowledge and the exchange of scholarship evolved into an academic seminar, while the focus on showcasing the charm of language and one's debating talent evolved into today's debate competition.

Mr. Jiang Changjian once said: "The debate competition is a competition that relies on the debater's skillful language skills to fully display his or her own position and viewpoint. It can be said that the essence of the debate tournament is broken.

In the following, we will argue our point of view from three negative aspects: purpose, process, and result. First of all, start from the purpose of the debate competition. In the debate competition, the determination of the topic and position are random, coupled with the limitations of the debater's personal knowledge, it is difficult for the debate competition to carry a large number of profound academic content, and the blind pursuit of academic enrichment also deviates from the original intention of the debate competition.

The most important purpose of the debate competition is not to disseminate scholarship, let alone to explore true knowledge, but, as Jiang Changjian pointed out, is to fully display some academic theories on a certain topic and a certain position. Since the purpose is to show, how to show well and how to show brilliantly depends mainly on the language skills of the debater. Secondly, watch the process of a game.

The competition is time-limited, which determines that it is difficult to have an excessively difficult and complex knowledge system and theoretical framework in the debate competition. Not to mention the participation of the audience, who usually lacks a systematic and rational understanding of the debate. Then, in order to conquer the judges and the audience in a competition of tens of minutes, the flexibility of language skills versus the certainty of the content of the theory will inevitably make the debater rely more on the language skills - to make the simple and simple theory become thorough and exciting, and the complex professional theory to become easy to understand.

Finally, look at the results. In an evenly matched debate competition, the winner is not determined by the profundity and richness of the theoretical content, but whether the debaters use exquisite language skills to present their views clearly and convince the judges and the audience. This is evidenced by the preponderance of fluency in language, persuasiveness, eloquence and a sense of humor, which are indicators of language skills.

To sum up, we believe that the debate competition should focus on language skills.

Summary. First of all, the most important point is to "stick to our point of view" whether what you say is right or not, even if it is not right, you must feel that it is right, even if you agree with the other party's point of view in your heart, you must deny it, deny the other party, and secondly, you should pay attention to listening, listen to the loopholes in the opponent's debate, and there is also to find more information, do not have to memorize it all, and remember the general meaning.

Debate Competition: Which is more important, knowledge or technology, we are: knowledge is more important than technology. Ask for some debating skills from all walks of life.

Hello, I have seen your question, and I am sorting out the answer, wait a while First of all, the most important thing in the world is to "stick to our point of view" whether what you say is right or not, even if it is not right, you must feel right, even if you agree with the other party's point of view in your heart, you must deny it, deny the other party, and secondly, you should pay attention to listening, listen to the loopholes in the opponent's debate, and there is also to find more information, do not have to memorize it all, and remember it about the meaning of the past year, when the free debate, If the other party asks a question, you have enough information in reserve, and it will not come out.

To be clear, debate is not a quarrel. I was a debater, and I was the champion of the whole school debate competition in my sophomore year, and I organized many college debate competitions and served as a judge. I don't appreciate the shrew's chatter like scolding the street, but think that you have to use logic and skill to win.

Logic lies in being able to use rational and in-depth thinking to analyze the debate from a different perspective, and skill lies in being able to deal with changes without being surprised when present.

At the beginning of taking over the debate, they should separate themselves to collect information and organize it. Many debate topics have been debated by others, and it is easy to find other people's debate process, or at least find similar debate topics. My habit is to go online with a bunch of information, and then take a two-colored pen and draw out the sentences that may become the arguments of both sides and think about it repeatedly, and the ideal effect is that I am debating the information myself.

Finally, I distilled a few aspects and organized them into my own arguments.

Then the second step is the teammate discussion. In terms of the management theory learned, this is called the brainstorming method. Everyone put forward their arguments together and discuss them, and the final summary of the arguments should be novel and general, three or four.

The level of general arguments is progressive, and I am more accustomed to the combination of arguments and national policies, current affairs, and so on. Also, it is combined with your own major, and there are several professional terms that everyone knows a little but don't know very well. Because our school is comprehensive, the competition is between colleges, so this trick is very effective.

