School teachers are divided into groups to talk about those who understand the law

1. Yes, you are right. This is a seriously irresponsible practice of the school, and it is completely stupid to do it for the sake of pursuing the promotion rate.

2. It should be reported to the relevant education departments (Education Commission, Education Bureau).

3. Just reflect truthfully, there is nothing to be embarrassed about.

Article 171 of the General Principles of the Civil Law provides that those who encroach on the property of the state, the collective, or the property of others shall return the property, and if the property cannot be returned, compensation shall be made at a discounted price. Where the property of the State, the collective, or the property of others is damaged, it shall be restored to its original state or compensated at a discounted price. Where the victim suffers other major losses as a result, the offense.

The person shall compensate for the loss.

Article 245 of the Property Law, where the immovable or movable property in possession is encroached upon, the person in possession has the right to request the return of the original property; For acts that impede possession, the possessor has the right to request that the nuisance be removed or the danger eliminated; If damage is caused by encroachment or obstruction, the person in possession has the right to claim damages. If the possessor's right to claim the return of the original thing is not exercised within one year from the date of the misappropriation, the right to claim shall be extinguished.

Teachers don't usually do this at will, but you can report it to the head of your classmate's school or file a lawsuit in court if it's important.

The ownership of those things is yours, and there must be a legal basis for him to confiscate them, even if they are confiscated by the police. If you don't pay it back, call the police.

I found you a law, Article 66 of the Property Law, which prohibits any unit or individual from encroaching, looting, or destroying the lawful property of private individuals. The General Principles of the Civil Law also have a similar article. If it doesn't work, go to the police station, and remember to carry a P3 recording in your pocket as evidence.

To be sued, the defendants are: the village council, the person whose land is now cultivated.

Don't go to court. You have to find the village committee, the township (town)**, the land certificate issuing department, and the ** Letters and Visits Bureau. Let them explain why.

What you said is not right, his family is not from this village, his household registration is not there, and the land use certificate will not be renamed, it may be that the registration in the village has been replaced by his name.

Now it's time to collect evidence, see which documents are registered in his name, and then go to the local village committee, **, and the local land management office after it is clear.

In most cases, the premise for the perpetrator to bear legal responsibility is that his or her act is at fault.

My colleague is an adult, and I went to the river to swim together, and after the accident, you also rescued and called the police in time. . . Before or after, you are not at fault and do not have to bear any legal responsibility. There is no legitimate cause of action for the other party's family.

If you don't rescue or call the police after drowning, you will have to fight a lawsuit if you take a standby, but this problem is more serious, it is recommended that you go to the law firm to ask, not bad for hundreds of dollars.

He's a person with full capacity for civil conduct, right? Then it has nothing to do with you, it's an accident.

First of all, according to the principle of res judicata, the court will no longer accept a matter that has already been dealt with in a final instance.

Secondly, the statute of limitations for personal injury compensation and the statute of limitations for bodily injury is one year.

I don't think I will lose it again.

The statute of limitations has expired, and no further compensation will be made.

There is no good way!

During the existence of the relationship between husband and wife, the debts of either party are jointly borne and jointly and severally liable to each other.

If the loan cannot be repaid, the court will sue the court for enforcement of the property.

As for the loan shark, it is better to find a way to repay it, but if it is not possible, the other party can sue the court, and when the time comes, your sister will claim that the interest rate is too high, and will not admit that the part that is more than 4 times the bank interest in the same period.

For private loans as stipulated by law, the interest cannot be higher than 4 times the bank's interest in the same period!

The joint property of the husband and wife repays the loan, and the usury is originally a bad debt, so don't worry about it, don't call the police.

Look at how the relationship is, and if the relationship is good, we will get through the difficulties together. Sell the property to repay the loan shark first, and then find a way to take out the loan.

Certification alone is not enough, and the public security bureau can file a case, but it cannot prosecute, because there is not enough obvious evidence. Unless it's very clear what you stole and what happened to you. Now the item is in** and so on.

Yifei Legal Answers:

He is probably scaring you, did you steal yourself best, did not steal, what are you afraid of?

So did you steal or not? If you steal it, will it cost 500 yuan? If you don't steal, don't worry.

It depends on what you stole and how much it's worth.

Your mother is already suspected of bigamy, and your father can go to court to charge her with bigamy and file a divorce lawsuit at the same time.

The self-built house was built before the marriage of the parents, so the house is the joint property of the parents and should be divided equally in the event of a divorce.

1.If the marriage certificate is torn up but the Civil Affairs Bureau has registered it, the marriage relationship still exists. But in your case, divorce isn't a big deal. The problem is the division of matrimonial property.

2.If you want a house, you can negotiate with money, but it must be counted as marital property.

Divorce by agreement! Both parties can sign a divorce agreement and then take the household registration book and ID card to the place where the household registration is located. It belongs to the joint property before the marriage, so divide it equally.

However, your mother has another family, which is considered to constitute the crime of bigamy. She is at fault, and the property can be divided less.

After 3 years of separation, you can file for divorce, and the following information is required: 1Hukou 2Plaintiff's ID card. 3.Indictment. The house is joint property. If you want it, give half of your mother's money.

Zhejiang lawyer Sun:

It is common for you to find the defendant's property if you have the means to find it, you can ask the court to enforce it.

As for the judge's argument that the judge swallowed money, it is not easy to talk nonsense.

Hello! You can apply directly for execution.

Lawyer Wang Yue.