What is the difference between Emperor Xiaowen s reform and Shang Ying s reform?

The 1st floor is OK, but the reform of Emperor Xiaowen should be considered a success, the reform of Emperor Xiaowen is mainly the reform of Sinicization, which realizes the integration of the Hu and Han nationalities, and lays the foundation for the arrival of the unification of the Sui and Tang dynasties. There are other deep socio-historical reasons for its short life, and it is not entirely a matter of reform.

Shang martingale changed the law andReform of Emperor Xiaowen of the Northern Wei DynastyThe joint effect is: to promote the historical process of feudalization.

The Shang Dynasty reformed the law and promoted the Qin state.

The feudalization process, the reform of Emperor Xiaowen of the Northern Wei Dynasty accelerated the ethnic minorities in the north.

feudalization process. The similarities are the establishment of household registration, the encouragement of agricultural development, the encouragement of production, the reform of the old system, the implementation of the new system, and the change of customs.

The "recognition of private ownership of land" by the Shang Dynasty and the "Sinicization Policy" reformed by Emperor Xiaowen both accelerated the process of feudalization.

important role.

The Shang Dynasty reform conformed to the trend of feudal historical development, and pushed Huai to drive the lead banquet and Lu slave society to feudalism.

Social transformation, in line with the interests of the emerging landlord class, greatly promoted social progress and historical development. Through reforms, the Qin state abolished the old system and created a new system adapted to social and economic development.

The reforms promoted the social progress of the Qin State and promoted the development of the economy. At the same time, it has strengthened the national strength and realized the prosperity of the country and the strengthening of the army. It laid the foundation for the unification of the whole country in the future and played an important role in the development of Chinese history.

The combined effect of the Shang Dynasty Reform and the reform of Emperor Xiaowen of the Northern Wei Dynasty was to promote social and economic development.

The Shang Ying reform refers to the reform of the law implemented by the defender Shang Ying in the Qin State.

During the Warring States Period, after Qin Xiaogong Yingquliang of Qin State ascended the throne, he was determined to strengthen reform, so he ordered to recruit talents, and Shang Ying entered Qin from Wei State, and put forward a set of development strategies such as abandoning well fields, emphasizing agriculture and mulberry, awarding military merits, implementing unified measurements and establishing a county system, which won the trust of Qin Xiaogong.

Ren Shang Ying was the chief of the left house, and in 356 BC and 350 BC, he implemented it twice"Waste well fields, open Qianmo, and actually search for the sail line county system, reward cultivation and weaving and fighting, and implement the hail law of the world"It is a variation of the main content.

After the Shang Dynasty reform, Qin's economy developed, the combat effectiveness of the army was continuously strengthened, and it developed into the richest and most powerful centralized state in the late Warring States period.

Similarities and differences:

1.The purpose was different: the original intention of the Wei Shang Dynasty reform was to implement a new agricultural system to improve the gap between the rich and the poor, and the original intention of the Xiaowen Emperor's reform was to strengthen the rule of the imperial court.

2.The scope of reform was different: the Wei Shang Dynasty reform focused on the implementation of a new agricultural system, while the reform of Emperor Xiaowen paid more attention to political institutions, social construction, and cultural development in addition to the new agricultural system.

3.The way is different: Wei Shang Ying's reform suddenly announced that the implementation of the reform was only in a certain area, and it was gradually promoted. The reform of Emperor Xiaowen was to announce legislation and promote the reform throughout the country.

Rating:

The Wei Shang Dynasty had an important impact on the history of the time and later, improving the gap between the rich and the poor; The reforms of Emperor Xiaowen were more long-term and effective, improving the social structure, promoting the development of China's economy and culture, and bringing about a long-term stable political state, so both reforms are of great historical significance.

The background is in an era of separatist regimes and social unrest; All of them are faced with the task of strengthening their national strength and defeating foreign enemies;

With the strong support of the monarch or emperor.

All were feudal reforms.

All of them have conformed to the trend of historical development, adapted to social and economic development, and greatly accelerated the pace of national integration.

Both promoted the feudalization of the regime and created conditions for national unity.

All of them have encountered opposition and obstruction from the old forces.

Both have won the group's greatest support and worked together to achieve success. From the point of view of social structure, they all belong to the aristocracy and the vast majority of low-level people.

In terms of economic structure, they all belong to the type of improving the relations of production. In fact, from the attitude of the bottom group, we can see whether the direction of reform is in line with the overall needs of social development at that time. As long as the needs are satisfied, the intrinsic needs of the relations of production are satisfied.

It all worked.

The emphasis is different: the Shang Dynasty reform method focuses on enriching the country and strengthening the army; The focus of Emperor Xiaowen's reform was to update the system and move the capital to customs.

The purpose was different: the Shang Dynasty reform was to achieve a strong army, a rich country, in order to gain a dominant position in the annexation war; Emperor Xiaowen's reform was to alleviate social contradictions and change the backward state of the Xianbei people.

The timing is different: the Shang Dynasty was implemented in 356 BC and 350 BC; Emperor Xiaowen of the Northern Wei Dynasty changed the law in 471 A.D. (the fifth year of Huang Xing).

The impact was different: after the Shang Dynasty changed the law, the old system of the Qin State was completely abolished, and the economy developed. The state of Qin gradually became the most powerful of the Seven Heroes of the Warring States, laying a solid foundation for the unification of the world in Later Qin.

