It is taboo to change jobs frequently in the workplace, do you know why?

The workplace does not really give employees enough sense of belonging, security and comfort, and state-owned enterprises have done a better job in terms of belonging and security, but many enterprises do not have much comfort. Without a sense of comfort, in turn, employees' feelings of belonging and security will be blurred, or easily diluted, or employees will think that it is not the enterprise that is giving away, nor is the enterprise really want to give, but the result of the enterprise being constrained by the system and having no way to do it.

According to the law of "reciprocity", since the enterprise does not really regard the employees as family members, the employees naturally do not regard the enterprise as their home, and they do not "be", and there is no problem of loyalty or disloyalty. Private enterprises are not doing well enough in terms of belonging, security and comfort, and there are not many companies that have done well, and private enterprises that are truly good have not yet been seen. Because many private enterprises do not even have confidence in whether their enterprises can benefit the market for a long time, or have no plans to stand in the market for a long time, or have plans, and do not have a large enough pattern and ability to support, then private enterprises do not have excess energy to consider the ownership of employees and other issues.

Whether employees are loyal to the enterprise or not, first of all, depends on whether the company regards employees as family members, if the company does not, employees frequently change jobs can not talk about loyalty or disloyalty to the enterprise. In addition, the normal flow of talents is also respected by the society, and it is normal to change jobs for various reasons. This society can never escape the law of 28, I think I should fight for my family, and then I want to be more stable for my children, so the requirements for work are different in different periods.

Some people change jobs really and jump higher and higher, and some people jump jobs in order to choose to escape. It is too hypocritical to say that loyalty is too hypocritical, that work is first for oneself, and then for the boss, or more precisely, we are only working for the boss, and then the boss gives the corresponding remuneration in exchange. A company has a strict hierarchy, the position level has not reached a certain level, it is difficult for ordinary people to enter the boss's sight, even the boss's side can not be touched, you know the boss The boss does not know you, and you have not entered a company or department core organization, you are not qualified to talk about loyalty.

Because this practice will affect our reputation in this industry, and if you change jobs frequently, then many company bosses think that a person like you is a very unstable person and generally will not consider it.

Because the new unit will consult the work experience, and find that this person likes to change jobs, he will not be reused and cannot be trusted.

You don't stay in each company for a long time, you don't know what the specific process of the company is, and you don't have a certain amount of work experience.

Know. Because this will make the new company feel uneasy about you, afraid that you will leave at any time and will not admit you.

Because the company will not choose to hire people who are unstable, it will bring losses to the company.

Because if you change jobs frequently, you will not be able to adapt to the work, and your work status will become very poor, and you will not have a better development.

Because if you change jobs frequently, the company will feel that you are an unstable person and have no ability to work.

It's because frequent job hopping is not a good thing for me, and I won't save any savings by always changing jobs.

Because frequent job hopping will make your boss think that you are a very unstable person with a job, and you don't have any insistence on work.

Because if you change jobs frequently, many companies will look down on you, and they will also think that you are a person with low vision, which will have a serious impact on your career.

Many people in the workplace know that frequent job hopping can be said to be a taboo in the workplace, and it stands to reason that job hopping usually means jumping to a better company, isn't it good to jump ship frequently? But in fact, this is not the case, so I will give you a brief explanation of why it is taboo to change jobs in the workplace:

After entering the workplace, everyone's time and energy are very valuable. Success can only be achieved by constantly studying in an industry and field. And frequent job hopping means that your perception of yourself and the direction of your future development are relatively vague and unclear.

This will waste your time and energy, which will hinder your progress and development in the workplace. When everyone begins to impact the company's management, you may still be the lowest employee in a company because you have just jumped ship, and the gap will suddenly widen, and you will lose yourself at that time.

The reason why frequent job hopping is taboo in the workplace is that frequent job hopping is generally more difficult to re-employ, and general companies do not like employees who frequently change jobs. The second is to waste your time and energy in vain, and it is difficult to have the opportunity to settle down and improve yourself seriously in the job hopping.

Some units have low wages, poor treatment, or leadership personality problems, resulting in employees unable to stay for a long time, it has become an iron-clad camp running water disease, confused people come, come in and see, understand, I'll go! Employees of such a unit naturally change jobs frequently.

There are some units that do not need skilled workers, it hopes that through the continuous flow of personnel, and finally precipitate the most suitable employees, this situation has been recruiting, has been leaving, sometimes, the leader does not know what kind of employees they want, what the future development of the unit will become, just like this.

There are some employees who think that other units are better, and the salary is higher once they change jobs, so they keep changing jobs and keep finding that the current unit is not good, and I left! Actually, which unit is okay? Some job hopping is cost-effective, while some job hopping is unnecessary, which is really not easy to generalize.

In a healthy market economy environment, frequent job hopping is a very normal phenomenon, if the number of job hopping of employees in the market becomes less, it can only mean that the economic environment is not good, there are few job opportunities in the society, and the unemployment rate tends to be high. If the number of employee job hopping is at a very low level, it can be judged that the market is unhealthy, similar to the market environment before the reform of China's state-owned enterprises, when the employee turnover rate was less than 1%, and many people worked in one position for a lifetime, and at that time, the average American changed jobs 14 times in a lifetime.

At present, most of the job-hopping behaviors in the workplace occur in some low-threshold jobs, and most of the functions of the working environment and work remuneration that such positions can provide meet the first level of Maslow's needs theory, that is, physiological needs, such as diet, housing, sleep, etc. The pursuit of a higher level of demand is human nature, such as pension, travel, insurance, etc., when the current job can not meet their higher needs, job-hopping is almost inevitable, as for whether it can be achieved after job-hopping is another matter.

Relatively speaking, the number of job hopping in some high-level positions in the society will be significantly less, such as the leadership positions of some ** departments, and it is rare to hear of which director will take the initiative to resign and change jobs, because his current position can well meet his Maslow's needs.

Frequent job hopping is a normal part of a healthy market environment, as almost everyone will have a higher level of Maslow's needs.

This is because many bosses will think that frequent job-hopping people are disloyal to the company, so they will not hire them.

The main reason is that the industry circle you are in is so big, and if you change jobs frequently, you will be blacked out by the entire industry.

Channel job hopping looks like it, it's definitely not like it for the boss, but how many opportunities for growth and personal improvement are there in a company? Good positions are the boss's cronies or backbones, if you are always a company, you will always be that position, the boss hopes that you can do anything, willing to do it, do it well, and can't have too many requirements! Employees want to have the ability to improve their long wages and change their lives!

It's fundamentally opposite! How is it possible for one company to meet all of them? The so-called man moves the living tree to death!

Yes, there is no way to change jobs frequently and not make money