My husband didn t raise my wife, and now I m in my 50s, I don t want to work anymore, and you want u

In terms of the country's laws, the father-in-law let you raise him, which is also his right, but he has not raised your wife, from the perspective of the country, you have the responsibility to support him, but you have self-reliance in your 50s, and you don't need to raise your ability, and now you are retired until you are in your 60s, and you don't want to work at the age of 50.

Your father-in-law just didn't support your wife, but your wife also has the responsibility and obligation given to her by law to support the elderly, which is a responsibility that cannot be shirked.

If your father-in-law has never raised your wife, and now he is in his 50s and wants you to raise it, it is impossible, and there is no way to gain without paying.

In this case, I think you still have the obligation to support the elderly, even if he doesn't have a lover to support you. But you are obliged to support him.

My father-in-law didn't raise your wife, and now I'm in my 50s, I don't want to work anymore, I want you to raise it, so I can't blame my father-in-law, I have to find my own reasons, why don't you raise your wife? As a man, you should stand up to the sky, and you are the pillar of the family.

Even if your father-in-law does not raise your wife, they are also parents and father-daughters, and now they don't want to work, you should have the obligation to support him.

If the other party does not have the obligation to support the elderly, then your wife can also have no obligation to support the elderly, and whether you support the elderly or not depends on whether you have love or not.

Although my father-in-law has never raised your wife, he is still his father after all, so it is your responsibility to provide for him in his old age, so treat him well.

He didn't raise your wife, but he is also your wife's father, and he also has his fertility grace, and it is natural for children to raise their parents.

Although your father-in-law has not raised your wife, after all, after giving birth to your wife, legally speaking, you should still have the responsibility to support you.

Children have the obligation to support the elderly.

It's better for your children to stay by your side, and it has nothing to do with interests, but if you think you can't bring it well, it's better to give it to your parents-in-law, after all, you will marry again, and then you will have another child.

Keeping the child with you means that you have to consider it for him and give him time and effort, if you can do it, you can stay, if you can't do it, then give it to your parents-in-law, don't ruin the child, you can also go over to see the child occasionally.

On the one hand, your parents-in-law raise a child for you to make it convenient, on the other hand, their daughter has just passed away, and they will cherish all the things related to their daughter, as if their daughter is still around, due to grief. Your son is also a thought of theirs.

One of the consequences of your child staying with his parents-in-law is that he will definitely not be too close to you in the future, and will even refuse to call you father in serious cases, and the father-son relationship is in name only.

How old is the child? Have you asked your child for their opinion?

If your parents-in-law don't have any other children, you can try to raise your son! Because the old man's idea is very simple, and he only pins his heart on his daughter on his grandson, and the old man has no other ideas, no matter whether their property can be given to your son after a hundred years, you have to honor them! After all, their daughter gave birth to you and lived with you!

It's easy to think about it from a different perspective.

Agree or disagree that you can express your position, no matter who raises your son, there are pros and cons, you raise your son to facilitate the cultivation of feelings, but also conducive to the growth of the child, if you say that your parents will raise you, the child will be unfamiliar with you in the future, and there may be certain weaknesses when you grow up, but you can save a lot of time to do your business, no matter who raises it, the child will still be your son when he grows up. Once you understand these truths, you weigh the pros and cons, and you will know what to do. I hope my words can help you.

Your wife and brother? If your wife is an only child and your parents-in-law want to raise your son, then raise them, your son is also a thought for your father-in-law. Even if you are married, you must be as good as ever to your current father-in-law and mother-in-law, there are not many such parents, and bringing you children is also a kind of sustenance for their daughter

I think it's okay, since you're married to your wife, you have a kinship relationship with her, as long as you really want to take care of your wife's feelings, and you can rest assured of their care.

Your wife has passed away, your children are still young, and you are still young. You have to think about this situation. You're still young, you can't stop looking for a stepwife for your son, and if you look for it again, it's a second marriage, and it's hard for a woman to accept a boy, unless you're very rich.

The parents-in-law are also the immediate relatives of the children, and I personally think that the requirements they put forward are okay, and they will only be good to the children. As for the custody of the child, it doesn't matter, anyway, the son is yours, so why not. And the property of your father-in-law and mother-in-law, you don't have to worry about it, they must have their own plans and arrangements, you just need to find a woman to live a good life next.

Good luck.

It mainly depends on the child's thoughts, or don't give it to the elderly, after all, it is their own flesh and blood, and the old man will not educate the current children.

It's completely okay, after all, they take care of them better than you, and they are their own grandchildren, they won't treat their children badly, and they won't affect your remarriage, and you don't have to worry about your stepmother treating him badly, you can also care about your children the same, the best of both worlds!

Treat your parents-in-law well, you are a blessed person!

As long as the custody is yours.

