-
Is it correct to produce filial sons under the sticks?
-
The way the filial son behaves under the stick is incorrect, from"Sticks"In two words, such an act actually contains an element of violence.
For teenagers, such behaviors can easily lead to psychological problems in adolescents. Behavioral medicine experts have found through surveys that long-term parents"Stick education"When children grow up, there are many people whose marriage and family life are not harmonious, and they cannot educate their children well, and even completely ignore the healthy growth of their own children. Such a disgusting cycle shows that the theory of filial piety under the stick is actually incorrect.
As a parent, when educating your child, you should fully consider your child's psychological condition, and at the same time, you should also reflect on whether your behavior will have a negative impact on your child. In order to educate a child to become a talent with good quality, as a parent, you should first let yourself play a good role model in front of your child.
-
This sentence is in the eyes of different people! The answer is different! Right in the eyes of feudal people! Because their minds are very feudal!
However, it is not right in the eyes of our modern people! Everyone has to save face!
If parents beat with sticks!
effect, it can backfire!
Children have made mistakes! Communication, it's good if you don't take an example!
There's no need to roll around with sticks!
To err is human?
-
No, this kind of education is not used at all in modern society, but it will make children have a very serious rebellious mentality.
-
Sometimes it is possible to have filial sons, but it is not absolutely possible to produce filial sons, mainly because each child has a different personality, and some children may hold a grudge against you if you are violent to him.
-
No, this kind of education is very incorrect, and the so-called child is obedient because the child has become very afraid of his parents.
-
The statement that filial piety comes from under the stick is false. The emergence of various incidents of "stick education" fully shows the blind obedience of parents to the education of their children.
Stick tutoring is a way to educate children by using violent corporal punishment, and this kind of tutoring has traditional elements and is also influenced by some so-called wolf parents and tiger parents. Although this kind of corporal punishment is not enough to commit crimes, it is also a type of domestic violence, which has attracted social attention.
The reason for stick-style education.
After the implementation of the family planning policy of stick tutoring, many families have only children, so the issue of children's education has become a big problem. Under the doting education, parents have cultivated batches of "little emperors" and "little princesses" who are too self-centered and can't stand a little setback.
Since the beginning of the 21st century, there has been an education model that goes against the trend: "** education", that is, either the father or the mother is very strict with his own children, and the way of education is mainly corporal punishment education.
A group of "wolf dads" and "tiger moms" have emerged. However, their emergence also has its own remarkable success as capital: "Wolf Dad" Xiao Baiyou sent three children to Peking University with the education method of "beating".
As soon as they became so famous, parents seemed to see hope and followed suit.
-
It's not true, this kind of education will cause irreparable damage to children, will make children hate their parents, and can not establish their own prestige well, so it is recommended that parents should lead by example, set an example, reward and punish clearly, and respect children's ideas, so as to be of better help to children.
-
This is not true because it is not good for the physical health of the child, it is not good for the child's physical development, and it can also make the child feel sad, so I don't think it is true.
-
It's not true, because this kind of education is an education method handed down from ancient times, and it is a wrong concept, and children should not be beaten.
-
I don't think it's true, children don't fight, children are educated, and the more they fight, the more rebellious they become.
-
As the old saying goes, "filial piety comes out under the stick", it is regarded as the criterion for the older generation and the parents before the older generation to educate their children, you may not know that the next sentence of this sentence is "pampering creates disobedient children", from ancient times to the present, the parents of the big family will formulate strict family laws, severely punish the children who make mistakes, and show no mercy.
Judging from the trajectory of China's thousands of years of cultural and historical development, rewarding and punishing wrong has always been the golden rule of Chinese envelopes, and I believe that most parents have no objection to this. Then we need to take a look at it: filial piety under the stick, why is the method of the ancient big family playing the board at every turn in modern times, why is it not particularly applicable?
How many parents have injured their children's bodies and hearts, as well as their children's bodies and hearts, and the more they hit, the more problems they have. This is at the heart of our discussion today.
Can a child hit? The answer to this sentence is 100% "can fight", and the key question is when to fight and because of what. The reason for the fight is not clear, and the timing of the fight is not right, it will be counterproductive. Some of the common error scenarios are as follows:
1 Impulsive parents: When the child makes a mistake, it doesn't matter if he doesn't ask about it, he or she will be smoking, maybe he feels that he has lost face, or in order to maintain his dignity, he doesn't ask the truth, he doesn't investigate the root cause, and the result of beating the child is two, one is for nothing, and the other is to beat the child away.
2 Emotional parents: look at the mood of the parents, if the mood is good, the world is peaceful, the baby is good, good food, drink and fun, once the mood is bad, the child will suffer, even scolded and beaten, what is wrong with the child, the beating is inexplicable, this kind of child will become sensitive, shy, inferior, and dare not easily express his thoughts.
3 Regret parents: Hit the child, see the child crying, angry parents will feel regret, guilt, feel sorry for the child, so that the child is at a loss, saying that he is wrong, the parents also apologize to themselves, saying that they are right, why do parents beat themselves, will form the child's contradictory personality.
4 Abusive Parents: This type of parent is relatively rare, and children are born as venting tools.
To sum up, there are several basic conditions that must be met for hitting a child to have results:
1 Love, when there is love flowing between you and your child, the child will clearly know that you are for her good, will understand you, will carry out inner reflection, and then grow.
2. Principle, to give children the correct outlook on life, values, outlook on life teaching, only under this premise, the teacher is famous, the name of the play is right, the child can feel the mistake itself, and then form the motivation for improvement.
3 Be cautious, it is obvious that playing every day will definitely not have any educational effect, and only a special one will make the child memorable.
I hope that this text will be helpful for parents who like to talk often and occasionally do it, and be sure to pay attention to the accumulation of feelings with their children in order to ensure that they are accepted when you want to educate your children, otherwise it will definitely backfire.
-
In the past, it was common for children to be beaten.
Therefore, disciplining children is also based on beating and scolding.
Poor people don't have so much time and energy to educate their children.
Now the standard of living has improved and the level of education has increased. Naturally, we can't stick to the old ways.
This is the ideology of Chinese feudal society, and it has no scientific basis. This sentence can be understood as to teach children with a correct outlook on life, "loving mother and strict father" is the best proof, have time to communicate with the child, understand what he is thinking, nothing more empathy to think, rather than relying on violence to solve, learn more about some of the habits of contemporary children, the most important thing is communication, a day with ten minutes to communicate is not long, otherwise a week can be, because only by understanding the child's inner world, can we develop a suitable education method for children.
Nowadays, many children are treasures in the eyes of parents, and parents love their children too much and are reluctant to beat and scold their children, resulting in children's indulgence, so children lack rational knowledge and understanding of many problems. Parents are too good to their children, and the children are a little embarrassed, and they don't know how thick the sky is, so the saying that filial piety comes out under the stick also makes sense. <> >>>More
I don't think the two are directly related, because filial piety is a person's beautiful character, and it may be such a character since childhood. And if the more you beat the child, the more rebellious the child becomes, and it will not be a filial child.
I don't agree with this concept of education; Because this kind of potato sedan car education concept is relatively traditional and backward, and it will cause serious damage to the child's psychology, affect the child's physical and mental health, and lead to the child's personality defects.