Go to its religion, leave its philosophy, and the relationship between religion and philosophy!! Urg

The construction of a harmonious society requires the infiltration of religious culture, and the resolution of contradictions in a harmonious society also requires the unique influence of religious culture. At the same time, it is also necessary to have a good social environment for the role of religion and culture to play. When we examine the current social and religious atmosphere in China from a critical eye, we are pleased to find that the number of believers of various religions is increasing, and the number of people studying and studying religion is gradually growing.

The social phenomena of prejudice, misunderstanding, and incomprehension about religion in the past are gradually decreasing, and a good social environment suitable for the development of religious culture is slowly taking shape.

Moreover, according to the experience of the Asian "four little tigers," which share the same traditional cultural background as China, when the economy develops rapidly and the people's living standards improve by a large margin, a series of major changes may take place in the spiritual and cultural aspects, and the main changes are the unprecedented activity of religious belief activities. To a certain extent, this has alleviated the social pain caused by the rapid economic development and rapid changes in the society in these countries. And this is entirely possible in China in the future.

Therefore, with the extensive and in-depth construction of a harmonious society, religious culture will certainly play an increasingly active role in it.

Buddhism is not a religion in the first place, Buddhism does not have a god who rules everything, everything is ruled by all beings.

How do you go to its religion?

The landlord's thoughts are like making a person lose his soul and leave a body empty.

Wuhan University went to Wuhan University to have a look.

Personally, I think!

Every religion has its own philosophical system, but religion is not just philosophy!

For believers and researchers, no one can talk about the understanding of religion objectively!

There are too many subjective emotions mixed with the believers, so why shouldn't the researchers?

Philosophers do not necessarily practice their own philosophical views.

Religion, on the other hand, is all about practical practice and empirical evidence.

Just as the former only studies Buddhism as a philosophy, he will not be able to feel the true meaning of Buddhism.

In general, religion is the distortion of human understanding in the human mind, which is idealistic and unscientific.

Religion is a kind of philosophy, and when I was studying book classification, I classified religious books into philosophy according to the Chinese Book Classification Law.

Connection: Any great religion must have philosophy at its core. In fact, every great religion is a philosophy with a certain superstructure, including superstitions, doctrines, rituals, and institutions. This is my (Feng Youlan's) understanding of religion.

Feng Youlan: If there is no way to achieve higher values other than religion, then it is indeed a pity that people's religious consciousness is becoming weaker and weaker, because if the public abandons philosophy, they also abandon higher values.

Difference: Fortunately, there is philosophy that can reach a higher value than religion, and this channel is more direct than religion. Because of the higher value through philosophy, people do not go around in circles, through prayers and rituals.

The more important value that people achieve through philosophy must be achieved through religion, and the content is purer, because there is no imagination or superstition mixed in it. Man does not need to be religious, but man must be philosophical. When a man is philosophized, he receives the highest blessings that religion has to offer.

Philosophy can only **, religion only worships.

There is only right and wrong in philosophy, and religion is divided into good and evil.

Philosophy influences people's thoughts, and religion influences people's behavior.

Philosophy can save the world, but religion can only make people submit, the above is my personal summary and understanding.

Very simple relationship. That is, the philosophy of religion is higher than the philosophy of secular philosophy.

Philosophy can make people know God, and it can also make people turn away from God.

Philosophy is the product of the thinking of the limited human brain. God tells mankind that philosophical ideas are inferior to God's Word.

If you are free - Protector Level 14.

Did you come up with your words yourself? How is it basically exactly the same as my theory.

The charm of philosophy is that it is always like a labyrinth, and the truth is on the outside. Because philosophy does not tell you the truth, there are no answers, philosophy only has questions, only confusion, only exploration. At best, philosophy can only provide a window into the truth.

Not with religion. Religion tells you the "truth" directly, directly gives you a door, no exploration, no confusion, very comforting, only faith and cultivation. But from the point of view of the incorrigible philosopher, the problem lies precisely in the premise:

Is the truth that tells you directly the truth? I don't believe that there is anyone in the world who holds the truth, even if that person speaks in the name of God. There is also the problem that, in addition to the practice of religious truth, it is purely appealing to inner feelings, while philosophical "truth" must be spoken, communicated, demonstrated, and logically (even if it is said in a logical way about non-logical and super-logical things).

There is a difference here, the crux of religion is faith, which can lead to superstition and fanaticism, while the spirit of philosophy is skepticism, which is incompatible with superstition and cannot lead to superstition. Religion is always a personal matter, while philosophy is public and open.

Does it matter? Does the logic of religion correspond to normal physical logic?

Misunderstanding.

Philosophy is sometimes a kind of religious criticism, but is religion a kind of subjective idealism? These two sentences are not related.

Specialization, no connection. Genus.

Second, religion and philosophy intersect, but not from the former, but as a fact. Philosophy is the daughter of religion.

Third, it is normal, realistic, understandable, and inevitable that there is a contradiction between master and servant, and there is nothing to make a fuss about. Therefore, there is no contradiction between "the religious criticality of philosophy" or "the partial opposition between philosophy and religion".

The two are of course related and closely developed. But the two are different. Philosophy emphasizes speculation, religion emphasizes faith!