How does the lack of salience of research results contribute to the field?

Key Learning Points 1 Understand how to write a review 2 Learn to write a review Writing guidance A review is the meaning of a comprehensive narrative, that is, to synthesize the various parts and attributes of the object or material that has been analyzed into a unified whole, and then narrate it. It requires strong abstraction, generalization, and categorization skills. From the perspective of writing, a review is also a common form of writing that comprehensively organizes many materials, and is often used for character introduction, meeting minutes, situation reflection and activity reporting.

When collecting, pay attention to the breadth, depth and accuracy of the data. Then, the available materials are arranged and analyzed, and the priority is distinguished. Second, arrange the structure.

It is necessary to arrange the materials in a certain order, and pay attention to the scientific classification of materials and the orderliness of arranging materials. Third, the language should be appropriate. The purpose of the review is to make the facts and circumstances clear, so the language should be concise, general, and plain, and long descriptive language is not necessary.

From the perspective of news style, a summary is a kind of commentary news, which is a news report that comprehensively reviews a number of news facts. Common ones include comprehensive news (also known as news roundups), dynamic feeds, current affairs roundups, and reader letter roundups. This is illustrated by a synthesis of news and a summary of letters from readers.

Comprehensive news is a news report that reflects the overall situation of a period, a certain activity, or a certain event. There are two common types of synthesis: horizontal synthesis of a common aspect of many reporting objects; A longitudinal synthesis of the development process of a certain aspect of the subject of a report.

There is also a combination of horizontal and vertical to write. When writing, the foothold should be high, and through the induction and synthesis of a large number of materials, the point of view should be extracted, and attention should be paid to highlighting the characteristics to prevent exhaustion. In the following comprehensive news, the author noticed the combination of general summary and typical examples, which reflects the fruitful achievements of the development of the film industry in the new era from one side.

This paper expounds the purpose and function of a literature review, and provides readers with a concept, framework, and steps on how to write a good literature review. This paper points out the common mistakes made in writing a literature review, and introduces the four basic steps of a literature review: overview (classification), summary, criticism, and recommendations.

Literature review occupies an important place in the writing of master's and doctoral students, and is an important chapter in the literature. The quality of a literature review is directly related to the success of the review. Literature review is the abbreviation of comprehensive literature review, which refers to the systematic and comprehensive description and comment on the research results, existing problems and new development trends of the research problems (disciplines, topics) that have been achieved in a certain period of time on the basis of comprehensive collection and reading of a large number of relevant research literature.

Overall"i.e. collection"100 schools"words, comprehensive analysis and collation; "Description"That is, the author's point of view and practical experience on the literature

In terms of research results, it is not that the more significant the results of your research, the greater the contribution to the related field. Often study ordinary items. It is also possible to contribute.

The research results lack significance, how to contribute to related fields, if the breast is found, you can increase some investment in some areas where the effect is more obvious, and invest some efforts.

In fact, if I contribute to my related field, I can compare the results of research with the results of my research.

It refers to the creative results obtained by a scientific researcher through a series of mental and physical work such as experimental observation, investigation and research, comprehensive analysis, etc., within the scope of a scientific and technological research project or subject research that he is engaged in, and confirmed to have academic significance and practical value after evaluation or appraisal.

The results of the study lack the contribution of plasticity as a relevant region. This contribution is not the same.

I think it's too difficult for the research results to show how to contribute to the field, and we don't know much about this.

The research results lack significance, and how to make contributions to the relative field must be checked on the Internet.

How does the lack of salience of research results contribute to the field? The results of the research should clearly show that his work has won good praise.

The research results lack significance, and how to contribute to the field should be written in a practical way.

Philosophy of science and technology is an important sub-discipline of philosophy, which mainly studies the general laws of nature, the basic methods of scientific and technological activities, the philosophical problems in science and technology and its development, and the interaction between science and technology and society.

Philosophy is all liberal arts.

I may transfer to the philosophy of science and technology, but if I do, I really don't know what I will learn. If you go, you will know the specialty. The basic needs of China are to learn some genera.

Dialectics of nature and the like.

Confused, can someone talk about it, for example, if you are a graduate student in this subject, what will your graduate life be like? Like other graduate students, I still look at myself.

What will the content of the class be like for scientific research? Certainly related to the philosophy of science and technology.

What are the job prospects for the future? This is a research category, not an application. If you are employed, you will need to have other professional skills.

This major should belong to the liberal arts category.

First of all, we need to understand that all those who study philosophy basically can't find a job, and basically they can't study philosophy well, although this statement is a bit extreme!!

Therefore, it is not very good for those who study philosophy to find a job.

Secondly, philosophy is also pure theory, as well as application.

The philosophy of science and technology is already application-oriented, that is, [explaining] science and technology, and applying science and technology.

Q]: Is it a liberal arts or a science major?

A]: Definitely liberal arts.

The philosophy of science and technology mainly studies the general laws of nature, the basic methods of scientific and technological activities, the philosophical issues in the development of science and technology, and the interaction between science and technology and society. Since science and technology activities have become independent social activities, the investigation and study of science and technology as a separate object plays an important role in both the development of science and technology and the development of society. The study of philosophy of science actually involves many disciplines such as Marxist philosophy, history of science and technology, natural philosophy, philosophy of science, philosophy of technology, science of thinking, sociology of science and technology, methodology of science and technology, ethics of science and technology, and economics of technology.

If you are a bachelor's degree in philosophy of science and technology, it is recommended that you go to graduate school, of course, it is best to study for a doctorate, and it is basically difficult to get an undergraduate job. If you are already a graduate student, I summarized the two major employment directions: one is the profession of college teachers, counselors and other colleges and universities, but now the sad thing is that many colleges and universities have seriously overloaded the philosophy majors, and the general colleges and universities have already started with doctors.

The second is to take the civil service exam, which is quite a lot of philosophy majors. Because philosophy is widely regarded as secretarial, it is recommended to insist on taking the exam for one year, and the way of civil servants, as long as you take more exams, still has a great chance.

In addition, I personally feel that philosophy is learned by aristocrats, if you don't value material, worry-free food and clothing, and like philosophy, it is recommended that you take the doctorate! It's good to do academics.

One is to do research, go to some research institutes, or universities, and you can do some liberal arts work, if you are capable enough, you don't care about your major, you have a brain, you can do anything great.

Hehe. To read this employment, you must be an elite to have a future, such as giving lectures at universities and publishing books. If your IQ is not above 120, then there is basically only one way Tufuzi.

It is not recommended to read, the ranking of employment prospects is definitely low in the philosophy category, it used to be a little better than that of Chinese philosophy, but now it is far inferior.

To be employed, read Ma Zhe.

Very good, now the graduate students of science and philosophy are open public courses, colleges and universities are very short of science and philosophy teachers, but they have to be doctors, and they are doctors from famous universities If they are only masters of science and philosophy, it is the same as not studying in graduate school, and it is difficult to find employment

It's a hit, it's better than the others.

You also believe it. I graduated in philosophy for 4 years and stayed at home for 4 years. I don't even have the right person to find a job. Not to mention that people can tell me that they don't want you. There is no chance to submit files.

Both are summaries of the thinking of human daily life, and science and technology are unique and objective; Philosophy, on the other hand, is not unique, it can have multiple points of view, and it is more subjective.