A proof of ordinary differential equation about the comparative theorem and the extension theorem OD

Updated on educate 2024-04-12
11 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    Using the extension theorem of the solution, let y=u(x) be the initial value of the problem (e'):y'=f(x,y),y(x1)=y1 (definitely exists), considering the region in the rectangular region r bounded by y=w(x) and y=z(x) and the boundary and the point (x0, y0) (in this region), apply the extension theorem of the solution, y=u(x) extends to the right to cross the boundary of this region, you may wish to intersect y=w(x), then y=u can be constructed'(x), take u(x) before intersection, take w(x) after intersection to (x0, y0), smoothness can be guaranteed, u"(x) the conditions are satisfied, and other circumstances can be proved accordingly. I don't understand, then pm me, I also use this textbook ==, the answer at the back of the book is a few words "the extension theorem using the solution".

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    If that point falls on the largest or minimum solution, then the maximum or minimum solution can be used directly on that small interval; And if that point falls between the largest or smallest solution, then we try to write the solution to be constructed as an interpolation of the largest and minimum solutions.

    u(x)=(1-a(x))w(x)+a(x)z(x), and then construct a(x) through ode.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    It's also my homework for the week. Together.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    The two solutions are represented by h(x), g(x), h(x 0)x0, such that h(x 1)>=h(x 1).

    So, since h(x), g(x) are continuous, there must be x 1>=x 2>x 0 such that h(x 2)=g(x 2), which shows that there are two different integration curves for the crossing point (x 2,h(x 2)), which contradicts any point on r 2 and has only one integration curve.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    Where does this begin? Your handwriting is beautiful.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    What's the good explanation for this??? It's that when those conditions are met, there is a unique solution...

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    There are a large number of differential equations that cannot be solved by the elementary integral method, and in practice, it is necessary to know whether the equation has a solution and whether the solution is unique, so mathematicians began to study the existence uniqueness of the solution.

  8. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    Refer to the first section of chapter 6 of the book in the link.

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    Let f(x) = inequality left - right.

    Derivative of f(x).

    f'(x)=0+ln(x+(1+x 2) ln(x+(1+x 2) Note: The last two items are removed.

    It also compares the size of x+(1+x 2) with the size of 1.

    x+(1+x^2)^

    The square of the minus sign gives 1+x 2 and 1+x 2-2x, because x<0 and the right side is larger, so x+(1+x 2) is less than 1, and ln(x+(1+x 2) is less than 0

    x<0, f(x).

  10. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    f(x,y)=x-y^2

    f(x,y1)-f(x,y2)| y1^2-y2^2|And |y1+y2|<=1, hence |f(x,y1)-f(x,y2)| = |(y1-y2)|

    Lipschitz conditions are met.

    So there is a unique solution.

    Note: The <= above means less than or equal to.

  11. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    Have you studied functional analysis? The Banach image compression principle can be used to prove the uniqueness of the solution of ordinary differential equations.

Related questions
5 answers2024-04-12

The practical applications of differential equations are as follows: >>>More

13 answers2024-04-12

The calculation of the example problem should make the trembling error, the method is as follows, the ruler slips and respects the tomb carefully. >>>More

5 answers2024-04-12

Summary. This equation belongs to the second-order differential equation. >>>More

29 answers2024-04-12

In the ordinary differential equations of this course, the content of the specific solution of the equation is not the focus, and the real essence lies in the qualitative analysis, including existential uniqueness, stability, and so on. Because most of the equations cannot be solved analytically, but we still have to analyze the properties of the solutions when they cannot be solved concretely, which is the basic spirit of modern ordinary differential equation theory and partial differential equation theory. As for not understanding the lipschitz condition, I can only say that the foundation of the number of points is not solid enough, lipschitz is defined in the number of points continuously, and the uniqueness of the picard iteration proves that it does not go beyond the scope of the number of points. >>>More