Is not disliking the leader a sign of low emotional intelligence?

No, I don't like to lead with a knot because I don't have low emotional intelligence.

Some young people really don't like to tie up with leaders, because they don't like to tie up with anyone, and living their lives the way they like is a sign of high emotional intelligence.

No, you should be honest and kind in dealing with people, and you can't be low-grade and low-spirited to please the leader and lose your true self for the sake of promotion and wealth. Be honest. Do things brightly.

Liking to lead is a sign of low emotional intelligence, because they have no other way to live. People with high emotional intelligence can still live a good life even if they don't lead and don't do those dirty things.

Personally, I don't think so, everyone's personality and style are different.

Definitely not, there's no need to slap anyone. But the occasional throngs are also necessary to be smart.

I don't think leadership is a sign of low emotional intelligence.

Some people feel uncomfortable with the leadership.

Don't go to the leader, but let your own value be discovered by the leader, and make yourself irreplaceable.

I don't want to talk to the leader, but I don't have the vision in front of the leader, and the emotional intelligence to do what the leader doesn't like is not high

Explain that you have a lot of personality, but you remember that you are not a leader.

The current leaders have become more refined, and they are very good at pouring chicken soup, drawing cakes, and drawing blueprints.

There's no need for the set of "coaxing the master to be happy" in the past.

Do you think it's easy to reap the benefits of a little stuttering as you did in the past? It's no good to lick the dog, only those who have a servile consciousness deep into their bones will do it.

There are these three manifestations of low emotional intelligence, and if you have one, you have to reflect on it to see if you have low emotional intelligence.

This is not the core problem, your distress should be whether not to lead will bring some harm to yourself?

No. I don't like to tie up with the leader, but also expect the leader's appreciation, which is a sign of low emotional intelligence. I don't like to tie up with leaders, because I don't like to tie up with anyone, and living my life the way I like is a sign of high emotional intelligence.

Mental kneeling and licking, physical kneeling and licking, not pitiful, because it can be beneficial. Mentally arrogant, physically arrogant, not pitiful, because they are comfortable. It's pitiful to be caught in the middle, and if knowledge and action are not united, it is low emotional intelligence.

1 Self-righteousness, good teacher.

There is no lower EQ than feeling that you have high EQ, and none of the really high EQ makes you feel offensive. If the other party always looks like "guiding you", "can't get used to it", or always comes up to correct you here and there without permission, it can already be considered as a low emotional intelligence out of the scope of parenting. Really high emotional intelligence.

It is always good steel to be used on the blade, unity can be united, and what cannot be united is not offended, and the kind of obsessive-compulsive disorder that forces everyone to agree is enough, such as Zhihu.

Bar fine. 2 He does not look down on others, but thinks he is wise.

There is a kind of person who is particularly strange that the way they prove themselves is to repeatedly emphasize where others may be missing, and once encountered a self-righteous person who always felt that he read a book a week and took a second English language was particularly superior.

But in the eyes of people who don't care, you're a drama spirit, and when he finds out that you are better than him, he feels that the reality is particularly unreal, but seriously, who cares about you?

3 Giant baby, you can't learn to empathize, and even if you think, you don't want to change.

One of the trickier traits of people with low emotional intelligence is ......Giant babies can not only cry but also make trouble, losing the demeanor and characteristics that they should have when they are old or experienced. An obvious self-contradiction of low emotional intelligence is the double standard.

Measure you by rules and regulations, but you can't empathize with other people's strengths, weaknesses, and bottom lines.

4 There is too much inner drama and too much dreaming.

Regardless of making friends and intimate lovers, I only hate a kind of inner drama, can't learn to be down-to-earth, such people get along with special fatigue, especially like to play haha in front of key issues, let people misunderstand and take advantage of this misunderstanding, this is not just a stupid category. Advanced emotional intelligence is a kind of taking into account the overall situation, and lubricating all relationships, without praise or disapproval.

5. Learning will not cooperate and develop.

High emotional intelligence is always understood as just pleasing people, but it's not right, it's cooperation and development. Think about it, who would value someone who only pleases others? But if you don't manage the development, you may end up as a breeder. Laugh.

6 No initiative.

People with low emotional intelligence are generally extremely passive, and if they find out, they just feel that they have always felt that they are so ......Very comfortable, of course comfortable for yourself. Low emotional intelligence is very difficult to break the ice, unable to grasp the initiative, and insufficient premonition of sudden or potential risks and difficulties. The kind of one that has no output, doesn't do anything, and has enough fork-to-waist ratio.

7 Only meet your own needs.

No, it's caused by personal character, there is a type of person who just doesn't like to stutter, anyone, he feels that stammering others is a very shameful thing.

No, it's because some people are very upright, so they don't like to be a leader.

No. Because they think that such behavior is very ineffective. The most important thing in the workplace is the ability to work, and nothing else.

Introverted, doesn't like to stammer, speaks straightforwardly, is this good? I feel like that's the kind of person I am. Such people, whether in the workplace or in real life, are not popular and can't get away.

In line with the principle of working diligently and being a down-to-earth person, he is never willing to please the leader, let alone the leader, and sometimes he will be stubborn and make the leader unhappy. Such a person, even if he has a strong work ability, a strong sense of responsibility, and a very outstanding work performance, will not like it from the heart of the leader.

Such people, although they work hard, have a strong sense of responsibility, and their performance is also very outstanding, and everyone admires them in terms of work alone, but in terms of dealing with people, everyone will feel that they are not very close, and even make people feel a little cold and difficult to get along with, so many people stay away.

Such people don't like to go with the flow, don't like to follow the crowd, don't like to see the wind and steer the rudder, and don't like to compromise and seek perfection. A lot of false things, unfair things, and immoral things, they are difficult to accept, and their hearts are full of a sense of justice, but they can't change the real society, so they live a particularly tangled and painful life.

