Why does morality become hypocritical in the face of human nature?

Morality is the need for people to learn and self-restraint, but human nature has been determined from the beginning of life, people do not destroy for themselves, when they touch interests, many people will turn against each other, people will always be carried away by interests, what morality, cultivation, all roll aside, I only want interests. Some people say that human nature is inherently good, and it is society that changes us. There are also people who say that human nature is inherently evil, which is why we have to go to school for so many years to make ourselves kind.

I want to say that both good and evil are part of us, and when your ugly human nature begins to trend towards you, you must restrain yourself with your own moral norms and tell yourself that I don't need it, otherwise you let human nature drive you arbitrarily, and morality will really become very hypocritical, and it will give people the feeling that they want it very much, but they pretend not to want it. <>

It is impossible for everyone to be recognized by everyone, for example, if you want to give out a bonus, there are only three places, you don't want the bonus because you are hindered by something, you go to the boss and say that you don't want it, abstain, and then you tell your colleagues about it, and they think that it will definitely not be you in the end. But the boss feels that you are better than others, and he still chooses you, and you can think about what everyone will think of you. Human nature is so ugly, any morality, any humility, will deteriorate in front of human nature.

When morality and humanity collide, the loser must be morality, because there are really not many people with morality, but human nature is the people of the whole world. No matter how moral you are, is it still moral when faced with the accusations of a thousand people? Isn't morality sour and so hypocritical?

I don't think it's morality that has become hypocritical, it's that people's thinking has become extreme!

In today's society, if you help others, others either regard your kindness as a donkey's liver and lungs, or they think that you have nothing to do and are courteous, and you must have a bad heart. Or blame you, why don't you do good things to the end, and send the Buddha to the west.

How hard you risked, you saved someone, and people think that this person is not stupid; Or feel that you are hypocritical morality, that you are not helping people, that you are fighting for a halo on your own head.

Also, what do you think of those people you pick up and slander you for pushing and knocking down? Good intentions were struck by lightning.

In short, no matter what you do, no matter how righteous your heart is, it will be ill-intentioned in the eyes of others.

Can I blame you for this? Can you say you're hypocritical?

No! It's not your fault, it's the fault of those who have problems with their thinking.

In fact, many times, people's hearts can't be exchanged for people's hearts, and they will be disappointed.

Isn't there a saying that "the most affectionate can't be retained, only the routine can win people's hearts"? If kindness and morality have been wasted in the eyes of others, then others must have thought, how can I be kind and helpful, but in the end I end up like this, then why should I help others? I might as well be humble and happy!

Isn't it? Many times, morality is not hypocritical, and humanity is not selfish. It's just that there are too many rat feces in this society, and they often give those enthusiastic and lovely people a big pot of cold water, and if they pour too much, their hot hearts will be extinguished.

However, no matter when and where, please firmly believe that morality is beautiful after all, and human nature is good after all. You can't feel that this world is dark because of some rat, what you think may not be what you think.

There is a good saying, it is called that if a man does not do it for himself, the heavens and the earth will be destroyed.

Now the incident of Liu Xin and Jiang Ge, which is being hyped up on Weibo, must have been heard by everyone. Many people are scolding Liu Xin for not being human, because Jiang Ge died to protect her, but she has always taken a dodgy attitude, and even spoke ill of Jiang Ge's family, which made many netizens angry and Jiang Ge's mother very angry.

In fact, from Liu Xin's point of view, she didn't do anything wrong, because all her starting points were for herself, whether she was avoiding this matter or speaking ill of Jiang Ge's family, she was all for herself, this is human nature, because when everyone encounters something unfavorable to them, they will always think of how to protect themselves at the first time.

But why was she abused by so many netizens? Because Jiang Ge died to protect her, and even said that maybe Jiang Ge didn't think that she would have to pay the price of her life to protect Liu Xin, but in the face of such a life-saving benefactor and the parents of the life-saving benefactor, Liu Xin's attitude repeatedly made netizens feel cold!

From a moral point of view, we can criticize Liu Xin infinitely, it can be said that she is a white-eyed wolf, after such a big thing happened, she chose to escape again and again, does she think that human life is a matter of heaven, she can hide for a while?

And when she met Jiang Ge's mother, although she kept crying and repenting, everyone could see that she was very hypocritical, and she avoided Jiang Ge's mother's problems every time, which seemed very insincere.

