The Role of Reasoning Arguments 20, The Role of Reasoning Arguments

Reasoning argumentation: Proving an argument by reasoning to make the argument more generalized and deeper.

Format of answer: The argumentation method of the rational argument is used to demonstrate the ......so that the argument is more generalized and deeper.

Note: If you cite famous quotes, aphorisms, and authoritative data, it can enhance the persuasiveness and authority of the argument; Cites celebrity anecdotes and anecdotes can enhance the interest of the argument and attract readers to read it.

Answer format: The argumentation method of citing arguments is used, by citing ......Proof ......points of view to make the argument more convincing. (or more interesting, to entice the reader to read on).

The argumentation method of the rational argument is used to demonstrate the ......so that the argument is more generalized and deeper.

Quote ......of the reasoning or argument ......point of view to make the argument more convincing and authoritative.

Reasoning argumentation: Use the method of reasoning, and use the incisive insights in the classics to prove the point.

The function of the argument is to make the argument authoritative and convincing. Reasoning argumentation refers to the use of incisive opinions in classic works, famous sayings and aphorisms of ancient and modern Chinese and foreign celebrities, and well-known theorems and formulas to prove the scumbags of arguments.

Because the materials cited in the reasoning argument are all scientific conclusions that have been confirmed by objective reality, or truths that have been recognized by people, they have the authority of theory and the profundity of thought, so they have irrefutable power and persuasive power. Citation-based argumentation is a kind of reasoning argument, that is, an argumentation method that cites famous sayings or celebrities' views and tombs as arguments, analyzes problems and explains the truth and disadvantages by citing scriptures.

1. Give examples to demonstrate.

Example argumentation is also called factual argumentation, that is, using true, reliable, and representative examples to prove the argument, specifically and effectively proving the central argument, enhancing the persuasiveness, interest, and authority of the article, and making the article easy to understand.

Exemplary argumentation is a method of argumentation from material to point of view, from individual to general, and is a form of reasoning that draws a common conclusion from the analysis and study of many individual things. In this way, it is generally a matter of first dividing the argument and then concluding it, that is, putting forward the thesis straight to the point, then using materials to prove the argument layer by layer around the topic, and finally summarizing the conclusion.

This method of structure is more in line with the laws of people's thinking and understanding. The facts enumerated in the argument using examples can take two forms, namely, generalizing facts and enumerating individual facts.

2. Reasoning argumentation.

The purpose of a reasoning argument is to prove that the argument is universal and regular. Since the argument is generally abstracted from the concrete material, its essence is the inductive method, and the inductive method is difficult to complete under many conditions, therefore, there is a theory to measure it, and its reliability can be guaranteed.

The logical form of reasoning argument is deductive reasoning, that is, the inductive arguments are measured by scientific principles known to mankind. In addition to citing universal principles and principles, theories from various disciplines can also serve as arguments.

3. Comparative argumentation.

Comparative argumentation is a method of argumentation from individual to individual. It is usually divided into two categories: one is analogy and the other is contrast.

Analogical argument. An analogical argument is based on the fact that two objects are the same or similar in some attributes, and it is inferred that the two are also identical or similar in other attributes. Analogical argument belongs to accidental reasoning, which is a way of reasoning from special to special and from individual to individual, and its conclusions are not necessarily true, but only have a certain degree of reliability.

In some cases, it is sometimes not possible to obtain a more precise argument.

Contrasting arguments. Comparative argument is a way of thinking about differences, which focuses on revealing the essence of the argument to be argued from the comparison of the opposite or different properties of things.

There are several issues to be paid attention to in the use of comparative arguments: First, the two sides of the comparison should be comparable. Second, it is necessary to establish a reasonable frame of reference.

To make a comparison, it is necessary to have a reasonable common frame of reference, without which the two cannot be compared. The so-called frame of reference refers to the criteria used to measure and determine the strengths and weaknesses of both sides, and such criteria must be objective, otherwise the conclusions of the comparison may not be reliable.

4. Figurative argument.

Figurative argument is to use metaphor as an argument, and use the reason of the parabler to demonstrate the reason of the person being compared (thesis). In a figurative argument, the metaphorist is a set of figurative examples, which contain certain relationships and truths, while the metaphorist is an abstract truth. Although the parables and the analogized are two different kinds of things, there is a common general principle between them, so there is a reasoning relationship between them.

A figurative argument is an argument in which the parabler uses the parabler as an argument to resist the argument of the anabolic person (thesis).

Summary. Arguments are the basis for proving an argument, including Taoist arguments and factual arguments. This is easy to understand, the Taoist theory includes famous sayings, axiomatic theorems and so on, as well as one's own rational perception of the world.

The factual arguments are examples. Argumentation is the process of proving an argument with evidence. Including reasoning arguments, metaphorical arguments, contrastive arguments, and example arguments.

For example, if an example is used in the process of proof in a paragraph, it is an example argument; Quoting a famous saying, it is a rational argument; What is proved by means of parables is figurative argument; What is proved by comparison is a comparative argument.

I've seen your question and I'm typing oh wait a moment Arguments are the basis for proving arguments, including Taoist arguments and factual arguments. This is easy to understand, the Taoist theory includes famous sayings, axioms and theorems, and one's own rational perception of the world. The factual arguments are examples.

Argumentation is the process by which Jing Shan proves an argument with evidence. Including reasoning arguments, metaphorical arguments, contrastive arguments, and example arguments. For example, if an example is used in the process of proof in a paragraph, it is an example argument; Quoting a famous saying, it is a rational argument; What is proved by means of metaphor is the proof of the figurative theory; What is proved by comparison is a comparative argument.

Summary. Factual arguments are mainly based on real and common things, while facts are mainly based on quoting some famous quotes and statements with certain truths.

Factual arguments are true descriptions and generalizations of objective things, with the character of direct reality, so they are the most convincing arguments to prove arguments, factual arguments include specific examples, generalized facts, statistics, personal experience, and so on.

What is the difference between a factual argument and a reasoning argument?

Hello, I am Xiao Ai, an electronic consultant, and I am happy to answer for you Please later, I am working hard to sort out the answer for you, and I will reply to you soon

The front pays attention to the facts, and the latter pays more attention to personal subjectivity.

Argument is the same as argument for reason.

The meaning of the facts.

The meaning of the reasoning argument.

The factual arguments are mainly based on real and universal things, while the dry arguments are mainly based on quoting some famous quotes and sentences with a certain amount of truth as arguments. 2.Factual arguments are true descriptions and generalizations of objective things, with the character of direct reality, so they are the most convincing arguments to prove arguments, factual arguments include specific examples, generalized facts, statistics, personal experience, and so on.

Reasoning arguments are proved by the incisive insights in classic works, the famous sayings and aphorisms of ancient and modern Chinese and foreign celebrities, and the commonly recognized theorems and formulas.