Why are some highly educated people still so unqualified?

<>First of all, cultivation and quality are two concepts that seem to be the same, but they are completely different in nature! Accomplishment refers to the way a person treats others after reaching a certain state of affairs that he or she learns through his own efforts, then improves, and reaches a certain state, which not only needs to be learned, but also needs to be cultivated and cultivated; The definition of quality is more complicated! It includes five aspects of a person's knowledge, ability, volitional quality, aesthetic sentiment and behavioral norms, and it is the sum of a person's performance from the outside in (reading, experiencing) and then internalizing (absorbing, thinking) from the inside out!

Today's universities are no longer the universities they used to be.

Now in college, 20% of them actually go to school, and the rest are basically just to consume.

Don't say that many majors don't know what professional courses are at all, even if there are some highly professional disciplines, professional exams are also a common practice of cheating, or the teacher points out the key points and passes the test in the mix.

By the time I was in my junior year, I was looking for a job. The school spends much less energy on training students to find a job than on actually cultivating students to study (of course, not those famous brands or key universities), and students go to college, that is, they get a certificate, and then use this certificate to go to the street to find a job.

So, now you know. The so-called access to higher education.

That's the process. It's better to learn the craft from the master.

We still need to recognize that the majority of people with higher education have higher cultivation and quality than those who do not have higher education. The reason why there is a situation where the cultivation and quality of some highly educated people are not high is generally due to the following points:

1. Related to bad experiences. Confession.

I agree with the idea that human nature is the coexistence of good and evil. Although everyone has different degrees of good and evil by nature, there are always good and evil. At this time, unless the degree of his innate goodness absolutely overrides the evil nature, since childhood, the personal bad experience (such as:

Speculative exploitation at a young age is praised by parents, parents often speak ill of each other, there are students in school who bully the weak or teachers have no teaching ethics, or other vicious incidents that happen around them) because they are personal experiences and thus leave Marxism psychologically.

The shadow that cannot be changed, and then affects values, world view, and outlook on life.

of the formation. And a person's views on the meaning of life formed since childhood often become a person's lifelong and fundamental principles and concepts. As a result, China will leave behind proverbs such as "three years old is big, seven years old is old".

If the degree of the person's innate evil outweighs the degree of goodness. Then I don't need to explain.

Sometimes the quality of people and education does not have much to do with it, the quality is reflected in personal cultivation and moral level, and education only proves that you have learned knowledge, but it does not necessarily mean that the person has quality and morality.

They are only highly educated in terms of knowledge, but not in terms of quality, and their personal quality is very poor.

Higher education mainly focuses on cultural knowledge and skills, and the education of people's moral quality is still relatively scarce, but the moral quality of most people is still very good.

It may be because of family education, I haven't developed good habits since I was a child, and it is difficult to change them in my education when I grow up. It is also possible that the three views are different and there is a conflict in terms of concepts.

Personal quality refers to a person's ideological character. Higher education refers to the high level of education of people. Colleges and universities teach and educate people, but the formation of a person's character is affected by many aspects.

No. People with higher education only have a high amount of knowledge and professional knowledge, but it does not mean that they must be excellent in terms of morality.

Higher education does not mean that there is quality, but relatively speaking, those with higher education are more likely to be qualified.

Higher education doesn't necessarily mean quality, but at least they appear to be quality.

Many people will think that the quality of readers will be higher, after all, they have been exposed to school education for so many years, and some people have a particularly strong learning ability, and the school they are admitted to is very good. However, the news that appears in society always subverts people's concepts, and there are some people who have received higher education, and the quality is very poor, and there are even thefts. So why can't the quality of education be improved even though it has been exposed for so long?

The evaluation of higher education mainly depends on the learning ability and level of students, and does not judge the morality and quality of students. Moreover, most people do things in a more secretive way, and there are no obvious moral problems that can be seen, so naturally they will stay in the system of higher education, and will not be screened out by the evaluation system of higher education. Most of the people with poor quality in the news are all kinds of bad behaviors after leaving the campus, and these people do not cross the line on campus.

