Why is network governance and what are the problems existing in network social governance?

It's too insecure not to govern the network, and how many people are deceived every year, especially the Internet. Therefore, relevant departments should be governed in order to create a green network environment.

If you want to improve the ability of comprehensive network governance, you need to understand and grasp it from many aspects, such as the multiple cooperation of **, enterprises, and netizens, and everyone will work together to build a network environment; Use legal, technical, self-discipline, economic and other means to govern current network problems; The Internet and various industries should strengthen self-discipline to avoid fueling troubles or creating unhealthy trends on the Internet. Together, we come up with a "convention" to actively maintain the network environment while avoiding mistakes.

The Internet is a big circle, and there are many things in this circle that require everyone to collaborate to get it done. On the one hand, it is **, which is mainly responsible for agreeing on related behaviors; On the one hand, Internet enterprises should play a role in supervision and supervision; On the other hand, netizens must learn to supervise themselves and others, and stop or report behaviors that endanger social rights and interests in a timely manner. The network serves the public, and the public improves the network environment through their own strength, forming an interdependent relationship with each other.

We all know that the Internet is not a place outside the law, and those who make improper remarks at will will have to accept certain punishments. However, in terms of supervision and punishment, the implementation is not in place, so that some people have a fluke mentality and "behave mishaps" on the Internet. It may be possible to use multiple means to improve the network, such as legal, economic, communication technology means, self-regulation, etc.

Communication technology, in particular, has a place to be found, both in crime and in governance. We should make good use of technology, strengthen Internet governance, and make good use of big data.

Take the most popular "fan circle culture" as an example, on the surface, it is dominated by fans, but in fact, it is maliciously induced by some brokerage companies. They know what to do to make fans irrational. To govern the Internet, these companies must become self-disciplined.

There are also related problems, from the perspective of the company's technology, strengthening supervision is not a problem at all, the question is whether they are willing to do so.

There should be corresponding regulations, and the administrators of each platform should be allowed to manage, so that they can have a very good ability to rule, and they can also bring a green platform to many people.

There should be corresponding regulations and rules to improve the comprehensive governance capacity of the network, and it will also make many people not touch it in their lives, otherwise they may be banned.

It must be strictly supervised, and once the content of the violation is discovered, it must be rectified immediately, and the punishment should also be increased, and publicity should be strengthened.

Block information. If you see unreasonable and illegal articles, you will block them so that others cannot see them, as a method of network environment governance.

Legal basis: Article 7 of the Cyber Security Law of the People's Republic of China The state actively carries out international exchanges and consensus in areas such as cyberspace governance, cyber technology research and development and standard formulation, and combating cyber violations and crimes, promoting the construction of a peaceful, secure, open, and cooperative cyberspace, and establishing a multilateral, democratic, and transparent cyber governance system.

Improve the methods of social governance, adhere to systematic governance, adhere to governance according to law, adhere to comprehensive governance, and adhere to governance at the source.

1. Adhere to systematic governance. Social governance is not only a first-class job function, but also requires the participation of all sectors of society, and it is necessary to change from a first-class all-encompassing to a first-class leading and social common governance. Party committees should play the role of the core of leadership and bring into play the party's various advantages in social governance.

It is necessary to play a key role, take social governance as the basic function of society, and constantly improve the ability to lead and organize society. All sectors of society should actively participate in social governance, give play to the role of social organizations, give play to the coordinating role of the masses, and form a sound system of social governance.

2. Adhere to governance according to law. Adhering to the rule of law is an important part of the four comprehensive strategies, and of course social governance must also adhere to the law and change from control and regulation to rule of law protection. It is necessary to strengthen legal publicity, establish a rule of law mentality, improve the rule of law methods, and achieve a legal environment in which the law is used to solve problems and resolve contradictions.

Truly strengthen legislation in the field of social governance, promote law enforcement organs at all levels to strictly and fairly enforce the law, strengthen publicity and education on the rule of law, and carry forward the spirit of the rule of law.

3. Adhere to comprehensive management. Social governance cannot be carried out simply to eliminate violence, but must learn to apply new governance methods such as the Internet and the Internet, enter new social fields, and transform from a single means to a comprehensive use of multiple means. Pay attention to moral restraint, pay attention to regulating social behavior, pay attention to the use of education, consultation and other work methods, and pay attention to coordinating social relations.

4. Adhere to source governance. Social governance must be contradictory from the source, solve the problem at the source, and move forward to the source governance after disposal. It is necessary to attach great importance to understanding the people's feelings and opinions, to understanding the root causes of existing problems, to change from passive coping to focusing on curing the root causes, so that the threshold of social governance can be moved forward, and social contradictions can be resolved in the bud as much as possible.

It is necessary to pay attention to the formation of a long-term mechanism for social governance, turn effective social governance methods into systems, and further improve the mechanism for the participation of all parties.

Cyber governance is defined as: "the development and application of principles, standards, norms, decision-making steps and common planning in the development and use of the Internet by the State, private enterprises and civil society, each in accordance with their respective roles". This definition encompasses both the "technical governance" of the Internet (the development of the network) and the governance of the network (the use of the network).

This definition stipulates that no one category of actors can solve the problems posed by the Internet and its use on their own. It also affirms that different categories of actors – **, private business and civil society – should share responsibility.

1.Internal network governance.

That is, the relationship arrangement between shareholders, managers and employees within the company.

2.External corporate network governance.

That is, the relationship arrangement between the company and external stakeholders through formal contracts and implied contracts is made up of a grinding and weaving model.

How to view and govern the Internet is a global issue, and each country will have different choices due to its different legal systems, social forms, and cultural traditions, but those values and principles that are recognized by the world at the practical level should also be consistent in dealing with Internet affairs, and strive to achieve harmony in the online world.