Qiu Chuan Gao Fa 2005 No. 497 Notice This document is a notice on the issue of the presentation of e

This kind of help should be rewarded.

BAI cross-examination refers to the parties, the litigant and the third person in court

Under the auspices of the version proposed by the parties and the third party of the DAO.

The activity or process of explaining and questioning the authenticity, legitimacy, relevance, and probative force of evidence. Cross-examination in a broad sense usually refers to the activities and processes of explaining, evaluating, questioning, rebutting, confronting, debating, and using other methods to show the validity of evidence by one party and its first person to the legality, relevance and authenticity of the evidence presented by the other party in litigation or arbitration activities, whether it has probative force, and whether it can be used as the basis for determining the facts of the case in the case. In a narrow sense, it refers only to the aforementioned activities carried out in litigation activities, in the exchange of evidence procedures or during the court investigation phase of the court proceedings.

Hello, it is to go to the court to confirm the evidence provided by both parties.

You are required to provide evidence to refute the other party's evidence.

It refers to going to the court to verify the evidence provided by the parties.

The original defendant examines and confronts the evidence materials submitted by the other party to ensure that the evidence is true and valid.

It is to refute the other party's evidence.

Whether or not the other party's documents are recognized.

To put it simply, cross-examination is to challenge the evidence of the other party in order to weaken or deny its probative force.

It usually refers to the legality of the evidence presented by one party and its ** person to the other party and its ** person, the relevance to the facts in dispute in the case, the authenticity of the evidence, whether it has probative force, the degree of probative force, whether it can be used as the basis for determining the facts of the case, the activities and processes of explanation, evaluation, questioning, debate, and the use of local methods to show the validity of the evidence.

Cross-examination is required. Except for evidence that the law expressly stipulates that it does not need to be cross-examined, all evidence has the effect of being accepted by the court only after cross-examination.

The presentation of evidence is to present evidence to the other party (the public prosecution or the criminal private prosecutor, the plaintiff in the criminal case attached to the civil case, etc.), while the cross-examination is to analyze, judge, and refute the evidence presented by the other party - of course, cross-examination also includes the other party's analysis, judgment, and refutation of the evidence presented by the other party. In litigation activities, it should be said that any piece of evidence should be cross-examined.

To prove is to prove what you want to prove with evidence; Cross-examination is to analyze the evidence of what the other party wants to prove, whether it is recognized or not.

To put it bluntly, the presentation of evidence is to present evidence to prove one's claim, while cross-examination is the process of arguing the evidence presented to achieve the court's acceptance of one's own evidence and the rejection of the evidence presented by the other party.

Article 73 of the Several Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Evidence in Civil Proceedings stipulates that if both parties separately adduce contrary evidence on the same facts, but neither has sufficient basis to deny the other party's evidence, the people's court shall, in light of the circumstances of the case, determine whether the probative force of the evidence provided by one party is significantly greater than that of the evidence provided by the other party, and confirm the evidence with greater probative force.

Therefore, if the evidence is insufficient, it is not necessary that the request will not be supported, and it should be judged according to the specific circumstances of the defendant's evidence.

1. If only the personal income certificate issued by the unit is insufficient.

2. In addition to the personal income certificate issued by the unit, the court can also provide the court with evidence such as the salary list of the employee's regular signature for receiving wages, the bank transaction record of the employee's receipt of wages, and the employee's proof of paying individual income tax. If there is original evidence of any of the above, it can generally play the role of proof, and the court will accept the salary income.

1. You can ask the judge why he didn't accept it.

2. Let the judge give you a reason first.

3. If it really doesn't work, the leader or financial officer of the applicant unit will testify in court.

4. Running water is not necessary, because many units are found gold. As a party, take up the law and defend your own rights.

The evidence in the effective judgment has not been cross-examined, and the BAI has not been verified by the court, so it will not be available.

zhi has the force of law!

Paragraph 1 of Article 35 of the Provisions on Several Issues Concerning Evidence in Administrative Litigation (hereinafter referred to as the "Evidence Provisions") stipulates that "evidence shall be presented in court and cross-examined at trial. Evidence that has not been debated at trial cannot be used as the basis for a verdict.

This provision establishes the basic principle of the rules of evidence: evidence must be presented in court and cross-examined, and evidence that has not been cross-examined cannot be used as the basis for a verdict.

Evidence that has not been debated cannot be admissible as evidence in a verdict. If it is as you say, it will lead to the initiation of the trial supervision process.

Evidence that has not been cross-examined will not be used in the verdict.

If you do not appeal or appeal within the statutory time limit, the opposing party can apply for enforcement on the basis of this judgment. Therefore, it still has legal effect, so it is best for you to file the relevant legal remedies as soon as possible.