Interviews and other notices are not fun.

"It's normal to wait for a notification after the interview." Although pointing out that you have some shortcomings, it does not lead to the conclusion that "there is no play". I've applied for a lot of companies, and I've gone through one round of interviews, two rounds of interviews, written exams, group discussions, etc., and every time it's "waiting for notice", which is normal, because recruiters can't hire you on the spot, they have to go back and compare and screen you one by one, and then notify you of the next round of interviews, and finally agree that you meet their requirements before notifying you to hire you.

It is a procedure and a practice.

One of the companies I interviewed for only notified me to take the written test two weeks later! For the first week or so, I was quite depressed and thought that I must be gone, although I feel good about myself. When I was called for an interview, I came to a conclusion:

Before you are sentenced to death, there is hope!

Having said all this, I want to tell you not to give up easily, think about the bright side of everything, wait patiently, maybe hope will come. Finally, a word of advice: if the result is not ideal, don't be discouraged, believe that you will definitely make a difference!

In different cases, you can't generalize!

No, if the interviewer says that you will be contacted after a few days, but you are not contacted, then there is a 90% probability that it will be no show.

Basically, the situation is no play, but it's not absolute, my current job may be too unattractive, and I was waiting for a notice after the interview, and then I took the initiative myself, and I asked ** at the appointed time, and then the company did not have a suitable candidate at that time.

Not necessarily, maybe they interviewed more people today, too late to call you**, if there is still no news tomorrow and the day after tomorrow, it is basically no play, if you feel that you may not be able to pass, it is recommended that you don't wait for this time, hurry up and find a few more other interviews to try it out, increase the chance of employment.

Don't worry, because there must be more than one person interviewing, so they have to have comprehensive quality, and then give a notice, which is normal within a week, but you also have to look at other companies, and it is best to go to another one, so that if you pass this, you will go, and if you don't pass, you will have a way back. Be informative of yourself!

Not necessarily, I think they see if there are people better than you.

A red heart, ready with both hands.

Let your friend ask the two of them out for dinner, and if you can't make an appointment, don't wait!

I'm more practical!

No. In fact, when the interviewer asks you to go home late, it represents the following four possibilities (note: being eliminated is one of the possibilities):

1. You are a spare tire.

The interviewer also wants to look at other candidates.

It is possible that your performance during the interview did not satisfy the interviewer, and the interviewer will have to go through a round of screening before making a decision. In other words, you're not doing very well, you have to be very good.

2. The company or the boss needs to be carefully considered.

If you are applying for a middle or senior management position.

Then the company will consider and select candidates more carefully, and it is unlikely to reply to you on the spot.

3. It takes time to schedule the next round of interviews.

The interviewer's initial interview is over, but there is something to do, and the second interview may not be arranged quickly because he is too busy with a business trip or a meeting.

4. Eliminated.

I didn't wait for a reply, just because the interviewer wasn't very happy with you, and you were eliminated.

I don't think it means that waiting for a notice after the interview doesn't mean it's no fun. Generally, there are the following situations:

The interviewer thinks you're not a good fit, but he wants to save some face for you and tell you tactfully, hoping you understand. As mentioned above, this is more likely.

The interviewer thinks you are very good, but the other interviewers are also good, and he can't choose for a while, and he needs to compare and make a decision. It's not uncommon to hire for senior positions, and if you arbitrarily think there's no hope, you could be missing out.

3. The interviewer has made an appointment with several people to interview for the same position, although he thinks you are not bad, but it has not reached the level where he wants to make a decision immediately, and he wants to see how the next few people are. It's similar to the situation above, he needs to compare and make a decision.

4. It is also possible that the interviewer's level is not high, and he has no right to make a decision, and he has no right to decide whether you go or stay. He needs to give your information to the boss for review, so that the leader can get an idea, and maybe you need to have a second interview.

Of course, this is a relatively high position that is so complicated.

