How to deal with the blitzkrieg of WWII Germany 20

Updated on military 2024-06-11
14 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    First use satellites to reconnoiter enemy assembly areas, and then build a nuclear bomb to the enemy assembly area, which is a direct matter.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    In the rear there must be enough anti-aircraft firepower, and with less air force, the German soldiers are less powerful by half.

    Increase the depth on the front, let the main force in, and use the method of encirclement. Then there is the destruction of roads, which paralyze armored forces.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    Since faced with such a powerful cluster of armor, the only effective way is a massive air strike!

    In addition, it is okay to plant more mines!

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    A blitzkrieg is a surprise attack that is comprehensive and fast.

    The most direct and effective way to do this is to get information in advance.

    To be careful, the Soviets dragged the German blitzkrieg with the weather (I hate Mao Zi is obviously a red fascist).

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    1. Large depth configuration, space for time.

    2. Frontal resistance and destruction of traffic arteries.

    3. The most important thing is to strike at its supply lines from behind the back of small troops.

    These are the practices of Soviet Russia in World War II.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    Blitzkrieg suppresses Blitzkrieg and frustrates him with his first attack Strategic Depth or directly in his rear.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    This lightning tactic changed quickly, and the Germans concentrated their speed, these two strategic elements were used to give the opponent a fatal blow before the opponent could react, making the opponent unguardable.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    The reason why lightning tactics are difficult to deal with is that they are very fast and very powerful, and if they can't resist the first wave of attacks, they can easily fall quickly.

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    They tend to deal heavy blows to the enemy when they are not reacting, and they will use aircraft, tanks and armored vehicles to carry out a strong attack.

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    Hello dear, according to your question, I have already helped you find out, what did France accompany in World War II to blitz Germany: Before World War II, the French army was strong and not inferior to the German army, but it surrendered soon after the official engagement, which cannot be completely blamed on the French army. Mistakes at the decision-making level 1

    The Anglo-French forces relied on the impregnable Maginot Line in eastern France. The Maginot Line was a heavily constructed fortification by France after World War I to prevent a German invasion. The Maginot Line is deep and vast, with a large number of blockhouses, trenches and other permanent fortifications, as well as a small train dedicated to transporting ** ammunition and soldiers, which has all kinds of facilities, and even stadiums and other facilities for soldiers to enjoy and recreation.

    The Maginot Line was a comprehensive set of fortifications, and if Germany attacked from the Maginot Line in northeastern France, it would advance slowly and suffer heavy losses, and Britain and France also had high hopes for the Maginot Line. 2.The Anglo-French forces deployed heavy military groups in northwestern France, and it was difficult for Germany to tear open.

    After the French Maginot Line was blocked, the Germans were likely to carry out the strategy of World War I, which was to attack northwestern France from the direction of the Netherlands and Belgium, and in order to prevent this strategic scenario of Germany, the Anglo-French forces deployed a large number of troops here, far outnumbering the Germans. Hope mine can help you.

  11. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    During World War II, the German blitzkrieg caught Western countries off guard, and Guderian used his genius strategic ideas to make the German army invincible in the European theater, not only defeating France, but also playing a great advantage in the Soviet-German battlefield, and even the Allies unanimously agreed with Guderian's military command ability after the war.

    But why didn't Japan use blitzkrieg on the battlefield of resistance against Japan? You must know that the German army and Japan are allies, and there is no reason why Japan will not learn the essence of this, and a large part of the reason is that Japan and Germany are very different militarily.

    First of all, Japan did use blitzkrieg in the early days of the war, and it took three months to destroy China, but it was found that China's counterattack was too strong, and once the blitzkrieg began, China could always have a way. In the early stage, the Japanese offensive was very fierce, and successively conquered Shanghai, Jiangsu, Shandong, Anhui, Zhejiang, Hebei and other places, but after that, the offensive gradually slowed down.

    China's terrain is different from Europe's, the huge strategic depth cannot guarantee that Japan can break through, plus the rear materials cannot be the first long front, Japan has to stay behind every time it occupies a city, so the blitzkrieg does not work in China.

    Geographically speaking, China is mountainous and hilly, and has a completely different topography from the Eastern European Plain, where Poland is located. Even if the Japanese did not use massive armored forces to break through, they could only use infantry that was more flexible and adapted to the terrain. Even then, it was difficult to crush the defenders in a short time.

    Until the Japanese surrender in 1945, Fujian was not occupied on a large scale.

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    First, Japan is much behind Germany and does not have such a high level of mechanization. In the Chinese battlefield, the Japanese soldiers rode bicycles a lot of the time, which was amazing.

    Second, Japan has not fought a blitzkrieg. The battle for Singapore was a mini-blitzkrieg.

    Third, China and Europe have different economic dependence. Europe's economic population is concentrated in the cities, while China is scattered in the countryside. The capture of large cities by the blitzkrieg could not disintegrate and control China's economy and population, so the blitzkrieg was of little use after it was fought, and a large number of troops were locked up by the countryside and guerrillas, and the further back they fought, the more difficult it became.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    Germany blitzed Poland, France and other countries.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    Airway synergy blitzed Poland.

Related questions
12 answers2024-06-11

Germany blitzed Poland, France and other countries.

17 answers2024-06-11

At the end of World War I, Poland did not stop after the restoration of the country, first, Poland took advantage of the weakest time of the Soviet Union to defeat the Soviet Red Army under the city of Warsaw. The signing of the Treaty of Riga, about 10,000 square kilometers were ceded to Poland, which was the Soviet Union's "hatred" of Poland; Second, according to the "Versailles Treaty", Germany was divided into two after World War I, and Britain and France also assigned the Danzig region to Poland in order to make Poland also have a coastline, and the "Danzig Corridor" was Germany's "hatred" for Poland; Third, because of the desire to establish the image of a great power, in a short period of time, Poland had six wars with Lithuania, Romania, the Czech Republic, Germany, and the Soviet Union, and the Polish army also reached 800,000 people. The wretched will have something to hate. >>>More

12 answers2024-06-11

The Battle of Leyte Gulf refers to the general term for four relatively independent but interrelated naval and air battles and several other sporadic naval and air battles that took place in the waters around Leyte Gulf in the Philippines between October 23 and October 26, 1944. >>>More

12 answers2024-06-11

The first to fight the Czechs was to forcibly send troops to take over the Sudetenland under the pretext of "protecting the Germans in the Sudetenland" of the Czech Republic, and then annexed the whole of the Czech Republic, it should be said that Czechoslovakia, without fighting. >>>More

28 answers2024-06-11

What is the theory upstairs At that time, the largest debtor of the United States was the United Kingdom, followed by France, that is to say, if Germany destroyed Britain and France, the United States would go bankrupt, at that time resources were tight, and the United States made a fortune by selling arms, but at that time, the war continued, and it was impossible to have full cash payment, so it could only be in debt, and at the beginning of World War II, Britain and France owed the United States more than 20 times more than Germany (I remember this number, only a little more) That is to say, the famine owed by World War I has not been paid off Therefore, the United States can only choose a position to stand on the side of Britain and France. There is also the fact that Hitler's goal was not to conquer the whole world, at least he did not mean to destroy Britain. Otherwise, Dunkirk would not have given the British a chance, and his goal was to capture France, stabilize Britain, and destroy the Soviet Union, so as to turn the whole of Eastern Europe into his own resource base. >>>More