What is Management Range? The concept of managing amplitude

Manage the range. The number of subordinates under the direct supervision of a leader.

There is a limit to the number of leaders who can effectively lead their subordinates because of the limitations of their energy, knowledge, economy, and other conditions, and beyond a certain limit, they will not be able to exercise concrete and effective leadership.

The number of subordinates that a leader can directly and effectively lead is called the effective management range. The main conditions that determine the effective management range are:

1) The complexity of the problem and the amount of work to be done.

2) The level of quality of the leader and his subordinates.

3) Level of standardization and degree of authorization.

Management Margin The so-called management range, also known as management width, refers to the number of subordinates that managers can directly manage or control in an organizational structure. Management scientist Graicunas points out that when a subordinate is added, the number of direct individual contacts increases by arithmetic progression, while the corresponding total number of contacts, due to the addition of direct group connections and cross-connections, increases exponentially in proportion.

According to Granciunas, the range of control should be limited to "a maximum of five, possibly preferably four". However, there is an exception to this rule, which is that when performing routine work at the grassroots level of the organization, employees have less contact than people in other departments, and supervision is less complex, so there can be a wider range of control. The upper echelons of the organization are very different.

For enterprises, the following influencing factors need to be considered in determining the management range:

1.The degree to which the plan is well developed. If there is a good and complete plan in advance, and the staff are clear about their respective goals and tasks, and are clear about the business activities they should engage in, then the supervisor does not have to spend too much energy and time to guide and correct deviations, so the scope of supervision of the supervisor can be larger, the management range is larger, and the management level is relatively less; Conversely, if the plan is not clear and specific, it will limit the scope of a manager's jurisdiction, and the scope of management will be relatively small.

2.The complexity of the task. If the tasks often faced by the supervisor are more complex, more difficult to solve, and have a greater impact on the activities of the enterprise, the number of people under his direct supervision should not be too large; On the contrary, the scope of management can be increased.

3.The level of experience and knowledge of the company's employees. When the management personnel have strong quality and rich management experience, they can appropriately increase their workload and increase the scope of management without reducing efficiency; In the same way, subordinates who are well-trained and highly conscious can also adopt a larger range of management, so that they can exercise self-management and creativity to a greater extent.

4.The degree of coordination required to complete the work task. If the work task requires a high degree of coordination within each department or within a department, the scope of management should be reduced and a taller structure should be used.

5.The status of the company's information communication channels. When the communication channels of the enterprise are smooth, the means of communication are advanced, and the information is transmitted in a timely manner, the management range can be increased.

Concept]: The so-called management range, also known as management width, refers to the number of subordinates that managers can directly manage or control in an organizational structure. This number is limited, and when this limit is exceeded, the efficiency of management will decrease.

Therefore, in order to effectively lead subordinates, managers must seriously consider the question of how many subordinates they can directly supervise, that is, the issue of management range.

Influencing Factors]:

To synthesize and carry forward the advantages of the two basic organizational forms, it is necessary to determine a reasonable management level and management range. Since the level of management depends on the magnitude of management, the latter is the main aspect of the contradiction.

When specifically establishing the management range and level of the organization, we only need to grasp the following relationships:

1. In the case of being determined by the manager, the management amplitude is inversely proportional to the management level, that is, the larger the management amplitude, the less the management level; Conversely, the smaller the management amplitude, the more layers of management.

2. The scope of management is related to the degree of difficulty and standardization of government affairs and affairs under management. The more difficult and non-standard the management of affairs, the smaller the scope of management is required; If the management of affairs is relatively easy, standardized, stable, small change, and does not require creativity, the management range can be larger.

3. The management range is related to the level of managers and the advanced degree of management tools. If the level of managers is high and the management methods are advanced, the management range can be larger. Otherwise, it can be smaller.

4 The extent of management is related to the object being managed. The management is of high quality, strong sense of responsibility, can work independently and be loyal to the organization, and the management range can be larger. Otherwise, it can be smaller.

5. Different management levels and nature of work. There should also be differences in the scope of management.

6. The scope of management is related to the soundness of organizational regulations. For an organization with sound regulations and procedures, the range can be larger. **In.

Management range: refers to the amount of departments or personnel directly led by the leading organ or leader.

Management level: refers to the amount of management level divided within a public organization.

Simply put, it is the number of subordinates of the manager.

The management range, also known as the management span and management width, refers to the number of direct reports that the manager can effectively manage. The number of people is wide and the number of people is narrow. The management level refers to the different management levels in the Bique organization according to the principle of unified command.

The finite scope of management leads to the creation of management levels. It can be seen that there is a direct relationship between the management range and the management level. In the case that the size of the organization has been determined, the management magnitude is inversely proportional to the management level.

The wider the management range, the fewer the management levels; Conversely, the narrower the scope of management, the more layers of management. There is an inverse relationship between the two (this pure inverse relationship between the two determines the two most basic types of organizational structures: flat structure and high structure.

The flat structure is characterized by wide management range and few management levels, this type of management personnel is less, management costs are low, information transmission and modulation speed is fast and not easy to distort, and decision-making is rapid; Its disadvantage is that the superior cannot fully provide operational guidance and supervision and control to the subordinate, and at the same time, due to the large number of affairs, it is not conducive to exceptional management. The characteristics of the high-level structure are that the management range is narrow and the management level is many, and the supervisors can effectively and fully guide and supervise the subordinates, which is also conducive to the exceptional management of senior leaders, but there are more management personnel, more management costs, and too many levels lead to slow decision-making).

1. Behavioral Science:

The first definition is a very broad one, arguing that behavioral science studies the behavior of both humans and animals; The second definition is a narrow definition, which actually regards behavioral science as a management discipline, and the object of study is the work behavior of people in the work environment; The third definition of selling rocks is somewhere in between, arguing that the behavior of people who are the subject of behavioral science research does not include the behavior of animals, but is not limited to work behavior in the work environment, but also includes general social behavior outside of work.

2. Management level and management range:

The management range refers to the number of subordinate personnel or institutions directly managed by a person or organization, also known as the control range of the Tomb. Management hierarchy refers to the number of management levels that an organization divides vertically. Under the condition that the number of managed objects is determined, the relationship between the two is inversely proportional; The wider the management range, the fewer management levels need to be set; Conversely, the narrower the management range, the more management levels need to be set.

The management hierarchy is the number of management positions set between the top executive and the operator of the organization.