Simba s fake bird s nest continues to ferment, what is the official explanation for this?

Simba brought goods "fake bird's nest" continues to ferment, the official has issued a case to investigate Simba's fake bird's nest, if the investigation results of Simba and Simba's team are fraudulent, shoddy, then, Simba and Simba's team staff may be imprisoned. In the end, Simba brought fake bird's nest, was it cheated by the manufacturer, or Simba knew that the bird's nest was fake bird's nest from beginning to end, and after the official investigation is over, everything will be revealed. Simba and Simba's team have publicly apologized, and paid 60 million in advance to refund one and pay three to consumers.

Simba also said that he would sue the manufacturer to defend his rights in the future, and it is suspected that the whole matter will be pushed on the manufacturer. However, for Simba's apology and compensation, Wang Hai, a professional anti-counterfeiter, directly spoke out, asking Simba not to deceive himself, shirk responsibility again, and persuaded Simba to turn himself in. In other words, Wang Hai, a professional counterfeiter, believes that Simba has always been well aware of bird's nest.

A variety of live broadcast products are faked**Now it's not just fake bird's nest, most of the products in Simba's live broadcast room have been exposed to be fake, such as toothpaste, latex pillows and moon cakes, etc., and even gold plating can be said to be K gold, Simba's team is also invincible. Therefore, now that the official case has been opened to investigate the matter, Simba looks very lucky, after all, he should know very well how many counterfeit and shoddy goods he has brought with him. Simba should be very panicked now, after all, the official investigation is not a trivial matter, and Simba is likely to become the first anchor to be sent to prison.

The current live broadcast is really too chaotic, it has reached the point where it is not good to be governed, and Simba may become the first object to be governed.

Too arrogantActually, it's not surprising that Simba has today, after all, he is too arrogant and too blind.

Simba, several times in the live broadcast room even recorded a special **, saying that he wanted to find out the person who spread the rumor that bird's nest was fake bird's nest, and to prosecute, the words are like the ancient emperor, it is not surprising that Simba has such a thing today.

The official also apologized for such behavior, and at the same time, said that Simba has now been investigated, and may bear some criminal responsibility will also give them a warning, and they will also strengthen control in this regard, so that people can be on a healthy and safe platform.

The official said that the matter is still under investigation, and it will give everyone a fair statement, and it is possible that Simba will be sentenced to 15 years in prison.

Officials have restricted Simba's live streaming and penalized him. Because he harms the rights and interests of consumers.

Confessed the matter. Simba's company admitted that Simba was selling counterfeit goods and promised to compensate him.

The official said that it has been reported to **Rang** to file a case, and if such a phenomenon really exists in this investigation, and there is relatively sufficient evidence, he will definitely be brought to justice.

Hey, the rich are worried, and those who are in debt like me are also worried.

Simba's "bird's nest incident" occurred in November last year, and in July this year, the incident was finally conclusive. The Guangzhou Arbitration Commission rendered a final arbitration: Simba won the case. What is the real situation?

Let's start with the parties involved in this arbitration. The two parties involved in the arbitration are, Heyi Company and Rongyu Company, and Simba is the anchor of Heyi Company; Rongyu Company is a supplier of "bird's nest". The arbitration took place between the two companies.

Why did Simba's Heyi company win the lawsuit? The arbitral tribunal held that due to Rongyu's misleading behavior, Heyi Company made false or misleading business practices, which had a serious negative impact on Heyi's anchors

This means that Rongyu Company, which provides "bird's nest", has misled Simba. In other words, Simba's live broadcast brought fake bird's nest completely because of Rongyu's misleading.

In addition, according to Heyi's application, the arbitral tribunal also awarded Rongyu Company a symbolic compensation of 1 yuan for Heyi Company's losses. At the same time, more than 3,000 yuan of the return money before December 16, 2020 will be borne by Rongyu Company.

<> written at the end, webcasts have provided a lot of people with the opportunity to become famous and build wealth. It's also a good thing to make good use of live streaming platforms. However, with the popularity of online live streaming and short social networking, more and more problems have been exposed.

Vulgar performances, false publicity, and live broadcasts with fakes emerge in an endless stream. In particular, the "fake bird's nest" incident has also raised the alarm and sounded the bell for the regulatory mechanism of live broadcast platforms. At the very least, we should recognize:

The Internet is definitely not a place outside the law, and no one can take advantage of events that violate the law, ethics, or morality to become popular and use the Internet. The online platform should be a "** platform" to spread positive energy and bad things.

Everyone should establish correct values, and money can be earned, but no one can be "cheated and cheated". In the fake bird's nest incident, Simba may have been "misled" by Rongyu Company, and after the netizen **, Simba also swore that "I will sue these people for slander if I am bankrupt."

But then, faced with conclusive evidence, Simba had to agree to the return request.

Online livestreaming platforms should clear channels for reporting and regulation. For the problems reported by netizens, reply and solve them as soon as possible.