Although your wife died, it is a very sad thing, the child is also unfortunate without a mother, you have such a father-in-law and mother-in-law is really your blessing, you really don't think too much about them are really for your good, but also for your son's good, they will be better for your son without a daughter, you don't have to worry about this, you just have to take more time to care about your son, as long as you are free, so that the relationship between father and son will not alienate you, father-in-law and mother-in-law are old, you also have to care more.

First of all, it depends on whether your father-in-law and mother-in-law have a son, in case the child is wronged! Look at their economic conditions, after all, it costs a lot of money to raise a child!

Now they are all only children, your father-in-law and mother-in-law are old and have lost their daughters, as a son-in-law, you should be treated the same as your biological parents, and I think it's okay to raise your son

It's good, the key depends on yourself, isn't your son still your son, isn't your father-in-law and mother-in-law still your father-in-law, does it feel like you've changed just because your wife has passed away?

I think that if the child is older, you have to respect the child's decision.

Journey to the West (1993 TV series), a TV series to commemorate the 40th anniversary of the launch of Nippon TV in 1993, starring Masahiro Motoki and Rie Miyazawa.

It is legal and reasonable, because the mother-in-law gave your wife life and raised her. Of course, the son may spend more money, but after so many years, there are more sons when taking care of them, and now there is only one mother-in-law left, and it is not too much for the son to propose to share it equally.

As the saying goes: It is difficult for a clean official to decide family affairs, and I don't know what the situation of your family is.

If you sisters have a good relationship with each other, don't care about each other, and are fighting to support the elderly, then this is also reasonable.

If the relationship is not very harmonious, you should appoint a notary public to write a maintenance agreement and a future property distribution agreement to avoid unnecessary disputes in the future.

Personally, I don't think it's reasonable, but if you can afford it, you can still fund it.

Of course, it is reasonable that supporting the elderly is the responsibility and obligation of the children, whether it is a son or a daughter, and if anyone does not support the elderly, the elderly can file a lawsuit in court.

It is reasonable that both men and women have an obligation to support the elderly.

During the marriage, you owe your father-in-law 3,000 yuan, and now that you are divorced, it is a personal debt and should be repaid.

My ex-wife said that I owe her father 3,000 deductions for my daughter's child support, which is "improper and illegal, you can sue her."

The problem is that the marriage that has already broken down will be exacerbated by your lawsuit against her, and she may be going to take her father-in-law, your father-in-law, to court for the $3,000 you borrowed from him.

Do you think it's worth it?!

If it is a man, take on the debt, and even if the children should be shared equally with the wife, they must have the responsibility and courage of a man, and don't add to the blockage of this relationship.

No matter what the reason for the divorce, you still have a daughter, don't sue her for this money, big husband, stand up to the sky, don't let money lower your personality.

It is natural to repay debts, no matter what, you have to pay back, and it is also money to make up for living expenses, no matter how you calculate it, it is the same, I think it can.

If you really owe someone money, then it is natural to repay the debt, and I advise you not to sue her, Nan Wuwu Immortal Buddha.

3,000 yuan is not worth going to court, she has to pay you back, and she will pay back 1,500 yuan, because it is the duration of the marriage, and the two of them share it.

You have the right to file a lawsuit with the people's court.

Legally, you have a question involving the set-off of claims and debts.

According to Article 99 of the Contract Law of the People's Republic of China, if the parties bear each other's debts due to each other, and the subject matter of the debts is of the same type and quality, either party may offset its own debts with the debts of the other party, except where it is not allowed to be offset in accordance with the provisions of the law or in accordance with the nature of the contract. Where a party claims set-off, it shall notify the other party.

The notice is effective upon arrival at the other party. There shall be no conditions or time limits attached to set-offs. According to Article 100 of the Contract Law of the People's Republic of China:

Where the parties owe debts to each other, and the type and quality of the subject matter are different, they may also be offset upon mutual agreement.

According to the above-mentioned legal provisions, generally speaking, your ex-wife's claim does not constitute a set-off, on the one hand, because it does not meet the requirements for mutual debts, and on the other hand, although both are monetary debts, maintenance is an expense necessary to ensure the basic life and growth of the minor, and if it is allowed to be set-off, it will damage the legitimate rights and interests of the minor.

Therefore, you have the right to sue your ex-wife for that part of the maintenance, and if you have financial difficulties, you can seek free legal aid from a legal aid agency.

No, it is only natural to repay debts.

There is still no need to do this, and there is not much money, so why bother with it.

Why do you still have the face to ask for money?!! Even if you don't pay child support, you won't have the face to sue.

I don't want to pay back the money I owe, and I want to say goodbye! It's the first time I've seen this kind of strange manhood! And also unashamed to say it online! Don't you feel ashamed?