Campus social relations are relatively simple, once you make a mistake, it is easy to cause a devastating blow to your reputation, so even those who are not of high quality will restrain their behavior on campus, but once they come to society, they will show their own feet.

Self-education and self-learning ability is an important criterion for a person's long-term development, those who can enter higher education may have a very strong self-learning ability, but if there is a situation of low quality, it means that the self-education ability is very poor. Even if these people have already done the low-quality behaviors they have learned, they will not feel ashamed and will correct their behavior. But when you grow up, you can't always let teachers educate you, so the problem is still with yourself.

Don't discriminate on academic qualifications, and don't have color labels. Looking at others who think that the quality of people who receive higher education is good, we should still look at people by their true behavior and conduct, and don't be confused by external disguises.

Because there are many people whose three views are not very correct, their moral character is not very good, and they are not very kind, so this situation will occur.

It may be because although they have received higher education, they have not received quality education and moral education, so their quality and morality are not high at all.

Although they have received higher education, there are some people whose essence cannot be changed and are very selfish, so their quality is still not high.

Preface: If you have received higher education, it means that you have a very wide range of knowledge, but it does not mean that you are of high quality. We can find that some graduate and doctoral students, after graduation, choose to steal vegetables because they can't find a job, which is very sad.

We can't think that higher education is directly proportional to high quality, and if we want to raise a high-quality child, then parents need more guidance.

In the first 20 years of a student's career, the main task is to learn. They only need to sit at their desks and study for eight hours a day. There are many students who often study for more than ten hours because eight hours of study is not enough, so they will neglect their physical and mental growth.

If you study regularly, although your grades have improved, it does not mean that the quality of your students has also improved.

In our daily lives, we really like to socialize with polite children. They have a sweet mouth and will take the initiative to say hello. But we can't say that his academic performance is necessarily very good.

There are some children with high quality and good academic performance, but there are also some people with poor academic performance and low quality. In the matter of student quality, I think the most important thing is the education of parents, if parents educate their children to become sensible and polite people, then the quality of children will also improve. If parents blindly care about the student's performance, regardless of the quality of the child, the child's quality is likely to be low.

A person's qualities are very important and can often reflect a person's emotional intelligence. When I was in college, I was mainly exposed to the learning of knowledge, and I did not take the initiative to receive quality education. Although we can't learn in school, we still have to learn when we go out of society.

Some low-quality people are often spurned by society, and under the pressure of society, to be a high-quality person, we can criticize and educate these low-quality people when we see them.

Although it is said that they have received higher education, none of these people have a particularly good absorption, nor do they have a particularly good study, so it seems that the quality is not very high.

Because there is no education in this area during the university period, there will be different educational policies, so the quality of the students is not very high.

Because in the process of receiving education, quality education is not paid attention to at all, so the quality of college students is not high, which is also relatively normal.

Because schools do not pay attention to children's personal morality, they sometimes ignore quality education. That's what happens.

Education improves people's ability to learn and enables them to learn more about the world. Most of what is learned in school is the basic skills and means to further understand society. It is only by learning these that people can have the opportunity to learn and understand this society better.

Second, opportunities are often reserved for well-educated people. Recruiters tend to believe that highly educated people are smart, and that they are able to handle their jobs and adapt quickly to the work environment. That's why educated people always get a good job.

Thirdly, the more knowledge a person learns, the more humble and polite he will become. Learned people may think that they are not good enough at learning, so they will learn with the utmost patience. They often try to find solutions to problems based on what they have learned or seen.

Some have higher education.

However, there is still no correct three views and ability cultivation quality, which I think is also a very normal thing. In fact, there is no special necessary connection between the two. In the eyes of many people, the higher the level of education, the higher the level of personal cultivation, moral quality, and all aspects will be.

But there is an exception.

Exist. Whether we start from the TV series or from the circle around us, sometimes we can always hear that someone went to 211 and 985 schools, but in the end he went astray because of a trick and finally became a prisoner. There are many such examples, so let's take a look at why there is not necessarily an equivalence between higher education and the correct three views and high-level ability cultivation.

