Panasonic LX3 Nikon P300 camera which kind is better?

LX3 of course is good, Leica's lens, the imaging is quite good, many news reporters generally not only have a SLR camera, but also generally have to buy a Leica or LX series camera as a secondary machine, because it is much more portable than a SLR camera, and the imaging is close to a SLR. Not only does the LX3 have excellent imaging, but it also has a very complete range of manual functions.

P300The cost performance does not feel very high, the same brand or other brands such as Canon have many machines that are more cost-effective than this camera, if you look at it purely from the LX3 and P300, the cost performance is still LX3 is higher.

Panasonic's LX3 and Canon's G11 and G12 are all quasi-professional-grade cameras, and many photography enthusiasts will choose LX3, G11 or G12 to sweep the streets in addition to bringing their own SLR when they go out to shoot. The LX3 is really great at shooting landscapes.

I'm selling cameras, from the point of view of the heat of attention, the P300 is higher, after all, is it a new model, but the CMOS sensor of the P300 and the CCD sensor of the LX3 are incomparable, what zoom, the pixels are all floating clouds, don't care about him, the sensitive components, the lens, the aperture is the most important thing, the first two Panasonic has an advantage, the absolute advantage The aperture Nikon is a little bigger, but the difference with will not affect you.

If you can fancy these two machines, you must be a player, or someone to point out.

With so many people recommending the LX3, there are definitely benefits to it.

Summary. Hello dear, glad for your question. The Panasonic LX3 is the most talked-about portable digital camera this summer, with its 24mm wide-angle and extra-large aperture lens being the focus of attention.

The Nikon S3300 digital camera is also very good, and the current market for this digital camera** is about 1000 yuan. As a lightweight digital camera, although it is positioned at the level of entry, its performance configuration is still very impressive.

Hello, I have seen your question and am sorting out the answer, please wait a while

Hello dear, glad for your question. The Panasonic LX3 is the most talked-about portable digital camera this summer, with its 24mm wide-angle and extra-large aperture lens being the focus of attention. The Nikon S3300 digital camera is also very good, and the current market for this digital camera is about 1000 yuan.

As a lightweight digital camera, although it is positioned at the level of entry, its performance configuration is still impressive.

I want to buy a second-hand CCD landscape and portrait shooting, I hope you can recommend one, the budget is about 400.

Okay dear, please wait

Hello, I recommend Panasonic FX150, Kodak C813, oh dear

Life is not easy, and the evaluation of my relatives is very important to me <>

If this answer is helpful to you, you can end the consultation and ask you to click on the five small stars <>

Love sail closed to you] thank you very much

I'm not a prawn, but I've been using the N family's entry-level SLR for a year, and I've learned a little bit of fur. SLR is a professional or photography enthusiast to eat guys, but because the SLR is too bulky to carry, they will also bring some high-end professional-grade card players, Nikon's P series, Canon's G series, Panasonic's LX series are all positioned at this level. How to say it!

1 If you take Nikon's entry-level SLR (e.g. D3100, D5100** at 3900 to 4600) and P300, P7100 than the image quality. Then the former will be much better, because even if it is an entry-level SLR, his sensor (CCD or COMS) will be larger than the card machine.

It's a big cut, and in addition to the large "size" of the SLR, its overall structure is more stable and more conducive to photography, so there is a gap in image quality. However, the SLR is not suitable for carrying, so you have to bring your own bag.

2. If you compare Nikon P300 and P7000, they are both high-end P series positioning, and the two are compared.

P7000: The sensor is slightly larger, the optical zoom is doubled, the professionalism is a little stronger, the size is slightly larger, it is Nikon's flagship card machine with the highest positioning P300: optical zoom magnification, the appearance and size are not very wrong, and it is also a professional-grade positioning.

Personal opinion: Pixels above 10 million are enough, no matter how big the pixel is, the significance is very small, and the pixel size is affected by the publicity of those manufacturers, and it is the performance of the layman. The P7000 is slightly better than the image quality, but the difference is very small.

The P300 and P7000 are very good, and you can choose according to the price, appearance, portability and other factors that you value.

The photographic effect is very good, although it is not comparable with SLR and single electricity, but the ** of 2000 is cost-effective. The large aperture is the highlight, and the night scene is passable, but the aperture at the telephoto end, ** the bokeh background is not as powerful as advertised. The screen of the display size, 920,000 colors, is better to look at photos on the camera.

It's small, but it's weighty and feels good.

Anyway, I'm also struggling, I want to buy P300, I don't know anything about the camera...

You go to the Zhongguancun P300 forum to see,Nikon picture quality is really not good,Especially blue,The forum is also very cold!

This is Nikon's flagship card model, and its main feature is that it has full manual functions (such as aperture priority, shutter priority, etc.), which is most suitable for those who want to learn photography but don't want to use a DSLR. The back-illuminated CMOS sensor provides excellent imaging performance even in low light (high ISO). The whole machine has a high configuration and high image quality, but it is also high.