Because he sold counterfeit goods without knowing it, my country's law still has provisions to protect some unsuspecting people.

Although Simba sells fake goods, this product is not produced by himself after all, and he is also a victim, so he will win the lawsuit in the end.

Mainly because he was also misled, because he didn't mean to, so it has nothing to do with him and he can win the lawsuit, so he is now broadcasting again,

Simba's investigation and handling of the "fake bird's nest" incident was announced, because Simba was not involved in a criminal offense, he was only involved in the promotion of the product, not involved in the production. What he did wrong was that he exaggerated the effect of the product and misled consumers. When consumers complained that the product quality was not good, they did not test whether the product quality was good at the first time, and the matter fermented to the end, exposing too many things, before apologizing.

Now the problems exposed by live streaming are now countless. may be because when the live broadcast brings goods, the anchor pays attention to his commission and commission, and often ignores the quality of the product. I felt that it would be okay to sell it, and I felt that I was at ease with that salary.

As everyone knows, it wasn't himself who was hurt in the end. As long as you have a criminal record, it is impossible for the audience to believe you brainlessly in the future. People have their own judgment, and they don't say that they fall in the same place.

It's not good, there will be a lot of fans, from pink to black, after a long time, it will become less and less popular, more and more unpopular, more and more uncarable, and in the end, it will be completely cool and become an outdated Internet celebrity. You can't do live broadcasts with the mentality that making a sum is a sum and running away if you make a penny.

Some time ago, when some anchors brought goods live broadcast, they brought tickets in some scenic spots. The audience thinks that there is really a advantage to take advantage of, but what is the result? After arriving at the place, consumption is mandatory in the scenic spot.

In the end, I was not happy, and I had to suffer a lot of anger, which was completely more than worth the loss. The only good thing about live streaming is that if something really happens, you can find that kind of anchor, if you need to compensate or something, it is more secure, after all, the economic strength of some anchors is really very, very strong.

Integrity management is the long-term solution. Don't do something bad for the sake of momentary gain. Only if you treat others sincerely, others will always support you.

Because these fake bird's nests were not produced by Simba himself, there was a situation where he was lured, and the law gave him such a punishment from the perspective of justice.

Because what he did did did not meet the standard of a criminal offense, and he compensated the consumer in a timely manner, there was no criminal offense involved.

He is not a merchant now, and the bird's nest is not made by him. He presented a lot of evidence to bail himself out, and even more friends spoke out.

Because Simba's incident did not cause physical damage to others, it cannot be considered a criminal offense.

It means that you can buy fakes to deceive consumers, as long as you don't produce them, you can buy them, right??

In other words, you can sell it if you don't make it yourself.

In our cognition, if we are deceived, then we must not be able to bear it. In real life, if we are deceived when we buy something, we will definitely go to the merchant, and of course, if we are deceived when we buy something online, we will also go to the merchant. Nowadays, the trap of live streaming is getting deeper and deeper, and many anchors will behave in the live broadcast room.

said that this thing was very expensive before, and the price was finally lowered, and I hope that my fans can buy more, in fact, these prices have long been negotiated by them. And now these Internet celebrities must have made many fans stop believing in them, Simba is a big Internet celebrity we all believe in, but what we didn't expect is that he sold a fake bird's nest in the live broadcast room.

But we have to know that trust is difficult to build, and once it is broken, it is not so simple to lock the hearts of fans in the heart. Everyone wants to make money, but if they are all unscrupulous businessmen like him, then everyone in this world can be a businessman, so it is necessary to do business in a down-to-earth manner.

And now that the Internet is so developed, it is undoubtedly very difficult for him to make a comeback by doing such a thing, and Simba's mother has appeared to cheat fans in live broadcasts, it is really not that a family does not enter the door. After this incident, Simba also said in the live broadcast room that he would refund one and pay three, and if he bought this fake cigarette nest in Simba's live broadcast room, he would return it to his fans and consumers at three times the **.

Later, Simba supports returns, refunds one and pays three, which can be regarded as an explanation to the masses, but the latest people say that Simba is involved in deceiving consumers and may go to jail.

Now the relevant departments have begun to file an investigation, because the amount of money involved in this matter is too large, and the conditions for filing a case have been met.

The relevant departments set up an investigation team to conduct an on-the-spot investigation of the bird's nest.

After Simba promised to pay three for one leave, he was placed on file for investigation, and it is said that he will face the punishment of a prison sentence. There are a lot of people who cry out for him, but I think he did it himself.

Later, he posted a refund to the customer who purchased the product on the social platform**, and then he didn't say anything, and he didn't say "I'm sorry" to the customer who bought his product.

After Simba sold fake bird's nest, he was also punished and warned, and he would also promise to compensate consumers and propose to pay three for one fake.

Simba's "fake bird's nest" incident, the follow-up is that the law has intervened in this matter, and Simba may be sentenced as a result.