First, let's take a lookA person goes to a good university, even gets admitted to graduate school, goes to a doctorate, not only receives a very good higher education, but also ends up with an enviable job. What does all this mean? This can only show that this person has a high IQ and has a relatively good level of talent, so that he was able to make achievements in academics and was able to have a high level of education.

Of course, a large number of them also have high emotional intelligence, but there are also some people who just have a high IQ.

Secondly, the correct three views, good personal cultivation and quality, what do we use to measure these, is there a specific standard, or like going on to higher education, take an exam? No, to measure whether a person's three views are correct and the level of cultivation is constantly observed and discovered from interpersonal interactions with him. It is summarized and evaluated from a person's speech and behavior, and from what he does.

This requires a long period of time and energy, and the so-called "seeing people's hearts over time" is the truth. Therefore, these things are biased towards the quality of emotional intelligence, and if one wants to hide it, it can even be disguised. This is the usual modus operandi of many high-IQ criminals.

In the end, the reason for the asymmetry between the two is largely reflected in this person'sMental healthhorizontally. Because of family factors, childhood shadows, social background, life experience and other factors, a person's psychology has been in an unhealthy or even distorted transformation for a long time, and over time he has developed various ideas that are not conducive to others and himself, and finally put them into action, reflecting the asymmetry between the two. We can find from many cases that people who are not equal to the two are more likely to make mistakes, commit crimes, and eventually go to the road of no return.

Mainly because many schools now only pay attention to students' scores, but not to the quality of students, so there will be such people.

The main reason is that many schools do not pay attention to the quality education of students at all, so some people have good grades but poor quality.

This is because people who have received higher education are only rote memorization of filled knowledge, and have not learned quality education, and their three views are still very poor, impolite, and have no moral quality.

Higher education is like a huge net, and there will always be fish that slip through the net.

We should never think that a higher education is the same as a good upbringing. Because whether in life or in TV dramas, there will always be some people who are highly educated but uneducated. This phenomenon is no longer a strange thing, so it is really true that "higher education is not the same as education".

First, the difference between "higher education" and "upbringing".

Higher education

The so-called higher education, that isIt refers to receiving a higher level of education, higher training, and higher level of learning, which can be said to be the process of improving the level of personal knowledge. Just like when we go to college, both the first and second universities have senior professors to teach classes, which is also a way for us to get higher education.

Upbringing

Upbringing mainly refers to a person's literacy, which is manifested in various aspects such as language, behavior, actions, and behavior. The so-called good upbringing is, first of all, to be polite to others, to show respect to others, and to always have a kind heart and many other good qualities and behaviors. A person's upbringing is often directly related to his or her family, just like "there is a father must have a son", because children are affected by the family from birth to growth, so often a person's family education is good or not can also determine whether the individual's upbringing is good.

Second, why higher education is not the same as being educated

Because the nature of the two is different.

The front is already forThe nature of the two is made to compare, so we can find out by comparisonOne is the education that comes from the school and other environments, and the other is the education that comes from the family and self。So the two cannot be equated.

The two cannot be causal.

We cannot say that a highly educated person is necessarily well educated. Because everyone's ability to learn is differentEven if they have learned a better level of knowledge and are highly educated, they may not have a good upbringing.

Take a chestnut:We've heard of people who are students in higher education and have higher education, but in the end they find outGraduation ** is plagiarized。Then we find that he has a higher education but there is a phenomenon of plagiarism, which is a poor upbringing, and educated people do not cheat.

The improvement of higher education is not the improvement of upbringing.

A person even has a higher education,But if their hearts are not changed, then their upbringing will not be well developed.

Here's an example:A very popular movie, "Young You", there is a person in it calledWei Lai's schoolgirl, she is the main force of school violence, that is, she bullies students, then of course we know that this is a lack of good upbringing. But he got a higher educationAt the top of her class, although her grades are excellent, her upbringing is extremely poor.

In general, we need to understand the difference between higher education and liberal arts, so that we can better understand that higher education does not necessarily produce well-educated people.