Sixth grade debate, I m the opposite!!!!!!!! No understanding

The counter should be unfavorable:

Primary school students are not very nervous about learning, they can be conducive to these spare time to do more useful extracurricular activities or sports, now the college entrance examination physical education will account for 50 points, not to mention that we have to achieve physical and mental all-round development, if too much extracurricular tutoring classes, and they don't like it, not only waste money, waste time, more likely to extinguish their talent in a certain aspect.

In addition, today's primary school students are learning to learn and learn every day, which has wiped out the children's playful and curious nature, so parents should take their children out for a walk, enjoy the beautiful scenery of our motherland, cultivate children's observation, and exercise their independent ability.

After all, a person needs not only knowledge but also his own social ability to enter society. Therefore, the participation of primary school students in extracurricular tutoring classes is not conducive to the growth of students, and it is more likely to bring them excessive competitive pressure.

The point of the debate for the audience and the judges is to make them understand and understand what you are saying, so don't speak at the right pace and be concise and to the point.

According to your statement, you should be asking for a counter-argument of "whether the life of the ugly duckling continues to be an ugly duckling or a white swan". So, I will briefly state my views from the position of the opposing side, and you still have to take the time to collect specific examples, after all, debate is a matter of accumulation.

In terms of the physiological characteristics of the ugly duckling, the ugly duckling itself is a white swan, and it should continue to live the life of a white swan.

The white swan is a migratory bird that lives mainly in reedy lakes, reservoirs, and ponds. With a migratory habit, it can escape the cold and pursue a warm life like spring. Live your life freely.

However, after ducks are raised by humans, they lose their ability to migrate, and some domestic ducks even lose the ability to hatch eggs. Their freedom has been limited by human beings, and their nature of pursuing freedom has been enslaved to resignation, is the ugly duckling still willing to be a duck that has lost its freedom?

While most ducks only pair up during the breeding season, the swans do pair for life, holding the hand of their children and growing old with them, which is a symbol of steadfast love. Excuse me, would the ugly duckling be willing to marry a duck just to breed offspring, or would it rather be married to a white swan that is both good-looking and determined? Even if the ugly duckling doesn't think about itself, it has to think about its own offspring.

To sum up, we firmly believe that the ugly duckling should continue to be a white swan with freedom and love.

Start by saying, "Thank you, Chairman, the other party, everyone." ”

If you are a white swan, "a soldier who doesn't want to be a general is not a good soldier", and everyone should have pursuits, not inaction. White swan, you can turn it into an ideal and a pursuit, it's easier to say. Even if you are not beautiful, you cannot lose the spirit of pursuing beauty.

As the saying goes, "Water flows low, people go high!" "To be a human being, of course, is to go to a high place.

There is also "sailing against the current, if you don't advance, you will retreat!" "If you don't work hard and stop moving, how can an ugly duckling become an ugly duckling when it's still an egg? It can only shrink into a small eggshell and slowly disappear!

Therefore, our point of view "the life of the ugly duckling is to be a white swan" is the king!

This is usually the opening argument of a debate, and you must make your point of view at the beginning and present your own arguments! It's best to cut off the other party's roots in the first place! It also gives a good first impression to the judges.

As for. Second, third, and fourth arguments, you should tell the other party how many arguments I am the opponent of, what is it called. (This is what I said when I first appeared, and I won't need it later.) Refute the loopholes in the other side's point of view and give arguments to bring down the other person's point of view!

It is recommended to take a look at the annual college student debate tournament, remember that there are similar themes in it, you can refer to it!

Hope it works for you!

Tennis racket: Yuan.

Equation: Solve each tennis ball x-element.

65x+2x=

67x=x=65 yuan.

1.Tennis racket: Yuan.

Equation: Solve each tennis ball x-element.

65x+2x=

67x=x=65 yuan.

Supplement: 1. Kilometers (A has walked more kilometers than B, that is, 7 hours, kilometers for hours, and the speed per hour is kilometers, and the total distance is 63 * kilometers).

2. 11+15 x4-9=95 km.

3. Cubic meters = 900 liters.

Choose me the best, thank you.

Yuan.

1. Does car B return the same way?

2. 11+15 x4-9=95 km.

3. Cubic meters = 900 liters.

A tennis racket costs 65 times the price of a tennis ball, which means that you can buy 65 tennis balls by buying a tennis racket.

Li Ming bought a tennis racket and two tennis balls, which is equivalent to buying a total of 65 + 2 = 67 tennis balls, so each tennis ball is yuan.

Tennis rackets for.

Solution: Set each tennis ball to be x-yuan.

65x+2x=

Solution: x=The price of a tennis racket: 65 yuan).

Solution: Let a tennis ball be X yuan, and a tennis racket will be 65X yuan.

65x+2x=

67x=x=65x=

A: Each tennis racket is 247 yuan.