Tangled in the Canon S90 vs Panasonic ZS7, which one is better to improve

Updated on number 2024-05-21
2 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    ZS7 or don't compare with S90, it's not a level. The Panasonic machine that can be compared to the S90 is the LX3, and as for the ZS7, let's take a break with its 1 small CCD.

    The S90's zoom covers 28 105, the most commonly used focal length, which is sufficient in most cases. On the contrary, the ZS7's zoom of more than 10x is achieved at the expense of image quality. Do you really need a telephoto?

    Are you really willing to give up image quality most of the time for the occasional telephoto demand? Let's think about it for yourself. Panasonic's generation of classic models LX3, the focal length is 24 60, the zoom is only, smaller, but no one dares to say that the LX3 is worse.

    In short, S90 is obviously a grade higher than ZS7,1 Large CCD,Large aperture,None of them can be compared with ZS7,S90It is used by many people to make SLR standby。 If you want image quality, control, and night shooting ability, the S90 wins. If you're going to buy a Panasonic machine of the same class, you should go to the LX3 instead of the SZ7.

    In addition, I don't agree with what I said upstairs, but it's actually very big. Unless it's very well lit outdoors, you can get your ISO down two stops in most other environments, reducing noise a lot and improving image quality. This is especially evident when shooting indoors, even if the lights are on indoors at night, the average camera will have to adjust the ISO to 400 or even above 640 to get enough shutter speed (otherwise the image will be blurred), but the ISO of the small CCD of 1 is turned on to 400 and the noise is a lot, in which case the advantage of the S90 is very obvious.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    Hello: First of all, let's take a look at 310hs

    And ZS7, these two, it can be said that there is no comparison, the use is different, because ZS7 is a telephoto machine, used to record emergencies, capture, is a friend who loves to collect news. For example, if you want to shoot the police on the side of the road, you can stand far away and shoot as much as you want, but if you use 310, you have to run to the police uncle to shoot, and the result is that you will be scolded.

    And the 310 machine, it is also good, the biggest highlight is that the aperture is large enough, and it is fully manual, so it is suitable for artistic creation, and the effect of shooting scenery is good, and Canon's latest HS is applied

    System,Imaging is still strong in places with bad light,Shooting people,Night scenes are better than ZS7,This conclusion is not my personal feeling,But the configuration is in**pendulum。 Hehe. Which one you choose depends on what you like to do with it.

    Of course, if it were me, I still wouldn't choose the 310, I would choose the 300, which is cheaper than him, and the 300 is exactly the same as the 310 in terms of imaging, ccd, aperture, hs

    It's exactly the same, so is the processor, the most obvious difference is that the 310 is more fashionable, it's a touch screen machine, which is the most annoying thing for professional players, slow to use, always press the wrong button, and it doesn't run out of power if you can't take a few shots. So there's really no reason why I shouldn't go for the cheaper 300

    I'm really sorry, having said so much, if it were me, I still wouldn't buy 300, because there is a better one than him, of course** around 2600, but his cost performance is really too high, that is, the cost performance is super high, and the popularity is super high, the number of people who use it exceeds, a Panasonic LX3 that has created a myth of regretting filial piety for 2 years, for players who are stupid enthusiasts, his name is thunderous, to put it simply, he is higher than 300, a grade higher, and it is essential, because he has 1 CCD, CCD

    However, the hallmark of the camera is the standard of the imaging effect level, and such a large CCD is extremely rare in a card machine of more than 2000 yuan. The only one below 3000 that can meet his standard is the Canon S95, but ** is close to 3000.

    I hope it can help you, it's up to you to choose.

Related questions
8 answers2024-05-21

The future is beautiful because we can't predict it. You can try to forget about him, after all, we all have a good life no matter who we lack. You're in graduate school now, and there are a lot of good men around. >>>More

6 answers2024-05-21

Choose the previous one,i3 and i5The difference is not very big,Is your graphics card the same?,It depends on the specific model of the graphics card,Are you looking at the HD3000 graphics card?,Integrated graphics card,It's not a separate display,How can it be so expensive,Your words,Use an i3 with an independent graphics card,This configuration is cost-effective,I'm selling a notebook,i5 with 2G independent display is also 6000,Top configuration,Where are you looking**Ah。

5 answers2024-05-21

Sometimes the sensitivity is too high, just set it to 100.

30 answers2024-05-21

If you are always entangled in one thing, you can use the following methods to adjust and**: 1. You can consider psychology**. >>>More

4 answers2024-05-21

From the comparison of these three cameras, I think they have their own advantages, the Canon IXUS 85 IS, because it is a mid-range card machine launched at the beginning of this year, has a lot of improvements in performance and configuration, such as increasing the sensor CCD size from 1 pixel to 10 million, with IS optical image stabilization system. At the same time, it brings Canon's most advanced face priority function and motion detection function, which has the performance of a high-end machine, and the Canon ixus 860 is the only wide-angle camera that Canon is currently on sale, and the overall performance is very good, and all aspects are relatively balanced, with no major shortcomings, and sales have been very good since it was launched. It is also a card player that has not been discontinued since it was launched last year, from which it can be seen that the Canon IXUS 860 has a position in the Canon card player, and finally; Casio S10 The biggest selling point of Casio S10 is the volume, its three-dimensional reach, the thinnest part of the fuselage is only, and the weight of the fuselage is only 113g, making it the smallest 10-million-pixel card machine on the market at present. >>>More