Such people generally live a more pessimistic life, often feel dissatisfied with some phenomena in the real society, and feel sad and indignant about some unfair and unjust things in the workplace and work life. So, such people are really not good. But it is difficult to change the temperament of the country, and it is really difficult for a person's character to change.

But I personally have always believed that insisting on yourself, following yourself, and living according to your own ideas is not a choice?

Not good. It's true that you are introverted and don't like to talk to the leader, then you may be a little estranged from the leader, it is difficult to be promoted, and it is not too big a deal, but if you speak straightforwardly, it is easy to offend the leader, offend your colleagues, and finally be excluded and isolated.

I think this is good, don't tie the leader, you don't have to look at the leader's face Although you suffer in the evaluation of job titles and the selection of excellence, at least look at the pug face of those who like to tie up the leader, and when you look at the face of the pug, you are quite content, and your character is innate, do your job well, and having a good body is a blessing.

This is not good, if you don't communicate with your colleagues and leaders, they will think you are strange and may target you later and give you small shoes.

In the workplace, many people always deliberately flatter the leader, but in fact, as a leader, they especially like to tie up their own people, because this can make them reflect the value of their existence. If employees don't know how to please the leader, it will make the leader feel that the employee does not treat himself as a leader at all, and thus has a bad relationship with the employee.

Everyone will have their own job in the process of growing up, but there will be many problems in the workplace, some people know how to lead, so they are mixed in the workplace, but some people are very high. The special self who lives does not know how to please the leader, resulting in their whole life doing nothing. In fact, as a leader, I especially like those who please themselves, because these people like to pat themselves on the back, and always pick up some nice things to say to the leaders, and as leaders, they also like to listen to these words, so the relationship between leaders and these people is very good.

Many people always deliberately curry favor with leaders in the workplace, but in fact, we must first improve our own strength in the workplace, and then please the leader. If you don't have the strength, just blindly to please the leader, such a person will not be reused by the leader, only the strength can have the capital to stand in the workplace circle, will be respected and liked by more people. As leaders, although they like some sycophants, they are more inclined to some capable people, because ability can bring higher benefits to the company, and capable people will also be reused by leaders.

In fact, in the workplace, we must know how to be tactful, and we must also have high emotional intelligence, only in this way can we mix well in the workplace, especially when getting along with leaders, we must use high emotional intelligence to resolve embarrassment. Be sure to make the leader happy, the leader will be happy and will be impressed with you, and will promote you in the future work, so that you will create more value in life.

Therefore, many leaders are particularly fond of those who are sycophants, because this can give them a sense of satisfaction.

It should not be liked, but it is not excluded either. No one hates people who pat themselves on the back, but I believe that leaders prefer capable people, even if they have a bad temper.

I think leaders will like it, and leaders like such people to stammer themselves and please themselves, so that they can have a greater sense of existence.

Vary. Some leaders like this, and some leaders hate it, so they can't generalize.

Of course, leaders will like it, and for some leaders, they like their downstairs people to revolve around them every day, and they will platter themselves by slapping their beards, so that they will have a sense of existence.

I think leaders will like it, because leaders like to have people pat themselves, whether they admit it or not, but they definitely like it.

First of all, too obvious stammering leaders are not conducive to getting along with other colleagues in the workplace. Personally, I think that in the workplace, I should do my job well, strive to improve my ability, and speak with my work strength. As long as the work is done well, the leader will naturally prefer to work with high ability.

If you don't have excellent work ability, you can only make a profit for a while, not for a long time, but if you have real skills, you don't have to be a leader, there will be leaders who value you, for fear of offending you. Because the performance of many leaders is also piled up by capable subordinates, it is necessary to understand that having real skills is more respected than stammering.

Having a good relationship with your colleagues in a unit, especially the appreciation of your leaders, will be of great help to your personal future development, and I have worked in a large company for several years. Often when you have nothing to do, you often "drink and complain, talk about the world" with the leaders and colleagues, naturally, the mass foundation is good, and you are also valued by the leaders, and often appear in front of the leaders, he can also remember you. Because the leader felt that my social skills were okay, I was promoted later, and I was exposed to some high-end meetings and dinners, as well as some business development learning meetings.

I feel that I have indeed improved a lot compared to my previous concept, and after I became familiar with the company, it was very smooth to go to various departments to do things, and the problems of others were solved smoothly in my place.

Of course, there are also some shortcomings, such as the failure of the political struggle of the unit leader, which will definitely be attacked by the faction of other leaders. I think that the knots in your question are just the usual way of contact and communication with the leader, which does not indicate that you have low emotional intelligence. In short, communicate with the leaders more, you will definitely be able to learn a lot of things, after all, most of the leaders are from the grassroots positions, exchange work experience, will reduce their detours in the work, listen to some of your words, better than ten years of reading.

I don't think it's a sign of low emotional intelligence that I don't know how to lead a leader, because it's sometimes inevitable to be a leader in a rough workplace, and I think there's no way around it.

I don't think such people are people with low emotional intelligence. It's because they have some of their own mindsets. Bu Lu rang so they want to develop on their own, and there is no shortage of people who are not low EQ.

I don't like to be a leader is indeed a sign of low emotional intelligence, and I don't need to slow down our self-esteem to lead the leader, but to treat the leader with a correct attitude.

In fact, this is not a manifestation of low emotional intelligence, because everyone's personality is different, so they can't go to this to judge his behavior, in fact, it is also correct, as long as you do the work and complete it, you can do it, but I hate this Zheng Peiyan flattery, relying on his own strength to get promoted.