The glass collection worth 450,000 yuan was damaged by the bear child, should the parents compensate

Parents should compensate. First of all, no matter how much this work of art is worth, at least it is the work that the author has spent his heart and soul to reflect its value. Secondly, parents, as the guardians of the children, are responsible for all the actions of the children, and since the damage should be compensated.

In the end, only through painful efforts can we give a profound lesson to the bear children and bear parents, and society is not what your family wants to do.

I think it should be compensated, anyway, it was my own child who broke the thing, so I should compensate.

Parents need to pay compensation because parents are the guardians of their children and are jointly and severally liable for their children's actions.

I think compensation should be given, the bear child is not sensible, the parents should be blamed for not managing well, or the education is not good, and the parents should also be responsible.

Of course, it should be compensated, because parents are the guardians of their children, and parents have to go to jail for their children in special circumstances.

Recently, the Dream Glass Castle, created by Arribas' artist brothers, was damaged when two children jumped over a fence and crashed into a display case. I believe that most people are very sad to hear this news, after all, art is extremely precious, and it is possible that once damaged, it will never be again. In addition to the heartache, there is also a question, the glass collection worth 450,000 yuan was damaged by the bear child, should the parents compensate?

I believe that parents should be held liable for compensation in this matter, both from a reasonable and legal perspective.

Logically:In this case, parents have failed to fulfill their duty to protect the artwork and supervise their children, and they are responsible and obliged to compensate. The so-called son does not teach, the father's fault, the child is not sensible, and the parents cannot be ignorant.

In recent years, the phenomenon of bear children damaging ** artworks has also occurred from time to time, although the damage is caused by children, but parents are to blame after all. Children are still young, lack a clear understanding of many things, and do not have the ability to distinguish between right and wrong. At this time, as a parent, it should play a role in education, guidance and supervision, since it is to go to the first art, then the protection of artwork should be put in the first place, and it is also the obligation of taking care of the children.

After the incident, parents should educate and encourage children to take the initiative to admit their mistakes and bear the corresponding consequences, which is not only a respect for the artwork, but also helps the child to form a correct view of right and wrong, and learn to take the initiative to admit mistakes and bear the corresponding consequences after making mistakes on the road of life in the future. Parents take the initiative to bear the responsibility of compensation, which can be regarded as an explanation to the majority of art lovers. <>

From a legal point of viewBoth the Tort Liability Law and the Civil Code provide that "if a person with no or limited capacity for civil conduct causes damage to others, the guardian shall bear the tort liability."

Where guardians fulfill their guardianship responsibilities, their tort liability may be reduced. In this case, the guardian did not play the duty of guardianship and should therefore bear the responsibility of compensation. <>

I think parents should compensate, since you can bring your child to this kind of place, you should be responsible for the child's behavior.