British constitutional monarchy, responsible cabinet system, parliamentary system, and the relations

According to the principle of separation of powers and checks and balances, there are two types of democratic systems: the ** system and the cabinet system. Under the ** system, both the ** and the National Assembly are directly elected by the people.

Congress may not hold it politically accountable, and vice versa, it cannot dissolve Congress. ** Serves as both head of state and head of administration. Under the cabinet system (also known as the parliamentary system), the National Assembly is directly elected.

The head of the executive (prime minister or prime minister) is appointed by the head of state and requires the support of a majority in parliament – in fact, the head of executive is often the majority leader in parliament, with the head of state exercising only formal consent. The Prime Minister (or Prime Minister) is accountable to Parliament. Congress has the power to deny **.

Conversely, the Prime Minister also has the power to dissolve Parliament and re-**. The United States is a ** system. The United Kingdom, Germany, Japan, India and other countries have adopted a cabinet system.

Two-Party System 1 The Concept of Two-Party System: The so-called two-party system refers to a capitalist country.

, a political party system in which two evenly matched parties take turns to hold power by winning a parliamentary majority or winning an election. It refers to a political system in which two major political parties in a country take turns in power, and it does not mean that there are only two ruling parties in a country with a two-party system.

2 Types of two-party systems.

The two-party system was originally created in the "United Kingdom", and the countries that implemented the two-party system are: the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand.

At present, there is a typical model of a two-party system:

1> Model 1: A two-party system under the parliamentary cabinet system represented by the United Kingdom.

1) There were three main stages a: the Whigs.

alternate periods with the Tories; B: The Tories and Whigs evolved into the Conservatives.

and the Liberal Party; C: Labour.

taking the place of the Liberal Party;

2) The British Parliament.

The characteristics of the two-party system in the cabinet system are: a: the activities of the two parties revolve around parliamentary elections, and the ruling party holds not only executive power, but also legislative power; B: The two parties are centralist.

2> mode 2: the ** system represented by the United States. It was not until the 50s of the 19th century that the Republican Party was formed.

and the opposition of the Democratic Party. Characteristics of the two-party system under the ** system in the United States:

1) The two-party system is mainly manifested in the election a: ** is both the head of state and the head of the executive, holding the real power of the executive. B: The number of seats in parliament between the two parties has nothing to do with the status of the ruling and non-ruling parties. ※

2) The two-party organizational structure of the United States.

Loose and without strict voting discipline.

1 The king is the nominal head of state, but he "does not govern the court";

2 Parliament is the centre of power and has legislative power;

3 The responsible cabinet system, in which the British Prime Minister is elected from a majority party that wins in the House of Commons**, and is generally the leader of that party. The Prime Minister can appoint members of the Cabinet to form the Cabinet, and the Prime Minister is the head of the United Kingdom. The Cabinet is accountable to Parliament.

When the parliament does not trust the cabinet, it can initiate the cabinet to topple, and the prime minister can also dissolve the lower house in advance.

4 The application of the two-party system regulates the political struggle in an orderly form, avoiding bloodshed and violent struggle.

Juxtaposition. If you don't have a constitutional monarchy, you have to have a two-party system.

Summary. Generally speaking, a parliamentary constitutional monarchy is not much different from a constitutional monarchy, which uses parliament to restrain the monarch and achieve the goal of not acting arbitrarily. However, the German constitutional monarchy is different, because the German constitutional monarchy is only superficial, the parliamentary power is very small, and the monarch is still dominant.

Hello, I have seen your question and am looking for relevant information, please wait a moment Parliamentary constitutional monarchy is generally not much different from the constitutional monarchy, the constitutional monarchy is to use parliament to restrain the monarch, to achieve the purpose of eliminating the dust and not being arbitrary. However, the German constitutional monarchy is different, because the German constitutional monarchy is only superficial, the parliamentary power is very small, and the monarch is still dominant.

I hope mine can be helpful to you, if you still have any questions, you can continue to ask me, dear.

Generally speaking, the parliamentary constitutional monarchy is not much different from the constitutional monarchy, and the constitutional monarchy is originally to use the parliament to restrain the monarch and achieve the goal of eliminating the dust and not being arbitrary. However, the German constitutional monarchy is different, because the German constitutional monarchy is only superficial, the parliamentary power is very small, and the monarch is still dominant.

No, the separation of powers means that the executive power, legislative power, and judicial power are independent and mutually restrictive, the United Kingdom is a typical parliamentary country, the leader of the largest party in parliament is the prime minister, the prime minister serves as the head of the first function, that is, the highest executor of the executive power, and the legislative power is also in the hands of the parliament at the same time, you can obviously see that the political system in which the legislative power and the executive power are concentrated in the same unit is not a separation of powers at all.

No. It is a constitutional monarchy with a parliamentary system, the center of power is in parliament, and there is no separation of powers. But to some extent, there are checks and balances on power.

First of all, the prime minister is the leader of the majority party in parliament, and after the prime minister forms a cabinet, the cabinet and the prime minister advance and retreat politically, that is, the prime minister has the right to dissolve parliament, and the prime minister must consult with the cabinet on everything. So it has checks and balances, but it's not a separation of powers. The separation of powers is characteristic of American politics.

No, the separation of powers is the independence of the legislative, executive, and judicial powers, which is a political characteristic of the United States, and the United Kingdom is a typical parliamentary constitutional monarchy.

No. The core of the British constitutional monarchy system is the cabinet responsibility system, and the separation of powers is one of the principles of the first republic in the United States.