Want a noble person who understands the law to give advice and give an idea?

Your question involves two inheritances, and it is two kinship systems, which is more cumbersome, and the information you can provide is relatively limited, so I will tell you a few key questions for the time being:

1. The house before the demolition is grandma's inheritance, your mother and uncle are the first-order heirs, and your uncle's other half-brothers are actually your grandma's stepchildren, theoretically they may have the right to inherit, the key depends on the family status of your grandma and grandpa when they got married, and whether they have fulfilled their obligation to support your grandma. For the sake of description, for the time being, they have no inheritance, then your mother and uncle each have a 50% share of the old house; Regardless of whose name it is registered, the nature of the share remains.

2. The demolition and resettlement of the old house is actually the disposal of their common property by your mother and uncle, no matter whose name is written on the real estate certificate, the new house is also shared by your mother and uncle, and it is still 50% of each from the perspective of inheritance, if you take into account the factor of additional contributions, your mother may still exceed 50%, and whose name is registered is two different things, but if there is a lawsuit, you have to provide evidence to prove this fact.

3. Your uncle's estate is limited to the deposits and other movable property in his name, and his share of the house, not the whole house. Therefore, even if other brothers want to inherit, they can only inherit for a part of the house, not all of it.

4. According to the relevant provisions of the Inheritance Law, your sister has more obligations to support her uncle during her lifetime, and she can appropriately divide the inheritance when dividing it. In the same way, it is up to you to find the evidence and submit it to the court.

The above is only a little analysis of the information you have provided so far, if you don't understand anything, you can continue to ask me, or QQ says: 1906109

You've said so much, it's a bit of a mess, I'll sort out a few key questions for you:

1. Whose name is on the property ownership certificate of the house to be demolished (the property right of the house is subject to the real estate certificate)? If it is your grandmother's name, there is no doubt that your uncle and your mother (if your grandmother only has two children) are one and a half, so the resettlement house for the demolished house should also be one and half for your uncle and your mother. If it's your mother and uncle's common name, that's fine, it's even more one.

But if it's your mother's name, then your uncle doesn't have a share, and if it's your uncle's name, then I'm sorry, you don't have a share.

2. After your uncle's death, your mother and his half-sisters are entitled to inherit his share, but they have not fulfilled their obligation to help, which can be grasped and the inheritance can be appropriately divided.

Is your grandmother your mom and your uncle's mom?

I'm sorry, because our grandma is my father's mother.

If so, then your mother and your uncle have half of the house, which means that your uncle only has 50% of the property. Your mother and those half-sisters (called Li here) are all brothers and sisters of your uncle, so they are both second-order heirs, regardless of the half-relationship here. So you can get 50% of your uncle's property, and then your mother supports your uncle, so you can divide more when you divide the inheritance.

So your mother has more than 75% ownership of the house, as for the amount of extra points, it depends on how the judge decides, and it is determined according to the financial situation of the heirs.

No, there is no blood relationship between you and your parents-in-law, and the legal relationship between you and your parents-in-law is dependent on your marital relationship, and this only remaining bond is broken after the death of your lover. Legally speaking, you are not obligated to support them, but you can take care of them appropriately if you are in a better financial situation. After all, they used to be relatives!

--- you have no statutory maintenance obligations.

-- Ethically speaking, there is also a dilemma. It is naturally good to carry out maintenance. But once you remarry, it's a little unfair to your new partner and their close relatives. Of course, everything depends on people's hearts and attitudes, and there are examples of being able to handle all aspects of the relationship well.

--In addition, Article 12 of the Inheritance Law stipulates that a widowed daughter-in-law who has fulfilled the main obligation of support to her father-in-law and mother-in-law, and a widowed son-in-law to her father-in-law and mother-in-law, shall be regarded as the heir in the first order. It can be seen that there is no obligation in the law, but such virtuous behavior is encouraged.

