How to write a statement in a debate competition??? Rely on yourself or fight dad

Our view is that you are on your own to make the difference in success. Let's not talk about whether this phenomenon of gnawing at the old people is correct, even if we can really rely on our parents to succeed, will others agree with us? Will our entire interpersonal circle be okay later on?

In addition, my country has been doing everything for the sake of honoring parents for the life of its children all over the years, but now it is going to gnaw at the old, doesn't it make foreigners have more jokes?

Who are you? 1 class of 2 classes, 1 debate? Lin Qiang forced you like this? Poor audience members said they were not stressed!!

The first and fourth drafts have models that can be set.

du, the zhi of the first debate is called the dao opening statement, and the fourth debate is called the general version of the closing statement. The format of the draft is:

Opening remarks (respectful.

First of all, allow me to elaborate on the words in the debate (explain each word in the debate) and why we are saying it. It is based on the following three points.

First, (Argument 1). Examples of sub-arguments, summaries.

Second, (Argument 2). Examples of sub-arguments, summaries.

Third, (Argument 3). Examples of sub-arguments, summaries.

To sum up, we unanimously agree that (your topic).

Thank you!

Thank you! End of my case.

It is best to include three parts: a refutation of the opponent's previous arguments, a summary and restatement of one's own viewpoint, and a call for humanity. The arguments that come out of this line of thinking are absolutely wonderful, and in addition, you are the last to speak according to the rules, and when writing the arguments, you can "make a big statement", that is, use some arguments or examples that are flawed but have great offensive power, because no one will stand up and refute you again.

In addition, the rebuttal should also be prepared in advance, to prevent the tension on the field and not being able to pick out the opponent's mistakes, write a few more, and when the time comes, you can really deduct the hat, anyway, he can't appeal, you say that he committed it, he committed it. It's impossible to come up with the content of the debate at once, as an old fourth debater, I can only teach you this.

It is difficult to determine what to say, because it depends on the situation on the spot.

As a fourth debater, you should take on the following tasks:

1. Summarize the content of the offensive debate and free debate, mainly grasp the loopholes of the other party, and then refute them one by one, generally no more than 5 articles, 3 4 articles are more appropriate. Note that it must be written according to the on-site situation, and cannot be memorized. You can use the other party's point of view according to the topic in advance, and then write the corresponding countermeasures, if the other party hits this point, use it, and forget it if you don't mention it.

2. Reiterate our views. Concisely restate the points made in our arguments, but don't copy them.

3. If there is a question from the audience, you should be prepared to ask a question to the four debaters.

4. Pay attention to the language, the fourth debate is best to play momentum, if it is too lyrical, it will not give a good impression to the judges.

If you speak after the other party has finished arguing, you can refute the opponent's argument (time is enough) because the other party will never have a chance to refute you

I have also done four debates, because I won the debate, first of all, you have to show your politeness, 'Thank you, the chairman, the judges, the opponent's debaters, the audience, I am honored that my summary can draw a perfect end to this competition, I hope that there is more than the above meaning of the competition, although the opponent's debaters have wonderful eloquence and wise thinking, but in the process of attacking the debate and free debate, they have made endless mistakes, and I can point out from the following aspects.

1.The other party repeatedly ......Avoiding talking about it, repeatedly avoiding our problems, is the other party admitting that he is at a loss2The other side will ......The concept is secretly replaced by ......, did not put my focus on this contest 3The other party's answer to our question is far-fetched.

4.The other party generalizes to a partial, blind man's image, and he is blind.

Key points to illustrate our point of view:

1.It's better to add humor.

2.Play a round for yourself, so that the other party can't get off the stage.

3.If there is something speechless, you can remedy it at this time, the other party has no chance to refute you, I am okay with you, you can sort out the information yourself, the important thing is momentum'

The one above looks like a veteran! I'm also a new debater, a senior!

People often say: first there is Bole, and then there is Maxima, so it can be seen that opportunities are more important than struggle.

Do you have any arguments that you learn at school?

The process of answering arguments is to use logical thinking forms such as concepts, judgments, and reasoning to analyze and synthesize objective things. Then, by presenting facts and reasoning, he directly proves his own claims from the front. The ultimate purpose of the argument is to correctly reveal the essence and laws of objective things.

The arguments presented should be clear, accurate, and correct. What is for and what is against should indicate the author's attitude; The views put forward should be able to truthfully reflect the reality of objective things; The established arguments should reveal the essence of things, conform to scientific principles and the party's principles and policies, and reflect the aspirations and demands of the masses of the people. The viewpoint is in the material, the material is in practice, and the correct viewpoint is in the scientific analysis of the material, which requires us to have a Marxist standpoint, viewpoint and method.

Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen political study and constantly improve our theoretical accomplishment and ability to understand, so that we can extract clear, accurate, and correct viewpoints from a large pile of materials. In short, the argument should be extracted from the actual material, and be correct and distinct.