Rare rules of football, please experts!

B is now an additional yellow card can not be awarded, this yellow card is a yellow card for a second foul on team B, if the previous action is not a relatively large injury to the player, the referee will continue to play out of the principle of favoring the attack, if the additional is based on each referee's understanding of the rules, and the danger of his actions and the degree of injury to the player, this has nothing to do with whether team B has scored a goal.

The red card can sometimes be given to a player even if it is not a big move, because the accumulation, this accumulation is based on multiple warnings and big actions of individual players, but it is not a problem situation, if this gives a red card, it is unfair to that player, and the referee will not give a card for the card, so the seemingly simple result, in fact, the answer is b

I think both A and B are fine, it depends.

In fact, in the case of a lot of ambiguity on the field, the referee depends on the mood

It depends on the referee, whether to make up the first yellow card, plus the yellow card given for the second foul, the yellow card should be given a red card, if you don't make up, it is a yellow card, mainly depends on whether the referee wants to take out the card.

Red card, but no stoppage.

Red card and can be suspended.

It depends on the referee, if it is a strong team and it is a home team under pressure may point out a yellow card, the loyal and filial team is estimated to be directly sent off with a red card.

There is only a yellow card for a foul in front of you, and only a yellow card is awarded in the back due to the principle

First of all, Team A maliciously tackles Team B A and states that the action is at least yellow carded, then after Team A makes a foul on Team B with at least a yellow card, there are two situations:

First, the referee directly showed a red card for the first malicious foul of Team A. Because since the action is at least a yellow card, due to the different penalty scales between the referees, it is possible to directly show a red card;

Second, first show a yellow card for the first malicious foul of Team A, then show the yellow card again according to the second malicious foul, and then show the red card to send them off.

I have seen the referee show the same player twice in a row in the game and then show the red card again to send him off, but it is difficult to find it for the time being, please forgive me. You can refer to the episode "10 Red Cards" of World Football, which has a scene where two yellow cards are sent off in a row.

As for what Itarianofan said, it also makes sense, but after all, there are too many uncertainties in football matches, and there are too many differences in the penalty scale of the referee on duty. But if I were a referee, I would have sent him off, and as a footballer, a succession of large fouls in a short period of time is a sign of a lack of sportsmanship and should be punished. So I don't think there's a 100% right answer to the question asked by chyoubunki, it depends on the opinion of the referee on duty Otherwise, there wouldn't be so many controversial penalties in today's football, hehe

1. Score a goal.

A goal is scored when the ball crosses the goal line in its entirety between the goal posts and under the crossbar without a previous breach of the rules of the game.

2. The winning team.

The team with the most goals scored in the match is the winner. If both teams score an equal number of goals or neither team scores, the match will be a draw.

3. Competition Regulations.

The rules of the competition shall state whether a tiebreaker or such other steps as may be agreed by FIFA to determine the winner of the match if the match ends in a draw.

Fourth, the game becomes a dead ball.

The game is a dead ball in the following situations:

1. Pretend to be aware of the stool when the ball crosses the goal line or sideline from the ground or in the air;

2. When the game has been stopped by the referee.

5. The competition is conducted.

All other times are in progress, including:

1. The ball bounces back into the field from the goal post, crossbar or corner flagstick;

2. The ball bounces back into the field from the referee or assistant referee on the playing field.

FIFA Official Rules Translation: Scoring a goal in a soccer match means that within the effective time of the game, on the premise that no other rules of the game have been violated before, either side of the game will be considered valid when the whole of the football exceeds a certain goal line (definitely the whole, not the center of gravity).

Side Box: If the ball goes out of bounds in the air and then crosses the goal line in its entirety, the goal will be void (as is the case from a very rare corner).

A throw-in thrown in directly over the goal line is invalid and a goal kick is awarded.

The goalkeeper throws the ball with his hand and throws the ball directly to his own side or the opponent's goal (very rarely), and the goal is valid.

Indirect free kick goes straight to goal, the goal is invalid. However, as with a hand-tossed throw-in, if the ball is touched in the air by a part of the opponent's or player's body other than the hand, it crosses the goal line in its entirety.

I won't go into detail about the invalidity of goals that have committed fouls before, such as offside, handball goals, etc.

According to the rules, the ball crosses the goal line as a whole, which is the side of the net. However, the important thing is how the referee decides the penalty, because the ball speed at the moment of shooting is fast and the referee's position and the player's interference make there more misjudgments! Therefore, FIFA has been studying the introduction of goal-line referees in recent years.

But it's also part of football, isn't it! If you get too much technology, you're going to go to the point of football itself. However, now Adidas has a soccer ball with a chip that can determine whether it is crossing the goal line as a whole, but I don't see which league has used it.

Because after all, there are too few sentences that have been reversed!!

According to the rules, more than 50% (including 50%) of the sphere should enter the goal line, simply put, the center point of the ball enters the goal line, which is considered a goal, but there is no goal monitoring technology at present, so in most cases the ball enters the line.

The goal is scored only when the whole of the football is drawn vertically to the ground and does not touch the goal line.

The goal is only confirmed when the ball crosses the line as a whole. If the ball as a whole does not cross the goal line, no goal will be awarded. Because the goal line is part of the field.

The original rules have been revised.

But whether to score or not depends mainly on the judgment of the referee, and the so-called overall ball line is impossible to accurately capture even if it is a camera.

Go over the inside of the line (i.e. the outside edge of the net), and the ball should look like this!

is talking about the rules of football book (by David Agger, translated by Sun Baojie, Sun Baogang), page 47 is very clear:

The goal is only confirmed when the ball crosses the line as a whole. If the ball as a whole does not cross the goal line, no goal will be awarded. Because the goal line is part of the field.

To put it bluntly, the ball must all enter the white line, and if it is inside the white line, it will be considered a goal

It is definitely the goal line that goes into the net side of the net!!

The center line of football is scored after the center line of the goal line, after all, this thing still requires subjective judgment of people.

The ball goes over the inside of the goal line in its entirety.

It is the outer edge of the internal test (that is, the direction of the net) in which the ball crosses the line as a whole, and simply put, the internal test in which the whole of the football is drawn vertically with the ground and does not touch the goal line. . . In fact, there is a lot of controversy about the goal-line incident. Like the final in which England won the World Cup, it was the most famous one...

There are also many calls for electronic equipment in football to prevent the recurrence of these goal-line incidents, but this has not been implemented to this day. For example, on the left side of the diagram is a goal that has crossed the goal line as a whole. On the right side of the picture, although most of the ball has passed the internal test of the goal line, it has not been completely crossed, so this cannot be considered a goal.

r b 1 8。