There is no freedom in love, which is more important, love or freedom

Although love is selfish and sometimes even domineering, you should still give the other person some free personal space, otherwise she will be overwhelmed by you and may be bored with this kind of love. Everyone is an independent individual, don't interfere too much in her life, if she loves you, she naturally knows what to do and what not to do, and you should have confidence in her.

If you like her, don't care too much, it's yours who can't run, it's not yours, that's better, there is a chance to find someone who really appreciates you.

Compared with love and freedom, I personally think that love is more important, because the so-called freedom, surrounded by love, can also be enjoyed.

Because if you haven't experienced love in life, it means that your life is blank, after all, you don't understand the sweetness that male and female love brings to you, and you can't experience the kind of joy that two people have experienced in the process of establishing the most emotional, and the kind of heart and heart exchange that they have experienced to each other, so it will be more important than freedom relative to freedom, because looking at this so-called definition of freedom, although it looks chic on the surface, but in fact, behind the chic is a lot of helplessness and sadness. After all, you have not experienced the process of heart-to-heart exchange between people, especially between people of the opposite sex, and you do not have that feeling of sharing hardships and hardships, so even if you are given more freedom, you will not be able to experience the emotions in it.

So I personally think that love is relatively far more important than freedom, only if you have experienced unforgettable love, you will understand later, in fact, love is priceless, it will accompany you for a lifetime, but this feeling of freedom can not stay in your heart forever.

Love or freedom, which is more important?

Starting from the instinct of human behavior, food, cold, and freedom belong to the primary survival needs, without which the life process of this person will be difficult to continue. Pei Duofei's famous poem adds: Life is precious, but love is more valuable. If it is free, both can be thrown.

It can be seen from this that without food and cold, people lose the material basis for survival, but without freedom, people lose the basis of spiritual and behavioral freedom for survival, and once people lose the freedom of spirit and behavior, will they still have the freedom of love? "The skin does not exist, the hair will be attached", where does love begin? Therefore, freedom is the most basic condition and environmental requirement for being a human being, except for the basic survival prerequisites such as diet and cold protection.

First, "love is not determined by free will, but rather, love is the sinking of man's free will." "When you meet someone, maybe free will will tell you that he is not a qualified love object, and you will choose to break up with him, but free will can't kill your feeling of loving him, when you meet the person you love, even if reason tells you that you are not suitable, you will not have results, but you will still sink incorrigibly, in the face of the person you love, sensibility will eventually prevail over reason, let you go against your free will, and sink without hesitation, love is done knowing that you can't do it.

Second, "When describing what it's like to be in love, we're talking about falling in love, not jumping in love myself. "Falling in love with someone doesn't mean that I choose me to love him, but I can't do anything about who I fall in love with, I just fall in love with him, when you meet someone you really love, your original standards will be broken, the person you don't love, even if he meets all your standards, you can still find a reason not to love him, the person you love, even if he is not close to your standards, you are still helplessly in love with him, the standard is reserved for the person you don't love, so the two are compared, Weighing the pros and cons and so on is not love, love is a last resort.

Thirdly, "Love is a chess opponent, don't be afraid that the opponent will leave, because his departure is the only meaning you have to leave him." "I've seen a lot of analyses of this sentence on the Internet, but everyone who makes Huai must have their own understanding, this sentence is actually my favorite sentence in this debate competition, which is also consistent with the view held by the opposing side in this debate from beginning to end - you have superpowers, you can use it to make the person you love love you, so the love you get is too easy, so you won't cherish this kind of love. In fact, I don't really agree with this point of view, but there is undeniable truth to it, and this sentence is worth everyone's careful consideration.

Fourth, "It's not a big deal to fall in love, it's great to fall in love." This sentence is not too much to interpret, literally.

Fifth, "the love we praise is nothing but a noble lie, a lie that we need to sustain with all our lives." This sentence is also what I like more in this field, they also said earlier, "the background color of love is debt", "love itself is a kind of deprivation", yes, he fell in love with me, so I will have a filter in his heart, this filter makes him invisible to other people around him, even if there are excellent people around him, he turns a blind eye, he thinks I am the best, so love is a noble lie, because of love, he thinks I am the best, the best person, the background of love is debt, love itself is deprivation, because of love, he lost the opportunity to be with a better person, and I deprived him of this opportunity, so this kind of love is worth cherishing, but in reality, such love often ends unsatisfactorily.