What is the effect of the author of the article using two inferior in a row

Updated on culture 2024-03-02
3 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    1. SenseTime. Cutting Xia Ji, Xia Ji lost his way and had little help, and Shang Tang got a lot of help. Shang Dynasty.

    The soup crusade against the Xia Dynasty.

    The Ji of the Xia Dynasty has no morality, and no one helps her, and the Tang of the Shang Dynasty has morality, and there are many people who help him. 2, Zhou Wu Wang Ji Fa.

    Cutting down the merchants, the king of the merchants lost his way and had little help. When Ji Fa, the king of Zhou Wu, crusaded against the Shang Dynasty, the Shang Dynasty had no morality, so no one helped him, and Ji Fa was just the opposite. 3. In 209 BC, Qin II lost his way and was helpless, and Chen Sheng and Wu Guang were helped.

    In 209 BC, Qin II Huhai.

    There is no morality, no one helps him, Chen Sheng and Wu Guang have morality, and there are many people to help them.

    There is much help for the righteous, and little help for the unjust", may I ask if its central idea is people.

    There is a lot of help for the righteous, and little help for the unjust, and the omen of hunger comes from "Mencius: Gongsun Chouxia", which refers to standing on the side of justice, benevolence and righteousness, and will get the support and help of the majority; If we violate morality and benevolence, we will inevitably fall into isolation.

    The article compares the "time", "location" and "people", and progresses layer by layer. It proves the truth that "the time is not as good as the earth, and the place is not as good as the people".

    The author proposes that the central argument is composed of the comparison of time, place, and people. The two "inferior" in the middle are connected, indicating a progressive relationship, and one is more important than the other. Putting forward an argument in this way makes the point of view even more clear.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    There is much help for the righteous, but little help for the unjust", from "Mencius, Gongsun Chou Shang", which refers to standing in terms of justice and benevolence, and will get the support and help of the majority; If we violate morality and benevolence, we will inevitably fall into isolation.

    We usually use the phrase "there is much help for the righteous, but little help for the unjust" to express that those who are righteous will receive support and help in many ways, and those who violate justice will fall into a situation of isolation and helplessness. Here, we understand "Tao" as "righteousness."

    So, what is "justice"? The Modern Chinese Dictionary says: "justice" refers to "the principle of justice and benefit to the people".

    It's a modern interpretation, but it's in line with its original meaning.

    Extended information: "The righteous are helped, and the unrighteous are helped" is a famous assertion of Mencius. "Mencius: Gongsun Chouxia" said:

    Those who have attained the Tao have much help, and those who have lost the Tao have little help. The widow is helpless, and the relatives are beside them; If you help more, the world will follow it. With the world's obedience, attack the relatives of the side, so the gentleman does not fight, the battle will be won.

    The word "pan" here is the word "rebellion", which means betrayal and opposition. This passage is to say that to those who have attained the word, there will be many people who help him. For those who have lost their ways, there are few people who help them. When the number of people he helped was so small that even his relatives would oppose him; When the number of people who help him is extremely large, the whole world will obey him.

    Take the power of obedience from all the world to attack those who are opposed even by their relatives, or they will win a battle without a fight.

    The people who Mencius said here about "attaining the Tao" and "losing the Tao" do not refer to ordinary individuals, but to the kings of a country. The king of a country is both the commander-in-chief of the war and the political leader. By discussing the question of victory or defeat in war, Mencius led to the idea that "there is much help for the unrighteous and little help for the unjust", but in Mencius's view, "the people's will to turn their backs" is of fundamental significance for war, and it is also of equal importance for politics.

    Mencius said: "There is a way to win the world: to win the people, to win the world; There is a way to win the people:

    Win their hearts, win the people. This means that to win the world, you must first win the people, and to win the people, you must first win the hearts of the people. The so-called "winning the people" means getting the support, support, and help of the people.

    The so-called "winning the world" refers to "ruling the world" through the implementation of benevolent government, rather than fighting for the world by force alone. Benevolent government is to convince people with virtue, make people happy and convinced, and automatically come to attach; And to convince people with force, can not convince people's hearts. In Mencius's view, the way to win the world is to implement benevolent government.

    Because benevolent government is the government of "winning their hearts".

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    The city is not high, the pool is not deep, the military revolution is not strong, and the rice is not not much.

    The source is from "Mencius: Gongsun Chouxia", which refers to standing in justice, benevolence and righteousness, and will be supported and helped by the majority of people; If we violate morality and benevolence, we will inevitably fall into isolation.

    The article compares the "time", "location" and "people", and progresses layer by layer. It proves the truth that "the time is not as good as the location, and the location is not as good as the people".

Related questions
7 answers2024-03-02

Mencius said: "A favorable time is not as good as a favorable terrain, and a favorable terrain is not as good as the unity of people's hearts." Three miles of the inner city, seven miles. >>>More

7 answers2024-03-02

The time is not as good as the location, and the location is not as good as the people.