Which brands and models of high powered telescopes can be connected to a Nikon DSLR D90 ? Best valu

Updated on number 2024-04-02
28 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    Galileo. High-end such as the Swarovski Wonder Bird Watching Telescope. You can clearly see the object you want to see within the effective distance:

    Just in case. This high-power telescope is also available in different brands, with an exit pupil distance of 3 mm, which can be used for sightseeing: it is better to add a photographic sleeve to avoid high magnification situations.

    Not more than 4"。High power telescopeWe say, ED is the best optical technology in China? Another thing to note is that the DSLR camera needs to be connected with a snap ring.

    However, don't report too much hope for results. Not an original lens after all.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    Then you choose Nikon's ED82, the main unit is equipped with 25-75 eyepieces and sleeves. This exit pupil aperture objective lens aperture 82mm field of view has been focused recently, **There is about a set of 30,000 on the market. It's a dual-purpose mirror for bird watching and astronomy, and I personally think it's more affordable!

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    In addition to the original lens, the most commonly used sub-factory head of the high magnification lens should be the two major brands of Tamron and Sigma, D90

    It is a mid-range model. Tamron 70-200mm is recommended

    Best value for money. **Around 5000. Constant has a good bokeh. It's also very good. That's right.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    Entry-level Nikon is more affordable, 10000 lenses are stabilized, but Canon only has a very expensive red-circled lens to stabilize the image, and Canon's lens group is extremely powerful, and the high-end Canon is about 2000 yuan cheaper than Nikon.

    If you shoot landscapes, the Canon effect is soft, Nikon is sharp, Canon shoots people, Nikon shoots landscapes.

    Now, the most cost-effective should be Nikon D90, a generation of machine kings, which has been discontinued, and it should be bottomed out. If money isn't an issue, you can get the Nikon D7000. Great machine, I'm using it, ** around 8500.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    If you purely talk about cost performance, Pentax is cost-effective, and the entry-level Canon is also very cost-effective.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    SLR is, of course, Canon's best, 7D is recommended, and it is the advantage of 7D to capture the moving body, with continuous shooting up to 8 frames per second, magnesium alloy body and 150,000 shutters, which is enough to use for a few years! Changing to a telephoto lens is more stable than the entry-level camera; Reliability has improved a lot. The overall workmanship is solid and durable, and it is worthy of being a high-end professional SLR machine.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    Binder's can·· And the replacement of the head is not other cheap·· 3 princess · The hotter model right now is the K-R

  8. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    How much does the Nikon D90 Home Edition cost.

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    Home SLR D90 fully meets your requirements, it can be seen from its sales volume is a very popular machine, D90+18-105VR home is not professional, professional to use a full pair.

  10. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    No more than 20,000 cameras and lenses are D90 plus zoom, or 50D plus zoom, photography technology is the main thing, equipment is not the primary condition, what you said about realistic imaging, shooting deformation is a technical problem, not a problem of equipment quality.

  11. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    It is highly recommended to choose Canon's 1000D, a very good machine, you have all the functions you said, the main point, and the most attractive is that it has a super high cost performance.

    As for the concert shooting and shooting in low light, I am more experienced in this, that is, within your financial range, try to choose a lens with a relatively large aperture, which is conducive to shooting in low light.

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    See what you want for it.

    Canon's sense of hierarchy is good, Shooting portrait sketches is good, Nikon's sharpness is high and the contrast is large, Shooting scenery is good, and the lenses of these two companies are also + can telephoto portraits are good, NK wide-angle scenery is good, the machine level is not very important, it is a difference in feel, don't save money on the lens.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    Canon's sense of hierarchy is good, good for portraits, such as 450D, Nikon's sharpness is high, the contrast is large, the scenery is good, I highly recommend the D90 I bought before, the D80 was not out of the D90 at that time (with photography function) Very good, in addition, this lens D80 Standard 18-135 is very good Generally enough.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    Pentax K20D, I just bought one, cheap, strong performance, you can find the detailed parameters yourself, those who have used film like his lens, beautiful.

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    Nikon D90 18-135 basically meets daily use, and if you have free silver, you can get a D300, which is more expensive.

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-23

    The Canon D500 does not exceed 10,000 units.

    Very cost-effective new model Jackie Chan endorsed brand Oh will definitely not disappoint you I plan to buy it too.

  17. Anonymous users2024-01-22

    Nikon D80 bar. Due to the launch of the D90, the D80 has dropped to a relatively low **, and the cost performance has increased. Set at the level of 6,000 yuan.

    The D80 set of 18 135 lenses includes the optimal focal length for 85mm portraits, which is suitable for your needs. Its excellent light sensitivity and noise control are suitable for use in different environments. As for the telephoto lens, I don't know very well, but I guess using a 300mm lens will be able to meet most of the uses.

    If you can't buy an astronomical telescope There are also cameras of the same level: Canon EOS 40D, Nikon D90. Hope the above information can be helpful to you.

