Can the quality change the speed of time 110

e=m*c^2

In special relativity, time dilation (also known as Einstein's delay): t=t0 (1-(v c)) 2) ;

Relativistic energy: The mass of the object increases when it moves, and there will be kinetic energy when it moves, and both mass and kinetic energy increase with the increase of velocity, total energy = rest energy + kinetic energy. Here m=m0 (1-(v c)) 2) ;

It follows from this that for a moving object according to the theory of relativity, time dilation is proportional to mass!

And just as SKK556 says, in essence, it is not the mass but the motion that determines the speed of time, but according to the point of view of special relativity, the mass of an object will change with motion, so the speed of time can be changed by the change of mass!

To sum up, the proposition holds.

The mass and energy of the object correspond to it, and when the mass of the object changes, the amount of energy corresponding to it changes, and the mass has nothing to do with the change of time, so the change of mass does not lead to the change of time.

Theoretically, Einstein's theory of relativity proved that velocity affects time, and velocity is related to mass energy, so time can be changed by converting mass, as explained by the brother upstairs.

But the question of time is still unsolved, and now the whole edifice of microphysics is built on the theory of relativity, and many theories need to be proved by a lot of experiments.

This building is in jeopardy, because physics today is all about hypothesizing theories and then experimentally proving that one day the future is unimaginable.

One person, one shocking experiment, can overturn an entire building.

Nature is mysterious, only time will give you the answer, if you think that time can be affected by mass, then you go and gain weight now, you will age slowly, haha.

It implies two aspects: for a moving object it is exactly as relativistic as described above (I emphasize here); But when we only look at the reality of mass, we say that conceptually it is only a basic property of an object, that it absolutely cannot change time in a relatively static state, that it is only a state of existence of matter, and that a given state of existence is stable in philosophy, otherwise the system is unstable (we are talking about the natural phenomenon of celestial bodies).

No matter how large an object is, it is impossible to have any effect on space-time without interaction, even when it is in the case of relativity, it is actually impossible, because this change in time is only relative to the observer, and the cause of this change has nothing to do with the mass of the object itself, because it is not determined by the factors of the object itself, only by motion. In general: mass cannot change the speed of time, this is the effect of motion and not mass, and it is not mass but motion that determines speed.

Otherwise, this is ridiculous, is it possible that a fat man is superior to a thin man? No!

OK. In general relativity, the gravitational force produced by mass is described as a change in the four-dimensional space-time gauge, including time.

To put it simply, quality slows down time.

Yes. The greater the mass, the slower the space time is comparatively slower.

Yes, it's just not obvious, it's talked about in the theory of relativity!

The mass of an object is generally conserved, and it cannot act directly on any frame of reference and change the time in which they are located.

Or maybe your question is vague and lacks the necessary information.

According to Einstein's theory of relativity, the closer you get to a massive object, the slower time becomes, as you can see in A Brief History of Time

The world is made up of space and time, which do not affect each other, so time and quality cannot be compared.

You're talking about free fall? Experiments where two balls land at the same time can be known to be unaffected.

In short, it didn't matter.

The greater the mass, the slower the relative time, and the greater the speed, the slower the relative time.

Einstein said yes, and I didn't verify ......

It should be the speed at which time changes the mass = =+, look at the theory of relativity for yourself.

I think it can distort time.

Gravitational factories have an impact on time.

An increase in mass leads to a slower passage of time, which is relative, for example.

When you throw the stone in your hand into the calm water, the water will be flooded, the water surface will be pulled, and the surface area will increase.

We live in a four-dimensional space, and time counts as one-dimensional.

When a huge star exists in space, it not only pulls on three-dimensional space, but also plays a pull on time.

The distance of time passes becomes larger, so that time slows down for a long time.

But this is relative, if you live on such an astral body, you should not feel that time is slowing down.

This is similar to the fact that the faster the speed, the slower the time passes.

What he basically means is that a certain mass can distort space, like smashing a nest in the ground, it is different from a plane, so time will be slower. Personal opinion ha.

The theory of relativity rejects modified energy: the mass of the object increases when it moves, and at the same time there will be kinetic energy when it moves, and both mass and kinetic energy increase with the increase of velocity, and the total energy is equal to the energy at rest plus kinetic energy.

So for a moving object, according to the theory of relativity, time dilation is proportional to mass.

Essentially, it is not the mass but the motion that determines the speed of time, but according to the special theory of relativity, the mass of an object changes with motion, so the speed of time can be changed by the change of mass.

The mass of the object increases with increasing velocity.

See how it stopped. It can only be relative, such as when your time stops in the outside world, or when the outside world stops in your frame of reference. (It's actually impossible to stop, there's no point in time stopping!)

It has no physical meaning) time can only be "infinitely slowed down". If it's the effect of speed, then of course the mass will also increase. （m=m。

（1-v^2/c^2))

The approximate halt of time due to gravity, such as the surface of a black hole, is complicated.

The answer you need is: time cannot stop.

Think about it, if your time "stops", you "stop" with it. It doesn't make sense when the time "restores". For you, nothing happened.

In fact, the most likely thing is that time slows down to infinity, but in the eyes of the "parties", the events and times around it are changing at a normal speed.

Because the change of time and space is "relative". It is a mutually exclusive conclusion between two different coordinate systems that results from the description of the same event.

Time is relative, if time around an object stops, it means that its speed is infinitely close to the speed of light, and according to Einstein's equations, the mass of the object will approach infinity, so it becomes heavier.

According to the theory of relativity, the mass of an object changes only due to the change in velocity, so the mass of time stop should not change.

Mass and energy are different manifestations of the same thing, but it cannot be said that "elementary particles are energy".

The extra part of the quality is the quality.

Because you have always held an absolute view of space-time, and do not think that space-time is related to the movement of matter, these questions are difficult to understand.

If the speed of an object increases all the time, when it increases to the speed of light, the mass is so great that it is not difficult to change its speed significantly if it is pushed with a limited force, so that the speed does not increase to the speed of light.

The theory of relativity is contrary to people's daily experience, it is the result of purely rational thinking, it is logical reasoning, and it is naturally difficult to understand.

The last question is not clear to me, it has no reasonable explanation at all.

When he ** was in the form of particles, so those substances were particles, and since they were particles, they could move at the speed of light.

Einstein knew it wasn't what he said!!

m=m0 finger [1-(v c)].

m0 is the rest mass, v is the velocity, c is the speed of light, v 2 = vx 2 + vy 2 + vz 2 (v is the vector, the square of the velocity is equal to the sum of the squares of the components of each royal noise).