If you're interviewing for a very good organization, don't give up easily. Don't arbitrarily assume that the interviewer is hopeless for you to wait for a notification. This is too arbitrary, and you may miss the opportunity.

There are two answers to whether there is hope for the notification after the interview, one is that the interviewer is considering all the interviewees and choosing from them. Waiting for the notice is the safest way, but it can also be said that it is not very satisfying to the HR face, and there is no decision on the spot.

Regardless of whether there is a drama or not after the interview, there is plenty of confidence and hope. Even if you are passed, don't be discouraged and use this interview as a test.

Think calmly and find out your shortcomings. Failure is the mother of success, from the ** fall, from the ** to get up. Good at learning from failures, the interview was hit, and it was confirmed that he had many shortcomings, as well as many flaws and imperfections.

Summarize the reasons for the failure of the interview, learn the lessons, and lay the foundation for the next interview.

The interview HR did not take a fancy on the spot. The good thing is to know your shortcomings, make targeted changes, and adjust your emotions in a timely manner.

As long as you are good at turning bad things into good things, and use the blow of the interview as a pressure motivator, you can re-prudently assess the situation, find out your own shortcomings, and know yourself and your opponent.

If you don't have a show, you have to.

If you are discouraged in the face of difficulties and setbacks, you will doubt life and have a negative attitude, which will only make you blindly consume enthusiasm, consume youth, and end up miserable.

There are always some ups and downs in life, and when you encounter failures and setbacks, you must not be discouraged, but think calmly, find out your shortcomings, mistakes and deficiencies, and improve them, so as to do your homework for the next interview.

It depends on the situation, many larger companies, he will notify you after the interview, have you passed? So don't be discouraged, basically wait for a week or so, if there is no notice, then it may be no fun.

After the interview, is it useless to wait for the notice? Waiting for the notice is not the same as saying that there is no play.

In fact, this is a very normal interview process. After all the interviews are over, ask the candidate to go back and wait for the notice.

The vast majority of legitimate companies do not tell candidates on the spot that they have been hired or not hired, and verbal offers have no legal effect.

We can analyze it, who generally asks candidates to go back and wait for notices? For a formal interview, the last round should be HR, so HR is most likely to mention asking the candidate to go back and wait for the notice, and a qualified HR will not tell the candidate on the spot that you have been hired or rejected. Why?

First of all, HR or HR who makes the final communication with the candidate is not necessarily the person who can make the decision, he can determine the needs of the candidate's background or salary, etc., but he needs to make the final communication with the employing department to determine whether to hire or not. And if HR tells the candidate on the spot that he has been hired, then if there is something abnormal that makes him unable to be hired, it will cause a lot of unnecessary trouble.

Secondly, some large companies generally have a very clear recruitment process, including the finalization of the position level, salary range, working hours, reporting objects, etc., which need to be reflected in the offer, and these confirmations take time, and it is impossible to tell the candidate yes or no in the interview.

Thirdly, large companies or high-level positions often need to do background checks, or need to apply for the HC and budget of the corresponding position, if HR promises that you will be hired, but the background check cannot be successful, it may cause labor disputes; Or in some multinational companies, there is no problem with the local management interview, but the application submitted to the headquarters may be frozen or rejected, and finally the offer cannot be offered.

Therefore, it is a normal reply to ask the candidate to go back and wait for the notification after the interview.

Of course, this is not to say that you will have to wait forever, there are some signals or methods that can give you further information.

Half and half of it. Post-interview notification is a process for companies to screen, and if you make a good impression on the interviewer during the interview, he will think of you.

One world, one interview. Almost all interviewers will say the phrase "wait for notice" at the end of the interview.

Many people think that waiting for notice = no notice means rejection.

Not really!!

Today we're going to talk about the topic of "waiting for notifications".

Maintain a corporate attitude.

As an interviewer, representing the image of the company, whether you like the job seeker or not, you need to show your professionalism and respect for the job seeker, and naturally you must be happy and angry.

