Speed of production is more important than quality Agree?

If we disagree, we should look at the problem in two parts, and we should grasp two key points, one main issue.

Therefore, the speed of production is just as important as the quality.

But as far as the operation of a manufacturer is concerned: there can be special.

This is a false proposition, the professional level and quality of accounting are always the first, and on this basis, it can be fast.

You did 100 multiple-choice questions quickly, got a satisfactory 0 points, and everyone was happy.

To consider this issue scientifically, increasing motivation is only one aspect. Lean manufacturing can solve this problem. Through process reengineering, standardize and simplify the work process, and teach employees to be proficient in this process and comply with this process.

Through 6S, do a good job of on-site management. Do a good job in the timely, accurate and full distribution of materials, smooth logistics channels, materials, tools, and equipment are placed according to the fixed position. By doing this, both the speed and quality of production will increase.

There should be an incentive mechanism for workers to work more and get more and cash out every month. Practice tells me: the effect is not too good!

Speed is important when running, and quality is important when assessing.

When you're doing a repetitive and boring job, you should respond with speed.

Get to the point. If you're in a hurry, you need speed. If not in a hurry, quality.

Sometimes the time required to complete the work is very tight, but there are many components to deal with, so speed is the main thing. A lot of work reflects the characteristics of uselessness and urgency, so it is best to accumulate more at ordinary times.

Nani, said she didn't understand the question.

What does it mean if you don't understand the question?

For a production company, whether quality is more important or speed is more important.

Quality and speed are equally important, but if you insist on separating a superior, of course, quality is more important, and quality is the most fundamental factor for the survival of an enterprise.

The important thing is management, no matter how slow your production speed is in a factory, if you don't manage it well, employees will still be in a hurry to finish things quickly, strict management and requirements, strict quality inspection, and rework if you don't do well. The corresponding production speed is also slow.

Mass and velocity are two different physical quantities, and there is no necessary connection between them, and of course under the relativistic effect, mass increases with velocity, and if you talk about importance, I personally think that mass is more important than velocity, and with mass, velocity makes sense, and you can multiply energy, unless, of course, you are a so-called photon.

Which is more important, quality or speed? Quality should be important, only to maintain good quality, there will be a safe speed.

What about this problem?

It can only be said that mass is more reflective of the essential properties of an object.

Velocity is a reflection of the state of an object.

It's hard to say which is more "important".

It's all important, depending on what you do.