The manual is rich in features (such as aperture priority, shutter priority), small and portable, and more importantly, the Nikon brand is professional and reliable, which is worth recommending! It's just a bit high!

I'm also hesitating.,But P300The imaging effect is quite not very good.,Yes,In the case of aperture priority, it can only be reached,Compared with LX5,It seems that the focal length is longer,But LX5 is a little expensive,But it looks a lot better.,Look at it in the forum on the Internet,P300's is particularly deserted,LX5's is quite lively.,Hey,Tangled。 Now he is also hesitating, planning to wait and see for a while.

First of all, the LX5 is a high-end consumer camera, with a sensor size of only 1 inch and an area of only a dozen times the size of a truncated SLR, so it is impossible to capture the effect of bokeh. For night scenes, theoretically how good a camera is also the need for a tripod, the advantage of SLR for cards in night scenes is that the available value of ISO will be much higher, such as D3100 3200 This primary SLR is no problem to use ISO1600 when the light is low, and the image quality of ISO3200 is also acceptable under special circumstances. But the ISO800 of a machine like the LX5 will be the limit, so the DSLR can increase your success rate in low-light conditions.

Secondly, what you said is more than 1000 more expensive than LX5, just a set of D3100 or 3200**, you must know that the 18-55 lens only has about 3 times the zoom ability, whether it is playing photography or traveling, the restrictions will be very large. So, once you get into the SLR, you will more or less invest again in the future, and you have to think about this point clearly. In fact, I recommend you to buy the D3200 18-105 set directly, although it is about 1000 more expensive, but if you are just playing, you can ensure that a lens is enough under most conditions to avoid secondary investment.

As for the 18-70, it is a very old lens from Nikon, with an image quality of 18-55 and a grade of 18-55, which should only be bought second-hand at the moment, and it is not recommended for novices. Nikon 16-85VR is an upgraded version of 18-70, the market price of the new head is 4000-4500, the second-hand is about 3000, the imaging quality and focal length coverage are ideal, the workmanship has obvious advantages over the previous heads, but the cost performance is not comparable to the 18-105, you have to weigh this yourself.

The biggest advantage of D3200 compared with D3100 is that the pixels are significantly improved, the picture details will be retained more, and the image processor has been upgraded to a certain extent. Other places, such as the focus metering system, the focus system control, etc., are basically the same, **The difference is about 300 yuan.

With Panasonic LX5, buy SLR investment a lot of money, not including flash, camera bag, LX5 has a selection of pictures by scenery and portraits and go to travel conveniently.

The Panasonic LX3 was considered a high-end digital camera at the time, with a 1-inch sensor, but it was only a slightly higher consumer digital camera-level machine;

Compared with the SLR, the sensor is much smaller, and the image quality is definitely incomparable;

The Nikon D5300 is a DSLR camera with an APS-C format sensor.

It's not a grade camera at all, it's hard to compare, and the LX3's only advantage is its small size.

Attached is a sensor area size ratio chart, the larger the area of the sensor, the better the image quality.

The Nikon P300 features an F-lens that condenses many of Nikon's optical technologies, resulting in a lightweight digital camera's high-speed lens. High refractive index lens for smaller bodies. With high-refractive index lenses with a refractive index of up to or higher, a single lens can compensate for image field curvature and spherical aberrations, resulting in thinner and thinner bodies and sharper, high-contrast images.

Wide-angle zoom lens with built-in lens shift damping.

LX3 is a 1-inch photosensor, positioned as a high-end card machine, and its comprehensive quality is definitely stronger than that of the IXUS 300.

However, the focal length of the LX3 is 24-60mm, while the focal length of formal portrait photos is 80-135mm.

However, with a few tricks, the LX3 can also take good quality portraits:

1. When using the wide-angle end to shoot portraits, the character should be placed close to the first position when composing the picture (of course, the effect may not be good when placed in the front), so that it is less affected by the distortion of the lens barrel;

2. When shooting portraits with 60mm, move a little farther away before shooting. For example, if you want to take a half-length photo, then take 3 or 4 body photos, and then crop ** in the later stage. This avoids the effects of lens perspective distortion.

Generally, the household flushes 5 inches or 7 inches**, and the room for 10 million pixels to crop is still relatively large.

3. When metering, due to the problem of perspective distortion, framing at the 60mm end, the proportion of the character in the whole picture may be reduced, and the key metering commonly used when shooting portraits may be more affected by the ambient light, resulting in **inaccuracy, at this time, spot metering can be used to metering the ** of the subject at close range. Because the reflectivity of the yellow race is close to that of 18% of the medium gray, the metering can obtain the data more accurately, so the skin tone can be more accurately restored. In fact, many photographers also often use ** metering instead of using gray card metering.

In addition, many home users shoot "portraits"**, most of them are "here for a visit" type of tourism**, rather than formal "portrait photos", and this kind of ** itself will not make the portrait fill the whole picture, and the focal length of the LX5 is also completely suitable.