How does the image quality compare to the Canon EF 24 105mm with a 70D camera compared to the Canon

1.The 24-105 has good sharpness in the center, fleshy edges, good color, constant F4 aperture, and an L-head red circle, which is more cost-effective at this price point. However, 70D is in APS-C format, with the equivalent coefficient that the 24-105 lens needs to be multiplied, the focal length becomes, the wide angle is missing, but the telephoto is earned.

2.15-85 is developed for APS-C format models, the equivalent focal length is 24-136, wide-angle and telephoto spacing, and the imaging quality is also good, but it is not red circle, limited to half-frame models, and is higher.

Conclusions:1If you are ready to upgrade to a full-frame model in the future, it is not recommended to enter the 15-852If you want to use the APS-C model all the time in the future, you can use the 15-85 if you have a budget

The camera grade is different. As far as APS-C is concerned, it is still a good point for 15-85, and it will be replaced with a full pair in the future, and generally speaking, 24-105 is not very recommended, simply put, it is a pity to make it tasteless and discarded. The same image as 15-85 with the same full head, high or low.

One wide angle, one stabilization.

24-105 is not recommended, no wide angle, 15-85 imaging is good, but if you change the full-frame body in the future, you can't use it, if you don't change the body in the short term, 15-85 is recommended

From the curve, the sharpness of the two is comparable, 24-105 in full frame, the outer circle is soft, but in the APS frame because the outer circle is not used, the sharpness is very good, so in the full frame, although it is a dog red circle, in the APS frame it is indeed a good head.

The difference between the two is that the focal lengths are very different, and the 24-105 has no wide angle at all at APS format. In addition, the maximum aperture of 24-105 full focal length is 4, which is better than 15-85.

If 7D is equipped with 24-105, the advantage is that the upgrade to full frame is available, and the disadvantage is that one head is not enough, and you may have to buy another 10-22 or 10-20 of the auxiliary factory.

I haven't used 15-85, only 24-105, which is still very good.

Let's talk about the answer first, the picture quality of the Canon 2470 is better than that of the Canon 24105. As for why, the specific answer is as follows:

1. The relationship between zoom factor, the larger the zoom factor, the worse the image quality will be.

1. The relationship between zoom factor, the larger the zoom factor, the worse the image quality will be.

This is basically like this, of course, there are exceptions, the main exception is the difference, a cheap small magnification zoom lens will naturally often be worse than an expensive large magnification zoom lens.

Many TV cameras or movie lenses, 10x zoom, one costs hundreds of thousands, can you say that the quality is not good?

For a camera's lens, basically, the higher the zoom factor, the worse the image quality.

Second, the relationship of **.

Second, the relationship of **.

Canon 2470 is a lot more expensive than 24105, right? You get what you pay for!

Generally speaking, people don't know how to read goods, how to know money.

Canon 24105, ** is only about half of 2470, right?

Canon 2470, this ** is very expensive.

Third, the relationship between aperture.

Third, the relationship between aperture.

The Canon 2470 is an aperture, whereas the 24105 is an aperture only.

If the aperture is one stop smaller, it will be cheaper.

And, in general, this kind of lens will have better image quality after stopping down half a stop or one stop of aperture, that is, the 2470 uses an aperture to have better image quality than the 24105.

What's more, when a lens like Canon 2470 is designed, it can also have a very good shooting effect with a wide open aperture!

And the effect of 24105 shooting at full aperture is definitely not comparable to that of 2470.

This was decided at the time of design.

This lens is a wide-angle lens, which is suitable for shooting landscapes.

The basic feature of a wide-angle lens is that the lens has a large angle of view and a wide field of view. The range of things that can be observed from a single viewpoint is much larger than what the human eye sees at the same viewpoint; The depth of field is long, showing a large range of sharpness; It can emphasize the perspective effect of the picture, show the foreground and express the sense of distance and proximity of the scene, which can enhance the appeal of the picture.

Therefore, wide-angle lenses are often used to shoot large areas of scenery, such as tall mountain scenes, wide buildings, large processions, and all indoor displays. The development is suitable, and the various levels of shadow tones expressed on the ** can be consistent with the light and shade of the original scene.

