In reality, 5 Heavy Tiger Hunters 5 Tiger Kings VS 5 Pershing 5 Centurions Who will win?

Try it with the Hero Combo and you'll know the result. Although Pershing is specifically used to deal with the Tiger style, it is evaluated in terms of evaluation. It is still not as good as the tiger type, because the structure is simpler than the tiger type, and the protection ability is not as strong as the tiger type.

But the Tiger is always prone to problems, and it is difficult to repair, and its maneuverability is not as good as that of American armor. If it's an encounter. The German side will have a slight advantage, and if it is a tug-of-war, then the American side will be a little stronger.

I think the Tiger King side will lose. The biggest advantage of the German King Tiger tank is its high heavy armor defense, and the powerful firepower of the 88 guns equipped with it! However, the Tiger King side is the attacking side, although there is heavy armor, but this also means that the tank itself is too heavy and slow, and the terrain is a bridge, if the German tank is destroyed when crossing the bridge, then the tank behind it will not be able to cross.

I think the worst result is a stalemate between the two sides, but the Germans are the attackers, and if they fail to achieve the goal of the attack, the Germans are the losers. If the Germans were on the defending, I think the Germans would have won!

In fact, the quality of German soldiers is higher, but it was only later that the soldiers were depleted, and the indicators of the King Tiger tank were above the Pershing tank, and its disadvantage was that it was made finely, which was not conducive to large-scale production, and Germany failed, not the fault of the soldiers, let alone the fault of the King Tiger tank. In fact, 2 Pershing tanks are certainly no match for one King Tiger tank, and 5 to 1 is about the same.

This comparison doesn't make much sense, it's not a numbers game, it's not a product of a different era of blade vs. gun.

In the war, Pershing and King Tiger had their own wins and losses (King Tiger had bad power and Pershing armor was weak).

The Centurion 3 is a latecomer, not a product of an era, and the Black Panther is the most outstanding mid-tank of its era (compared to the T34, the Black Panther is Lamborghini vs. SUV. Oh no, no, don't touch me!! Stalin 2 was never given any advantage over the Germans because of the rough craftsmanship of the Soviets and the "proletarian" spiritual law.

Well? You say he has a high yield? Well, well, the Soviets were happily singing that "who will send us steel, iron, and oil for free?" If the Soviet Union really had the productive forces to kill German kimchi in the war, Roosevelt would have invited Hitler to his house for beer and discuss how to kill Stalin.

In the daytime plains, if you encounter an enemy, I believe that all tankers will want to sit in their cars, (they all believe that their cars can take each other out in seconds, otherwise what else are they going to fight?). ）

But I believe that the Tiger King is still the most reliable. Hey Americans, do you dare to drive a Ford and pretend to be my Audi? The Soviet village woman, is your tractor catching up with me? Well, British, aren't you supposed to stay in the pool with your lifebuoy?

The King Tiger has thick armor and strong firepower, and the Pershing has good mobility and good firepower.

The Tiger King is amazing, who said that Pershing maneuvered well, why didn't I feel that it maneuvered.

If only there was a best, what else would you play, just one tank.

In fact, each has its own strengths, and it mainly depends on how you use it, whether you use it well or not.

Tiger hunting is td Tiger King is ht different. Tiger Hunter 9J Car As a TD with excellent accuracy and good damage (- although not as high as 704, it is always higher than average) There is also a more reliable face that can carry Of course, TD is not to resist, it is to pit others.

Tiger King 8J HT (Heavy Tan) The Tiger King has a very good front of the whole body, and it is very capable of jumping, and the manual vibrator is the key. The head is good after modification, and the cannon inherits the fine tradition of the D series, and the precision damage is okay.

The Pershing medium tank, while excellent, is not in direct head-on clash with the above heavy tanks, and is not very comparable.

In terms of heavy tanks, the King Tiger and IS-3 are recommended, both of which are good in terms of comprehensive capabilities, with outstanding King Tiger protection and firepower, and IS-3 outstanding firepower and mobility. Some data show that the IS-3 is still the best comprehensive performance of the 8-level heavy tank, and even surpasses the Tiger King to a certain extent. As for the two heavy tanks in the United States, they are almost kept at a decent plane level, and there is nothing too prominent.

Therefore, the U.S. system did not begin to rise in a straight line until 103.

This one of the four thinks Pershing is the most powerful.

The eighth-class car as a whole carries the three and 34 best.

Look at the Gulf War, you know, look at how the M1A1 abuses the T72 M1A1 uses oil-poor armor, King Tiger tank homogeneous steel.

In terms of defense, it can be imagined that the M1A1 uses a 125 mm rifled gun, and the Tiger King that the M1A1 can fire guided projectiles, electronic equipment, optical instruments, and maneuverability, too much, and it is not at the same level at all, and the difference is half a century, and it cannot be compared Defensive warfare 1 M1A1 abuses 20 Tiger Kings Offensive battles 1 M1A1 abuses 10 Tiger Kings The most conservative estimate.

There is no way to fight at all, and in an ordinary environment, it must be under strong other cover before it is possible to achieve the possibility of fighting.

From the point of view, range, mobility, protection and communication are all M1A1 has an absolute advantage, especially the night vision system of M1A1, which can make the Tiger King come and kill as much as he wants.

It's too far away to compare. The result of so many years of technological development is that the M1 can easily penetrate and destroy the German Tiger from any angle within the effective range, and the Tiger cannot shake the main armor of the M1 at close range.

The Tiger King is compared to Pershing, and M1A1 is compared to the Leopard 2 You say that the Tiger King is better than the Leopard 2.