However, the reform of Emperor Xiaowen of the Northern Wei Dynasty was conducive to alleviating class contradictions and played a positive role in the recovery and development of the social economy Sun Zheng. However, it quickly fell apart and fell into extinction just over 30 years after the death of Emperor Xiaowen.

The direction is different: the Shang Dynasty reform is bottom-up, and the Xiaowen Emperor's reform is top-down.

Comments on the two reforms:

Reform will inevitably be obstructed by the old forces, and it will not be smooth sailing, and we must give full consideration to the complexity and arduousness of reform.

The key to the success or failure of reform lies in whether its positive results can be preserved and maintained, and not on the personal fate of the reformers.

Reform measures should be aimed at the actual situation and effective, and in the process of carrying out reforms, it is necessary to employ people appropriately.

Reformers need to have foresight and firm political courage.

The similarity is that all of them have complied with the trend of the times, and they have all been hindered by the old forces, and they have all succeeded; The difference is that the two have different emphasis, Shang Ying focused on the rich army and the country, and Emperor Xiaowen focused on the reform of the system. The key to the success or failure of reform lies in whether its positive results can be preserved and maintained, and not by the fate of the reformers themselves. Reform measures should be aimed at the actual situation and effective, and personnel should be appropriately employed in the process of carrying out reform.

The same point of reform is to conform to the trend of historical development, to promote the feudalization of the regime, to consolidate the power is to enter the local development, the difference is that the Shang Dynasty changed the law to enrich the country and strengthen the army, these two changes are very important for the development of China's judgment and society.

The Shang Dynasty reform focused on enriching the country and strengthening the army; The reform of Emperor Xiaowen focused on the renewal of the system, the relocation of the capital and the change of customs. All of them have conformed to the trend of historical development, adapted to social and economic development, and greatly accelerated the pace of national integration. The Shang Dynasty changed the law in order to achieve a rich country and a strong army, so as to gain a dominant position in the annexation war; The reform of Emperor Xiaowen of the Northern Wei Dynasty was to alleviate social contradictions and change the backward state of the Xianbei people.

The emphasis is different: the Shang Dynasty reform focuses on Liang Zi's enrichment of the country and the strengthening of the army. Emperor Xiaowen's reform focused on the renewal of the system of purity, the relocation of the capital, and the change of customs. The Shang Dynasty's method of changing the law was relatively drastic, but Emperor Xiaowen's entire measure was to be gentle and slow.

1. Different: the focus is different: the Shang Dynasty reform focuses on enriching the country and strengthening the army; The reform of Emperor Xiaowen focused on the renewal of the system, the relocation of the capital, and the change of customs.

The purpose was different: the Shang Dynasty reform was to achieve a rich country and a strong army to gain a dominant position in the annexation war; Emperor Xiaowen's reform was to alleviate social contradictions and change the backward state of the Xianbei people.

2. Same: all conform to the trend of lead and plum spikes disturbed by historical development.

All of them promoted the feudalization of the regime and created conditions for the unification of the country.

All of them have encountered opposition and obstacles from the old forces.

The results were all successful.

3. Shang Ying's reform: After Qin Xiaogong of Qin State ascended the throne during the Warring States Period, he was determined to strengthen the reform, so he ordered the recruitment of talents. Shang Ying entered Qin from the Wei State, and put forward a set of development strategies such as scrapping well fields, emphasizing agriculture and mulberry, awarding military merits, implementing unified measurements and establishing a county system, etc., which won the trust of Qin Xiaogong, and appointed him as the head of the left, in 356 BC and 350 BC, he successively implemented two changes with the main content of "abandoning well fields, opening up Qianmo, implementing the county system, rewarding cultivation and weaving and war Huai Budou, and implementing the law of joint sitting".

After the Shang Dynasty reform, Qin's economy developed, and the combat effectiveness of the army was continuously strengthened, and it developed into the richest and most powerful feudal state in the late Warring States period.

4. The reform of Emperor Xiaowen of the Northern Wei Dynasty, commonly known as the sinicization of filial piety, refers to the political reforms implemented during the reign of Emperor Xiaowen of the Northern Wei Dynasty during the Northern and Southern Dynasties. Its main content is the Sinicization Movement, including the implementation of the Juntian system and household regulation, the reform of the official system and legal decrees, the relocation of the capital to Luoyang, and the change of Han customs. The Sinicization reform measures implemented by Emperor Xiaowen were conducive to alleviating class contradictions and played a positive role in the recovery and development of the social economy.

1) The same point is the feast shooting:

all conform to the trend of historical development;

All of them promoted the feudalization of the regime and created conditions for the unification of the country.

All of them have encountered opposition and obstacles from the old forces.

The results were all successful.

2) Differences:

The focus is not the same: the Shang Dynasty reform focuses on enriching the country and strengthening the army; The reform of Emperor Xiaowen focused on the renewal of the system, the relocation of the capital, and the change of customs.

The purpose is different: the Shang Dynasty Xiang Shu changed the law in order to achieve a rich country and a strong army to gain a dominant position in the annexation war; Emperor Xiaowen's reform was to alleviate social contradictions and change the backward state of the Xianbei people.