Shadow tone also refers to the tone of the whole picture, such as a certain ** is high (light) tone, low (dark) tone, or contrasting strong tone, or soft and flat tone, etc.

Full set 24-70 image quality is better than 24-105, the zoom factor is there, there is no shortage of money, the large aperture is definitely good, and the small spittoon is also okay from the perspective of saving money.

1. Take portraits, 24-70 that one is suitable. Forget about 24-70 f4, although the sharpness image quality is good, the aperture is still small.

2, 24-105 is suitable for tourist and general shooting, as well as SLR videography. Portraits can also be taken, which is a little worse than 24-70.

3. If it is a portrait with a scene, it is recommended to be 35, and if it is a pure portrait, it is recommended to recommend 85 or 85.

4. If there are many outdoor portraits, it is recommended to 70-200 white rabbits. Take a close-up, the whole body is very good.

The 5,50 focal length segment is relatively modest, and people can shoot it too. But 50 is too old to enter.

To put it simply: the pursuit of image quality to buy 24-70, the top standard zoom lens, there is no one. Reverse choice 24-105.

Let's talk about the disadvantages of 24-70 vs. 24-105 (the rest is all about the advantages): shorter focal length than 24-105 and heavy weight.

If it's 24-70 f4, it's better than 24-105. And there is also a macro function.

It can be used for daily life and travel, and it is suitable for all of them. It mainly depends on your pursuit of image quality and budget. FYI.

If you have money, go up to 24-105, otherwise it's 24-70

Don't bother. Very simple. 24-70 works better in this range than 24-70 in 24-105. In addition, compare the aperture, are they all 4. The wide angle also looks at the aperture.

**Factors have to be considered, I believe that the higher the price, the better the lens.

Don't talk nonsense on the second floor, 24-105 is also full-width.

It should be said that the gap in imaging is not as good as the difference in price.

In terms of convenience, 24-105 is better. The 5d2 high sense is also quite strong, not worse than that aperture.

Personally, I don't think there's a need to change it.

There must be a difference, but I can't tell how big it is. It's hard for others to say: maybe there are those who say that the difference is too great; Maybe ordinary people can't see any special difference.

You can't figure it out yourself, you can use it for the old, and it's better to have more than less.

There is a big difference between 24-70 and 24-105.

24-70 is, after all, a full-frame shot. 24-105 is incomparable.

24-70 is not about quality. Feel. Phase formation and high light sensitivity. 24-105 are unsurpassable.

As for whether to change or not, it all depends on what the focal length you are used to use.

If you have a spare amount of money, it's better to change it.

Change it, if you don't change it, you won't feel comfortable. You now have this idea, indicating that the horizontal economy can also be.

The first stop of aperture is not a matter of light sensitivity, but of the degree of freedom of shooting. Aperture is important.

24-70 imaging is a little better, but since you have 24-105, there is no need to change it.

If you have to change, wait for the second generation of 24-70.

How about the shooting light? Generally, there is no need to change it.

Advantages: **Focal end 24 136, wide range of application, suitable for hang-up. With the mid-range machine, the focus is quiet, fast and stable.

The stabilization effect increases the production rate. Sharpness is high at full aperture, excellent in one stop, and even better edge imaging at over 17 40. The workmanship is exquisite, the weight is full, and the texture is good.

Disadvantages: The 50 85 end is not ideal, and the quality of the relative wide-angle end decreases greatly. The maximum aperture vignetting angle at the full focal end cannot correct the amount of light around the machine. Barrel deformation with more than 3 at the wide-angle end. There are no red circles, and it is waterproof and dustproof.

Summary: This lens is very practical to use with hang-up, but there are really a lot of small problems. Fortunately, the imaging quality is still satisfactory, and the structural workmanship is quite good.

Canon really doesn't have a better half-frame commonly used zoom head than it, and the compatibility of the sub-factory is greatly reduced, so the 15 85 is the best choice. The score is my evaluation of it, rounded up to 5 points!