A set of terms such as "opportunity cost" and "return on investment" can confuse both the other party and ......the judges

The third is to organize the material again according to the arguments. Try to make your arguments as noble and current as possible.

It's a good idea to be able to keep group discussions and debates with each other in the process of organizing the material. Discussions can deepen the issue and add material at any time. Exchange the sorted materials, and finally sort out your own defense.

It should be noted here that the argument must be deepened step by step, and the content of the argument is the same but the expression is different. People's arguments should be exchanged to ensure that they can cooperate in place.

Several of your own arguments must be stable, stick to the arguments, and don't follow the other party's train of thought when you play, otherwise you will forget your own things.

When making a statement, you should show a very confident appearance, look at the judges and the opposing opponent with a smile, and add beautiful gestures.

In a free debate, the time for each speech is limited to about a second. This requires the debater to have flexible thinking and a strong ability to generalize. Every time you speak, start from the point of view of your own argument.

If you encounter a problem that you can't answer, don't panic, just re-throw your argument again, and wait for the other party to bring up the question just now, haha, I guess I have already thought of the answer.

Free debate, if you have time left, don't waste it. Start with a debate and repeat your argument again in an orderly manner.

That's basically all for success.

Debating skills.

In the following article, we will try to combine the theory of techniques with the analysis of practical arguments to introduce several anti-customer techniques.

Donghua students, don't bring up all the topics!!

I am also a member of Tung Wah. Donghuadi teachers are all tied to hanging hair.

Khan, I'm also from Donghua. Super Cup Drip...

It's up to you which side you are.

1.The assumption is that listening and speaking skills are important:

Then you have to grasp the listening and speaking to debate, and to press the opposite of reading and writing, and a very simple example is to be able to write and read, and English is a language after all. Same as Chinese. It's for communication. Won't say. Do not understand. How to communicate?

2.Literacy and grammar are important.

If you are not familiar with grammar, it is useless to speak it. Because others can't understand what you're saying.

Almost two arguments are debated like this.

There is no debate about who is right and who is wrong. Hope that helps.

1.Bilaterality of debaters: Debates are bilateral activities, with at least two participants, and a single aspect can only be discussions.

2.The opposition of the argumentative viewpoint: the two sides have opposing views, or they are not, so that there is the possibility of debate, otherwise it is negotiation.

3.Rigor of argumentation: Only a debate that is logical can win, otherwise it can only be sophistry.

4.Purpose of the pursuit of truth: The purpose of debate is to pursue truth and reach consensus.

One. Basics 1The structure includes basic theories, link dismantling, type analysis, basic theories:

Definition Attitude Ability Organizational Dismantling: Argument Questioning Refuting the other party's point of view Summary 2Categorical Facts Debate Points:

Reviewing Data Measuring Data Evaluation Theory Policy Debate Points: Necessity Root Attribute Solving Ability Profit and Loss Ratio (Need to Root Solution) Value Debate Points: Follow Common Sense (Foundation), Pursue Resonance, Provide Guidance 3

Winning or losing, evaluation criteria, evaluation debate, or evaluation position, whiteboard principle, free heart test, scoring system, or voting system two. Core idea 1The debate should be inclusive and consultative, and we should fully explore the legitimacy of the views of both sides.

2.Construct our views on the premise of fully acknowledging the reasonableness of the other party's point of view. 3.

The reasonableness of accommodating the other side's point of view makes our point of view appear to be an improvement of the other side's point of view, so that the argument is more scrutiny-resistant, more resilient and inclusive. 4.If you do not recognize the reasonableness of the other party's point of view, it is easy to fall into the over-absolute nature of the point of view and be refuted.

This is also one of the means of setting a trap for the other side, and if the other side denies the full reasonableness of our point of view, it will greatly increase the other party's burden of argumentation. 5.Putting aside the debate, it's easier to convince the other side from the other side's point of view.

6.Use critical thinking. (Always keep an eye on whether the argument is well argued).