My mother in law secretly destroyed my crops, where should I find reason?

If you secretly reply to your dealer, then you should first ask your husband what the situation is so that your husband can only call the police.

If the mother-in-law secretly returned to her own crops, I think this is an intra-family dispute, and this can be properly explained and communicated with the mother-in-law, but I think there is no need to quarrel. And it could even expand the situation.

If Popo secretly destroys your crops, I don't think it's necessary to talk to others, it's best for you to sit down and communicate with your mother-in-law.

Of course, you can also find the local ** department to report the situation, if the situation is serious, and there is evidence, you can also call the police.

You can find the head of your house or the secretary of the village branch

You may have a bit of a holiday with your mother-in-law, you should find relatives and friends to solve this problem, solve your own household affairs, and don't make a big deal out of it.

Housework should be resolved by the whole family. I think it's best to get your husband in touch with his mother. It is difficult for a clean official to cut off family affairs.

Housework can be reasonable. Only your husband can convince his mother. If you really can't solve it, you go to the police station and ask the police to deal with it.

FYI.

Make it clear to your husband first, you two stand on the same side to solve the problem.

Your mother-in-law secretly went back to your dealer's house, and you have no place to reason in this situation, after all, it is your own housework. If it is too big, it will have a bad impact on you.

If you can solve it at home, finding your husband is the best choice, and if you can't solve it at home, we can also go to the village committee or the police uncle.

The matter of the family is solved at home.

It is difficult for a Qing official to decide family affairs, so he can only rely on your husband to negotiate.

Your husband came forward to solve the problem, destroyed the crops, and if it was serious, he could be sentenced to the police.

That can only find your husband to communicate with his mother. Where to reason with these housework, it is difficult for a clean official to decide family affairs. Only his son can convince his mother.

You can go to the public security organ to report the case. If the public security organs can identify the perpetrators of the sabotage, they will be held accountable for administrative responsibility and criminal responsibility for the worst cases.

How to solve the problem of watering damage to other people's crops in another village.

In today's legal society, whoever calls the police shall present evidence, collect evidence, testimony, and witnesses, and submit civil compensation to the court in accordance with the general principles of the civil law and the civil procedure law in the face of the facts.

Yes, this is a crime of intentional destruction of citizens' property, and if the area is large, it is hatred of society.

Yes, this is called vandalism of other people's property.

Be able to prove that the land use rights are owned. Farming without consent is an infringement and is used legally.

The right holder has the right to remove the other party's crops and does not need to bear any responsibility. However, if there is a dispute over ownership, it may be suspected of the crime of sabotage of production and operation.

According to Article 34 of the "Provisions of the Supreme People's Procuratorate and the Ministry of Public Security on the Standards for Filing and Prosecution of Criminal Cases under the Jurisdiction of Public Security Organs (1)": "Cases of sabotage of production and business operations (Article 276 of the Criminal Law) Where, due to anger and retaliation or other personal purposes, machinery and equipment, mutilation of farm animals, or other methods are sabotaged in production and operation, a case shall be filed for prosecution: (1) Causing losses of 5,000 RMB or more to public or private property; (2) Destroying production and operation three or more times; (3) Gathering three or more people to openly disrupt production and operations; (4) Other circumstances that should be pursued for criminal responsibility for sabotaging production and operation.

Therefore, in order to constitute this crime, one of the above conditions must be met, not to say that there is no uniform standard. If the value of the wheat seedlings damaged by your home is about 1,500 yuan, it does not constitute a criminal offense, but its behavior violates the provisions of Article 49 of the Public Security Administration Punishment Law, and shall be given an administrative penalty for public security.

1. In accordance with Article 13 of the Land Management Law of the People's Republic of China, disputes over land ownership and use rights shall be resolved through negotiation between the parties; If the negotiation fails, it will be handled by the people. Disputes over land ownership and use rights between units owned by the whole people, between units under collective ownership, and between units owned by the whole people and units under collective ownership shall be handled by the people at or above the county level. Disputes over land use rights between individuals, between individuals and units owned by the whole people and collectively owned by the whole people, shall be handled by the people at the township level or the people at the county level.

Where the parties are dissatisfied with the disposition decision of the relevant people, they may file a lawsuit with the people's court within 30 days of receiving the notice of the disposition decision. Before the dispute over land ownership and use rights is resolved, neither party shall change the status quo of the land or destroy the attachments on the land. 2. If both parties believe that the right to use the land is their own, you can request the town or county to deal with it in writing, and if they refuse to reply, they can file an administrative lawsuit to sue them for administrative inaction, and let the court order them to deal with it; If the other party has no dispute over the land use right, it is a forcible use, and the other party can be sued directly. ‍

First of all, the landlord, don't panic, this is just a very small problem I want to ask, the redistribution of your field is decided by the township, and the big guy has also been divided, so the right to use the land has been pulled by your family, and he is illegally occupying other people's land The land management regulations clearly explain that all land belongs to the state, and citizens only have the right to use it Clean up the debris and will plant your own crops There is no responsibility at all Even if he is a little morally deficient If he wants to sue in the end, he will only lose However, your family is completely in accordance with the policy of ** There are no legal loopholes You don't take it seriously at all.

If there are legal procedures in the subdivision, it can be required to eradicate peanuts. And the other party's lawsuit will not be supported by the court.

Who do you talk to if the police don't help you? Now there are a lot of unreasonable things, caused by bad social atmosphere, find ** to try.

Does this have anything to do with the police? What is the land to be occupied in the village? The cultivated land in the countryside is not said to be occupied, now that the communication is so developed, the state has also vigorously improved the convenience policy, you can first call 12345 to respond to the problem, and then step by step information.

Find the above, the bigger the better, the bigger the better, can manage them, aqui te amo.

The psychologist who did the experiment above is Carol Dweck, a famous American psychologist who is now teaching at Stanford University, and she has made outstanding contributions in the fields of personality psychology, social psychology and developmental psychology. After decades of research, she discovered the relationship between mindset and success.

Saying this kind of thing in the circle of friends is obviously too low-level. Not only will others not sympathize with you, but they will also look down on you. If you are really panicked, you can find your girlfriend. Or a better colleague to confide in, but also to the point.

Don't gossip about other people, let alone gossip about your mother-in-law, and remember that trouble comes from your mouth.

Truth be told, it's best not to talk to anyone.

It is a voidable contract, and it is recommended that the court sue for rescission of this contract.