If your daughter-in-law has a share of the joint property of the husband and wife, you have to share it with your father-in-law and mother-in-law from a legal point of view, and from a moral point of view, I think you should support it for a certain period of time (this is purely moral), and you don't need to support it from a legal point of view.

Legally speaking, you are not obligated to support your parents-in-law, but your parents-in-law have the right to inherit your wife's estate.

Legally you have no obligation to alimony.

However, if a widowed daughter-in-law or widowed son-in-law has fulfilled the primary obligation of support to her in-laws, father-in-law, or mother-in-law, she may inherit the inheritance of her father-in-law and mother-in-law as a first-order heir.

Hello, legally you are not obliged to support your mother-in-law.

You can go to the place where the crime occurred (as this is the procedure) and then come back and file a civil lawsuit in court, providing physical evidence alleging that the bridal shop breached the contract, sued him for breach of contract to protect the customer's property, and caused damage to your property. as required by law; When the customer accepts the service of the store, the contract between the two is naturally generated, and the customer has the right to file a civil claim against the service store in case of any accident that causes damage to the customer during the service period, and if the two parties cannot negotiate, they can appeal to the court. I think that if the evidence is sufficient, if you are not satisfied, you can go to court and sue him.

In this case, because you have no evidence, it is best to accept the compensation conditions of the wedding photography shop, and if the other party does not admit it, you will not get a penny; As for the stolen 3,600 yuan, there is not much hope of being recovered, so pay more attention in the future.

Take wedding photos and come to Guangzhou celebrity wedding dresses.

Men reach the age of 22 and women reach the age of 20 and can get married.

You and your girlfriend can register your marriage and get a marriage certificate.

The "25 years old for men and 23 years old for women" is the legal age for late marriage, which is not compulsory, but only advocacy.

Your age is definitely ready to be registered, don't worry.

Hope it helps.

Are you and your girlfriend both working at home or outside the home? If you are working in other places, you can go to the local civil certification office to handle it. Many provinces don't have the same strict age requirements as yours.

The law has the highest effect.

No one can stop you.

The Big Brother Marriage Act stipulates.

Article 6: The age of marriage shall not be earlier than 22 years old for men and 20 years old for women. Late marriage and childbearing should be encouraged.

As long as there are any local regulations that contradict him, the regulations must be invalid, and marriage is a human right, as long as you reach the age of no one can deprive you of this right and sue him.

I sympathize with your sister's experience, if a woman marries the wrong man, this life will be ruined in the hands of a man, however, your sister's eight-year unfortunate marriage may not be easy on everyone's body, I heard that your sister is now in an entertainment venue, or persuade you to persuade your sister again, don't make mistakes again and again, and you don't necessarily have to choose to work in that place in order to live. I despise that place, your sister is unfortunate, and I sincerely wish her to find someone who truly loves her in the future and live happily ever after.

1.Your sister and your brother-in-law are married, but they have not obtained a license, which does not mean that they have lost legal protection, as long as someone testifies, the validity of this marriage will still be recognized by law.

2.Since they are a legal husband and wife, it is not legal for him (your brother-in-law) not to give the child living expenses, regardless of whether your sister and your brother-in-law live together in the future, he has the obligation to support the child until he reaches adulthood (18 years old).

3.Since we can't live together, let's leave, and half of the real estate should be right.

I wish your sister can get out of the predicament as soon as possible, and I hope you don't worry too much, your heart is good, as can be seen from here, I wish you all the best!

As long as the title deed is in your sister's name, it's easy to do.

It's easy to do! The house is your sister's name, isn't it your sister's house? If the man sues him for illegal possession if he doesn't give it, he will definitely be able to get it, and your sister's child is also the man's, although he has not received a marriage certificate, he can also ask for living expenses.