Historical stories about Cao Cao:

1. Chen Liu's troops:

In the sixth year of Zhongping (189), Emperor Ling of the Han Dynasty died, the crown prince Liu Wei ascended the throne, and the Empress Dowager He listened to the government. The general He Jin wanted to take advantage of the death of Emperor Ling and the loss of power of the eunuchs to destroy the Ten Standing Attendants, but he did not obtain the support of the Empress Dowager He. So He Jin summoned Dong Zhuo, who was then the pastor of the state, to Beijing and coerced the Empress Dowager He to agree.

However, this move startled the snake, Dong Zhuo has not yet arrived in the capital, and He Jin has been attacked by the eunuchs**.

In September of the same year, Dong Zhuo entered Beijing, took charge of the government, abolished Emperor Shao of the Han Dynasty as the King of Hongnong, and renamed his younger brother King Chen Liuwang as the Emperor of Han Xian, and sent someone to poison the mother and son of the King of Hongnong, calling himself the Taishi, specializing in court politics. Cao Cao saw that Dong Zhuo was perverse and unwilling to cooperate with him, so he changed his name and fled from Luoyang (now Luoyangdong). After Cao Cao arrived in Chenliu, he "scattered his wealth and joined the righteous soldiers", and first advocated the volunteers to call on the heroes of the world to crusade against Dong Zhuo.

2. Chase the Central Plains:

In the autumn of the fourth year of Chuping (193), Cao Cao's father Cao Song was killed by Tao Qian's troops on the way to Cao Cao, and Cao Cao then marched into Xuzhou (Zhitan, now Tancheng, Shandong) to expand his power to the southeast. Tao Qian retreated to Tan County. Soon Cao Cao's army was exhausted and retreated back to the army.

In the summer of the following year, Cao Cao conquered Xuzhou again and went to the East China Sea.

During Cao Cao's expedition to Xuzhou, he killed a lot, and along the way, "the chickens and dogs were exhausted, and there were no pedestrians in the ruins". The Dongjun garrison Chen Gong was dissatisfied with Cao Cao, so he conspired with Chen Liutaishou Zhang Miao, Zhang Miao's brother Zhang Chao, Zhonglang Xu Yan and Wang Kai to rebel, and welcomed Lu Bu as the pastor of Yanzhou. Lu Bu was a famous general at that time, first as Dong Zhuo's general, and then with Wang Yunding, he planned to kill Dong Zhuo.

3. Expedition to Wuhuan:

In the seventh year of Jian'an (202), Yuan Shao died of illness, and Yuan Shao's two sons, Yuan Tan and Yuan Shang, were at odds and had a fight. Yuan Tan was defeated by Yuan Shang and surrendered to Cao Cao.

In February of the ninth year of Jian'an (204), Cao Cao took advantage of Yuan Shang's dispatch of troops to attack Yuan Tan and marched to besiege Yecheng (now Handan, Hebei Province, in the area of Linzhangxi). Yuan Shang led the army back to the rescue, relying on Fushui (now Fuyang River) as a camp, and Cao Cao marched to surround his camp. Yuan Shang was frightened and asked for surrender, but Cao Cao did not allow it.

Yuan Shang fled by night, and Yuan's army was scattered. Yuan Shang fled to Zhongshan (present-day Dingxian, Hebei).

Cao Cao ordered people to take the seal ribbon of the captured Yuan Shang to surrender the defenders of Yecheng, and the fighting spirit in the city collapsed. Yecheng was then breached by Cao Cao. From this year onwards, Cao Cao moved his stronghold north to Yecheng, Jizhou, and ordered the army to come out from here, while Xu County, the capital of Emperor Xian of the Han Dynasty, left only a few officials.

4. Pingding Liangzhou:

After the defeat of Chibi, Cao Cao took some measures to stabilize the interior. In the spring of the fifteenth year of Jian'an, Cao Cao issued the "Order to Seek Talents", saying: "Today's order has not yet been decided, and this special urgency to seek talents is also... The second and third sons are bright and ugly, and I am the only one who moves, and I have to use it.

Cao Cao put forward the policy of employing people without sticking to moral conduct and meritocracy, with the purpose of collecting talents to his side as much as possible.

In the sixteenth year of Jian'an (211), Cao Cao began to use troops against Guanzhong. In March, Cao Cao sent the commander of the school, Zhong Xuan, to lead the general Xiahou Yuan to march into Guanzhong in the name of crusading against Zhang Lu in Hanzhong (Zhinan Zheng, now Hanzhong, Shaanxi). Guanzhong Ma Chao, Han Sui, Yang Qiu and other ten were suspicious and turned against each other for a while.

Cao Cao immediately sent the general Cao Ren to attack Guanzhong, and Ma Chao and others were stationed in Tongguan.