The outcome of the interview is a sensitive topic, and the job seeker is eager to get the result, and it is easy for the job seeker to derive all kinds of speculation by saying something subjective.

After interviewing a candidate, it will take time to decide whether or not you can be admitted, and you can't make a decision right away, so the interviewer doesn't want your speech and performance to be over-interpreted. And "waiting for notice" is a safety card, which means that the initiative is in the hands of the enterprise: if you are admitted, we will notify you.

Compare other candidates.

It is impossible to interview you alone for a position, and there are usually at least several candidates of comparable quality.

Even if the interviewer is satisfied with your performance now, the company always wants to "choose the best of the best", maybe there will be someone who performs better and better meets the company's requirements in the future?

Everyone knows that when buying something, you need to shop around, and it is the same reason that companies choose job seekers.

The interviewer can't make a decision.

Sometimes it is not the interviewer who decides whether you can continue with the interview or admit you, so the interviewer cannot give you clear information.

The interviewer may have a good impression of you, but you still need to ask your supervisor for a comprehensive review.

There are two problems: waiting for the review time and the fact that the superior may not be satisfied with you.

Especially in large companies, it is possible to report for approval at all levels, and this process can be as short as a few days or as long as half a month.

Therefore, waiting for the notice is also in consideration, and it does take time to go through various processes, and it also needs to make a decision based on various factors.

Avoid the embarrassment of rejection.

It is true that some people encounter "waiting for notices", and the final result is rejection.

Maybe the interviewer has already known that you are not suitable through the interview, but at this time, can you clearly say: sorry you are not OK?

Saying it so straightforwardly not only sweeps the face of the job seeker, the scene is embarrassing, but also may make the job seeker complain about the interviewer or even the company, and it is not impossible for the situation of theoretical quarrels on the spot.

So use the method of asking you to go back and wait for the notice, and then not notify for a long time, you know in your heart that you are not up to the mark, so that the scene is good-looking.

If you ask for a notice after the interview, there is a high possibility that you will not be able to play, but it is not absolute, and some people will receive a notice and be hired.

I can't say the same, the competition is quite big now, there are many people, and people can't give a choice at once, it takes time, and in addition, you have to believe that you are the best.

I am in charge of human resources at the company, and I have interviewed many candidates, so I can ask this question responsibly. After the interview, waiting for the notice does not necessarily mean that there will be no play, it can only be said that there is a possibility that there will be no play. According to my experience and cognition, I think that the interviewer's request for notification is mainly due to the following three factors.

When I organize interviews, I pay attention to taking care of the feelings of the candidates and taking care of the candidates' face. Candidates who are not satisfied with themselves generally will not refuse in person, and try to avoid letting the candidates "take advantage of the excitement and return home". Waiting for the notice is to let the candidate have a process of psychological adaptation, so as not to make the candidate feel lost in person.

Whether the interview can be hired directly depends on the authorization given to the interviewer by the company and the boss. Under normal circumstances, when the company signs ordinary employees, the interviewer has the right to make decisions on the spot; And recruit middle-level cadres.

For the above positions, the interviewer may not have such a big right, and he needs to report to the boss for approval. This has to do with the position you are applying for and the authority of the interviewer.

If you are applying for a position above the middle level of the company, the interviewer does not have the authority to make decisions on the spot. If you wait for the notice, it is likely that the interviewer will report to the boss to decide. After receiving the approval from your boss, the interviewer will notify you of the offer.

This happens when there are more applicants and fewer positions. The interviewer's main consideration is to select the ideal employee among many candidates, because the number of candidates is large, it is difficult to make a decision for a while, and it takes multiple comparisons and research to make a trade-off. Just like "more monks and less porridge", grow up with a "picky" mentality.

This is a stopgap measure, not an outright repudiation.

In this case, to be honest, because there are more candidates for the company to choose from, the competition is fierce, and the success rate of being hired is not very high.

Which of the above three situations do you think is more in line with your actual situation?