What are the techniques of arguing and rebuttal, and the argument will refute the skills of the othe

The rebuttal skills of the debate competition are as follows: 1. Pointing out the wrong skills, that is, not asking the question head-on, but pointing out the logical, theoretical, factual and flaws in the question asked by the other party, which makes it fall into an embarrassing situation. 2. Fallacy attribution skills, that is, not to be positive about some problems, but to generalize them and extend them to fallacies, pointing directly to the fallacies at their ends, and falling into a passive situation. 3. Rhetorical questioning skills, that is, asking the paradox, paradox, irrationality, and logic of the question from the opposite direction, so as to turn the passive into the active.

4. Humor skills, that is, in the face of the problem of being calm and wise, and being silent with the other party at the right time, the effect must be excellent. 5. Short answer skills, for a word, a word, an idiom, a sentence can be answered, and can be trapped in the other party's passive questions, it should be used decisively and timely. 6. Enlightenment skills, for those debaters who like to talk endlessly and have the desire to speak and are easy to be emotional, not easy to be calm and rational, the debaters who are expressive, and the debaters who are verbose and complicated, may wish to skillfully inspire his teaching consciousness when asking questions, and let them talk endlessly, the direct effect is to consume the other party's prescribed time.

7. Expose the cheats skill, when the problem is solved, cleverly and reasonably reveal its drawbacks. It is like the defects and contradictions in a person's statement and questioning, the contradiction between the former question and the latter question, the contradiction in two or more personal questions, and so on. By revealing its shortcomings and contradictions, and making its problems themselves untenable, defense will turn into attack, and the goal will naturally be achieved.

Expand your knowledge: Debate tournaments are also called debate tournaments, and they are also called debate meetings. In form, it is a kind of competition in which the two parties debate on a certain issue, but in fact, it is a competition of related knowledge, a competition of thinking and response ability, a competition of language expression ability, and a competition of comprehensive ability.

The technique of arguing and rebutting is to prove that the opponent's argument is wrong, thus overturning the opponent.

1. First of all, learn to listen.

Whether in the discussion or in the course of the competition, listen carefully to what others have to say before expressing your own opinions. Not only is it a matter of politeness, but interrupting someone at will can make people feel that they are refuting the other person out of their point of view, and if it does not match what the other person is saying, it is counterproductive.

2. Secondly, we must be confident.

Self-confidence can exert the ability of 120, and the extra 20 is because of the convincing feeling that your self-confidence brings. If you're timid, you'll probably be able to bring out half of your abilities.

3. Then learn to think.

Beginners in debate always think of what to say and rely on their instinct to refute it. An experienced debater always refutes after thinking, and it may feel like a direct rebuttal is not as effective at the time, but you have fallen into his trap.

4. Then there is the need to think logically.

Analyze the framework of the other party's system, ** the key points that the other party will demonstrate, and find out the loopholes in the argument. Personally, I prefer to draw and analyze, which is very intuitive. It is easy to find out the vulnerabilities of the opponent and make effective attacks or arguments.

The main argument of the attack is the most direct and effective way to attack. However, when the opponent's main argument is mostly complete, if you insist on hitting the main point of attack, it may be in vain, at this time, we should make some adjustments, first set aside a part of the time to attack the secondary argument, and when the opponent panics, then attack the main argument, so that the opponent is flustered and cannot deal with the comprehensive, so as to achieve our goal of refuting the argument.

5. Don't speak too fast at the end.

Speaking too fast can make people lose sight of what you are trying to say and be detrimental to your argument. A normal pace of speech can make you feel calm and confident.

The skills of refutation are: 1. Pointing mistakes. 2. Fallacy techniques.

3. Rhetorical questioning skills. 4. Humor skills. 5. Short answer skills.

6. Mentoring skills. 7. Fraud unmasking skills and so on. 1. Pointing to the wrong technique, that is, not asking the question head-on, but pointing out the problems of the other party in logic, theory, fact, value, position, expression and common sense, so that it falls into an embarrassing situation.

2. Fallacy attribution skills, that is, not to be positive about some problems, but to generalize them and extend them to fallacies, pointing directly to the fallacies at their ends, and falling into a passive situation. 3. Rhetorical questioning skills, that is, asking the paradox, paradox, irrationality, and logic of the question from the opposite direction, so as to turn the passive into the active. 4. Humor skills, that is, in the face of one's own calm and intelligent competition, the effect is excellent.

5. Short answer skills, for words, words, idioms, and sentences that can be answered clearly, and can be used in a passive way, it should be used decisively and in a timely manner. 6. Enlightenment skills, when asking questions, you may wish to skillfully inspire his teaching consciousness, let him talk endlessly, and its direct effect is to consume the other party's prescribed time. 7. Expose the cheats skill, when the problem is solved, cleverly and reasonably reveal its drawbacks.

It is like the defects and contradictions in a person's statement and questioning, the contradiction between the first question and the latter question, the contradiction in two or more personal questions, and so on.

Hope this helps

Questions. Mainly, snail flour without chili peppers and pig's feet is snail flour without a soul.

Isn't the current teacher a teacher who doesn't use chalk in class?

How do you refute the other party?

Sorry dear, you have opened the next topic, you can end this list, and re-initiate the consultation [happy].

I hope you can understand [happy].

Questions. What the.

But you haven't answered my question yet.

But you haven't answered my question yet.

Your first question: Techniques for refuting others, I've answered it for you.

Thank you for your understanding that you can close this order and re-initiate the consultation.