  18. Anonymous users2024-01-21

    Nikon D7000+18-105 set. It can be multi-,**7600 or so.

    There is also D90, it can also be multi-**, the set is now less than 6000, this machine is too old, it is better not to buy it.

  19. Anonymous users2024-01-20

    Double**,It's a very ordinary function.。 I'm a Pentax K5 user, and the whole Pentax series has multiple ** features. The cheapest K30 set is just over 2000.

  20. Anonymous users2024-01-19

    Generally, these two brands of SLR machines have the function of secondary **. For example, Nikon's D7000, etc.

  21. Anonymous users2024-01-18

    All Nikon models now have a multiple**.

  22. Anonymous users2024-01-17

    What is the budget for a newbie?

    4000 Class: Nikon D3100 set, no one, Nikon's low-end sleeve 18-55 is recognized as excellent.

    5000-6000 level: Nikon D3100 stand-alone +18-105, more than 4500 or so (the reason is the same as above), Nikon D5100, the most outstanding machine of this level, with 18-105 sleeve** about 5600-5800.

    6000-7000 level: D90 set. The old is always the most owned body in the market at this level, with impeccable performance and a standard mid-range machine.

    7000-8000 level: Canon 60D (Canon only starts from 60D, it is worthy of the words "moved always"), Nikon D7000, good machine, but the set of machines exceeds the budget by several hundred, D7000 + 18-105 sets are estimated to be no less than 8300-8500

    Level above 8000: grit your teeth and add money to the full set. Canon lenses start with the red circle, and Nikon can choose lenses with n characters.

    Pentax is not a die-hard binder fan, don't think about it, it's not a machine to buy, it's a memory.

    Samsung SLR has recently come alive again, but it is not considered, there is a problem with the level.

    Everything that needs to be said is said, landlord, you can decide for yourself.

  23. Anonymous users2024-01-16

    DSLRs, Canon, and Nikon are good.

    From the Canon series, the entry machine is 550D, but it is recommended that you choose 60D, which is better, it is a mid-range entry machine, and the screen can be folded to shoot some creative **, which is also more in line with the usage habits of ordinary people, it should be said that it is a cost-effective machine.

    Here are a few ** recommendations for you:

    Under 5000, the Canon 550D comes with an 18-135 lens or the Nikon D3200 comes with an 18-105 lens.

    Within 7000, the Nikon D90 or Canon 60D will be built.

    If it is higher, it is not recommended to use it as an entry machine.

    Canon's new 600D 650d has no advantage in terms of price/performance ratio.

  24. Anonymous users2024-01-15

    4000——6000.Consider Canon 550D, Nikon D31006000 - 8000 Consider Canon 650D, Nikon D51008000 - 10000 Consider Canon, Nikon D7000 Canon with 18 - 135 lenses, Nikon with 18 - 105 lenses.

  25. Anonymous users2024-01-14

    I feel that Canon is better, the lens is full, as for which one is good, it depends on how much you spend, 1D3 is Canon's top, the body is tens of thousands, super good, 7D is also a good machine, the body is about 9000 yuan, you look at it and buy it.

  26. Anonymous users2024-01-13

    Pentax can be considered, and if you are a novice, you will use the original dog head first, and then change the head when the technology goes up.

  27. Anonymous users2024-01-12

    Both Nikon and Canon are good. Generally, it is equipped with a lens as standard, but it only meets the basic needs. If you want to achieve good results in different occasions, you need to buy a separate lens. In fact, the SLR body itself is not expensive, but the investment in the lens is powerful.

  28. Anonymous users2024-01-11

    Canon, this one is good. A wide-angle lens can also be added.

Related questions
6 answers2024-04-02

The definition of your so-called high multiplier is not clear! Because it depends on what you're looking at. How far away ! >>>More

4 answers2024-04-02

Domestic telescope brands include Boguan, Xingtron, Forester, Esky, Yuzon, and Tucson. Wait. >>>More

5 answers2024-04-02

Beijing Galaxy Telescope Answer:

The gap between astronomical telescopes is very large, and our ordinary junior astronomy enthusiasts can choose non-professional mirrors (professional mirrors are very expensive, and they are generally used for professional observation). **In the 1000-2000 yuan or so low-end astronomical telescope can be, of course, if you are very passionate about astronomy, for the observation effect of high requirements, you must choose the high-end telescope, refraction and reflection have their own advantages and disadvantages, mainly depending on what you want to observe, choose the best one for yourself; >>>More

11 answers2024-04-02

There are many ways to classify optical microscopes: they can be divided into binocular and monocular microscopes according to the number of eyepieces used; Press whether the image is stereoscopic or not. >>>More

8 answers2024-04-02

1. When people buy telescopes, it is common to have several Arabic numerals on the price list, so what technical parameters do these numbers illustrate? Let's give an example of an interview. For example, it is marked with 10 50 mm 5°, which means that it has a diameter of 50 mm and a field of view of 5 degrees (i.e. at 1000). >>>More