According to Chinese law, husband and wife can agree that the property acquired during the marriage relationship and the property before the marriage shall be owned separately or jointly or partly separately and partly jointly. The agreement shall be in writing. This means that the law emphasizes the nature of the agreement and the negotiation decision at the time of division, so if one party has transferred or concealed part of the property, it is difficult for the responsible person to identify this part of the property as the joint property of the husband and wife unless there is relevant evidence.

In this case, the key is the collection of evidence, which is recommended to be carried out under the guidance of a lawyer, in particular to identify the nature of the property that has been transferred, and to characterize it as custody rather than gift. There is also part of the property in the husband's name, which can be recognized as joint ownership of the husband and wife.

You are clear about your husband's income, is there any evidence to prove your husband's income, such as the unit's salary, bonuses, subsidies, etc., as long as you have these, you are not afraid, where he saves is his business, if you agree to divorce, you can write it clearly, if it is a lawsuit in court, you must also provide relevant information, so that the lawyer can give you ideas.

After marriage, the income of both spouses is the joint property of the husband and wife.

You know your husband's income, and you let your husband go where his income goes, so that his transfer of money will be exposed.

In the event of a divorce, you should include all of your husband's income in your joint property and then divide it.

The deposit of this card requires you to provide evidence that it is your property, and it cannot be determined if you do not provide evidence.

If you have any doubts, you can find a friend from the bank to privately transfer the entry and exit records for you, analyze the reasonableness and irrationality of the card to find out the flaws, no friends can not do.

If a lawsuit is involved, you can find a local lawyer as your ** person, and the lawyer will handle the collection of evidence.

You can't check your card information through legal channels right now.

The card issued by your husband's ID card is joint property, which is no problem, and it is easy to identify, the card opened with your father-in-law's ID card, you said that it is your common property, if it is transferred from his own card, and the bank has a record, you can ask the court to verify, the key is that you have evidence of your husband's income, which is very important, the income you don't know, your husband is stored on your father-in-law's card, it is difficult to say, if you have sued, you can apply for property preservation, if you have not reached the step of prosecution, it is really difficult to do.

The first point of the question you expressed, regarding the fact that your husband used your father-in-law's name to apply for a savings card, what you need to do is to find out whether your father-in-law has income, whether the card is deposited regularly and fixedly, whether the deposit is in one place, and whether the time of each deposit corresponds to the time when your partner receives his salary.

If your husband still wants to transfer his property at the time of divorce, you can take the property preservation first. Or if you now find that your husband has obviously transferred property to the detriment of your interests, you can also apply to the court to divide the joint property between you. But the reality is that his parents help him plan the whole thing, which is extremely bad for you.

So you'd better take audio recordings or other means to gather evidence. After all, the card he opened deposited more than 90,000 yuan into the joint property of your husband and wife, and it is difficult for you to provide evidence. So it's best to take the form of a recording, which must be clear and complete.

Do you want to talk about the marriage registration on 9/9/08?

You're talking about his family's privileged conditions, but how much of his personal wealth is there?

I'm afraid that there is not much compensation for this situation, as you said. First of all, the joint property of the husband and wife is limited to the property acquired by the husband and wife during the existence of the marital relationship. Secondly, only the joint property of the husband and wife is divided in the event of divorce.

I have deep sympathy for your situation, but according to the law, if you divorce him, you can really get very little financial compensation. But if you don't have a life now, he should give you a certain obligation to help in life, but that's also very little.

The best solution for you is to negotiate financial compensation with the other family.

You registered your marriage in '09? It's only 08 years this year. Dizzy.

It's a pity.

His parents' property has nothing to do with him. In the event of divorce, only the joint property of the husband and wife can be divided.

If you are divorced now and currently see the situation, you have no reason to ask him for compensation or compensation to you.

Marriage is a matter for both parties, and if you don't see this person before you get married, I'm afraid it's the cause of today's trouble.

I can only express regret for your situation. His family has nothing to do with you.

Secondly, you and he do not have joint property. But if the personal property he acquired during your marriage should be joint property, if not, you can only be blamed for looking away