So no matter what morality or pay, in front of such a hypocritical person, it's all air, it's all, I hope Jiang Ge can be okay in heaven, and I also hope that the murder ** can correct the law on the spot!

How can morality be fooled, who can be represented by the entertainment report, indiscriminately, the shallowness of thought is that morality cannot be reduced, with these varied, people with ulterior motives, where is the intention.

Aphids eat grass, rust eats iron, and hypocrisy eats souls.

Chekhov was filial.

Hypocrisy can be understood as falsehood, disguise, and hypocrisy is not only a state of mind, but also a way of behaving. Hypocrisy is a kind of mask of personality, a kind of cloak wrapped in humanity. Humans will automatically manipulate it when they use it, showing a side that is beneficial to themselves, and it is also a manifestation of selfishness.

People are seeking advantages and avoiding disadvantages, and most of them will be cautious and hypocritical expressions when it comes to themselves, which is a "rational choice" and a kind of inner personality.

In my opinion, there are two kinds of real hypocrisy, false hypocrisy, and there is a difference between the two. Often true hypocrisy is a kind of goodwill, and false hypocrisy is sanctimoniousness. One of the characteristics of this kind of person is that when he talks to you, he talks about what others are like, when he talks to others, and when he talks to others, he says how you are.

We believe that moral hypocrisy is the most indecent. Here's my personal understanding.

In essence, the disguise of morality is a further level of fraud. Morality is reduced to hypocrisy, which is more serious in nature and has a worse impact than other hypocrisy. That's why we say it's the most obscene.

In the heart of the puppet monarch, moral cultivation is not only no longer a pursuit, but also no longer has a lofty position, as if the only meaning of its existence is to increase the means to deceive others. Such a heart is almost hopeless. This is the personal reason why "morality is degenerate into hypocrisy and is the most indecent".

In terms of influence, the existence of hypocritical morality seriously pollutes the social atmosphere. It undermines the credibility of morality and threatens the space in which true morality should live. When people's simple and kind hearts are hurt by disguise again and again, it seems inevitable that sincerity and simplicity in society will be doubted.

If this is the case, it will be followed by the further destruction of true goodness. This is the social reason why hypocrisy is the most obscene morality.

Focusing on the present, we do not shy away from phenomena such as moral decay and hypocrisy in the context of the rapid development of material civilization, but there is reason to believe that true goodness is rooted in the soil and nourishment for growth in this society, and believes in its vitality.

When the hypocritical whitewashed morality is gradually widespread, it is undoubtedly a great sorrow for the whole society and each of its members. Resisting hypocritical morality requires the joint efforts of the whole society.

Although the power of a single skin is meager, everyone working together will definitely create a better home.

In my humble opinion, the text content is the original work for reference.

Here are some examples:

1. People in the world must make friends, and they must not make deep friendships.

2. It is difficult to draw the skin and bones of the bird, and it is difficult to draw the bones, and you know the face but not the heart.

3, turning over the hands for the clouds and covering the hands of the rain, they are light and thin, so why count.

Use hypocrisy to change behavior. When hypocrisy reaches its maximum, most people opt for direct methods to reduce cognitive dissonance and change behavior. When hypocrisy is not maximized, most people choose indirect methods to reduce cognitive dissonance and thus change behavior.

When cognitive dissonance causes people to feel hypocritical, behavior changes for the better. Researchers (Aronson, Fried &Stone, 1991) speculate that under these conditions, individuals with a sense of hypocrisy experience strong cognitive dissonance.

And this sense of hypocrisy is so strong that indirect methods (such as distracting oneself, or raising one's self-perception through imagination, or engaging in other positive behaviors that are praised) do not reduce the individual's sense of dissonance. Cognitive dissonance can only be reduced by using direct methods to eliminate the contradiction between what is said and what is done.

Using cognitive dissonance to trigger a sense of hypocrisy can indeed be effective in changing people's behavior, which can lead to better health and safety. However, in order to maximize the effects of cognitive dissonance, the following must be achieved: the person must publicly support the behavior he or she approves of (e.g., wearing a seat belt), then they must be induced to think about the reasons for not doing so in the past, and finally there must be a direct way to reduce the cognitive dissonance.

When these conditions are met, there is bound to be a favorable change in behavior.

Cognitive dissonance induced by false feelings (inducing an individual to openly approve of certain attitudes or behaviors and then reminding them that they have not been doing what they say they have been doing all along) is a powerful tool for making beneficial changes in behavior.