Does Idealism Recognize the Agency of Consciousness? , I am very confused

Subjective idealism is not only an acknowledgement, but also an exaggeration of the agency of consciousness, believing that human consciousness can influence everything;

Objective idealism holds that it is the consciousness of God that controls everything;

So, radical idealism acknowledges and exaggerates the active role of consciousness.

The idealist is not a question of admitting or not acknowledging the agency of consciousness, he believes that there is only consciousness in the world, there is no matter, or that matter is only a derivative of consciousness, and that with consciousness there can be matter. The agency of consciousness is the reaction of consciousness to matter, and its premise is the recognition that matter determines consciousness, so there is no question of the agency of consciousness for idealists.

I'm not a philosopher, but I'll understand it in general.

Agency means that consciousness has a reaction to matter, matter determines consciousness, but consciousness can also affect matter. This is in materialism.

Idealism, on the other hand, holds that consciousness determines matter, so there is no such thing as agency.

Hehe. The agency of consciousness is what Marx called subjective agency. This is not necessarily linked to idealism.

To understand things, we must understand materialistically, and through the understanding of objective things, we are exerting our subjective initiative and constantly practicing negation. The development of everything is like this.

Idealism has a different understanding of consciousness, which is divided into subjective idealism and objective idealism. Idealism, especially subjective idealism, places great emphasis on the active role of consciousness and exaggerates it as the only being. Voluntarism, for example, is like that.

Idealism one-sidedly emphasizes the role of consciousness, exaggerates the active role of consciousness, and denies the premise that matter determines consciousness!

Mistake. Consciousness reflects objective reality, and objective reality is the content of consciousness, so the content of consciousness is objective.

1. The content of consciousness is objective.

Matter determines consciousness. Consciousness is a subjective reflection of objective existence (i.e., consciousness is dependent on matter). Its content is based on objective reality, not based on human consciousness, leaving objective things, consciousness can neither produce nor develop, whether it is the correct consciousness, or the wrong, illusory consciousness is in the final analysis a reflection of objective existence, all in the objective world, can find the original form from objective existence, people in the future ** is based on objective things and make an advanced reflection, rooted in the past, the present objective existence) Therefore, the content of consciousness is objective;

2. The form of consciousness is subjective.

It means that consciousness has subjective characteristics, consciousness exists in the subject, it is the function of the human brain, the thinking process of consciousness is a process of subjective regulation, its reaction form is subjective, it is something that has been transformed by the mind, it is a subjective reflection of objective existence, and different people have different reflections on the same thing.

Objective idealism holds that there exists an objective spirit independently of the real world, which is the origin of the world, and from which everything in the world is produced (derived). Its famous representatives include Zhu Xi of China, Plato of ancient Greece and Hegel of Germany.

Subjective idealism takes people's subjective spirit (consciousness, concepts, etc.) as the starting point for understanding the world, and what exists in the subjective spirit is the cognitive world, which is the product of the subjective spirit, not the real objective world. The main representatives include China's Lu Jiuyuan and Wang Shouren, and Germany's Fichte.

No, "valuation" does not mean consciousness. If you only believe in the consciousness of the self, then you are subjective idealism. Subjective idealism is one of the basic forms of idealism.

It reverses the relationship between thinking and existence, between spirit and matter, regards man's subjective consciousness as the origin of the world, and regards everything in the world as the product of man's subjective consciousness. In the end, it leads to "solipsism" that only acknowledges the existence of "me".

First, the nature is different.

1. Idealism: A general term for all abstract things.

2. Voluntarism: a pioneering school of modern humanistic philosophy.

Second, the origin is different.

1. Origin of idealism: Practical idealism is the idealistic manifestation of social forces as "practical consciousness" on a certain economic basis. Marx called this economic basis "existing economic boundaries", "existing modes of production" or "civil society".

Tracing the formation and development of these material bases is a prerequisite for understanding the concept of practical idealism, and the division of labor is the key to the problem.

2. The origin of voluntarism: As the original theoretical form of irrationalism, voluntarism regards irrational will as the origin of the universe and the essence of all things. It puts the will at the top of the spirit and regards the will as the supreme principle of existence.

The voluntarist factor has a long history in the history of philosophy. The philosophies of Augustine and Scott have a voluntaristic tendency.

Kant's theory of free will belongs to the theoretical premise of modern theory of will. Schopenhauer's 1819 publication of The World as Will and Appearance marked the birth of voluntarist philosophy.

Third, the main representatives are different.

1. The main representatives of idealism: famous representatives, such as Zhu Xi of China, Plato of ancient Greece and Hegel of Germany.

2. The main representatives of voluntarism: the main representatives are Schopenhauer and Nietzsche.

The error of idealism on the question of the nature of consciousness lies in the fact that a. exaggerating the decisive role of matter on consciousness b denying the decisive role of consciousness on matter c denying the dependence of consciousness on matter d. one-sided emphasis on the dependence of consciousness on matter this topic may be more closely related to philosophy, and according to my limited philosophical system, it may be necessary to choose c, the error of idealism lies in denying the dependence on matter, overemphasizing the role of consciousness and ignoring the existence of matter determines the existence of consciousness, Consciousness needs to depend on the quality of things to exist. To quote the encyclopedia's detailed explanation: "Materialism holds that the world is absolutely objective and absolutely material, that everything is absolutely real, that everything evolves by itself, and that it is independent of consciousness.

The core of idealism is that the world is not absolutely objective, and the world depends on consciousness to exist, and the god of objective idealism refers to abstract spirits rather than concrete gods. Subjective idealism refers to the fact that everything such as subjective spirit and consciousness originates from the subjective essence and the sum of the immaterial nature in nature, and the world of absolute idealism refers to the world of consciousness, which will be far-fetched to be understood as solipsism if it stands in the perspective of materialism. If we do not look at the specific laws of things at a specific time, many doctrines and hypotheses may have the possibility of being wrong, so we need to constantly self-correct and adapt to the ever-changing world.

We can also find that there will be many logical loopholes in the idealism when talking about righteousness, and it is impossible to prove its own point of view through specific factual evidence, so once it denies the dependence of consciousness on matter, then it may go to some extreme, and many things in human nature and society have not yet been absolutely determined, and the truth is also constantly developing, only by constantly updating the knowledge system, down-to-earth implementation, giving full play to the subjective initiative of human beings, and building a beautiful home according to the objective principles and laws of things, is the knowledge we are looking forward to. The above is for reference only. zq

Idealism. The idealist line of cognition denies that cognition is the reflection of the human brain on the objective world, and holds that cognition precedes matter and man's practical experience. Among them, subjective idealism believes that human cognition is subjectively self-generated and is born to know.

Objective idealism holds that human knowledge is the product of divine revelation or some objective spirit.

The ancient Greek philosopher Plato believed that there is an idea world independent of the real world, and human knowledge is the first to know and recall the ideas in it, so he put forward the idea that knowledge is memory. Although the statements and manifestations of various schools of idealistic philosophy are different, they all deny the objectivity of cognition, deny that cognition is the reflection of the human brain on the objective world, and are essentially idealistic transcendentalism, making cognition a source of water and a tree without roots.

Idealism is divided into subjective idealism and objective idealism.

Voluntarism should be a branch of subjective idealism.

So idealism is not the same as voluntarism, and idealism includes voluntarism.