I m on the right side of the debate that it is more important to repay your parents and spirit 20

As parents, they are very happy to see their children happy, and it can be said that this is the greatest comfort they can get from leaving this world with peace of mind. They don't want their children to have much success, they just want them to be safe. Being able to see them often and know their living conditions is what they are most happy about, and this is the joy that can't be exchanged for a million, so I think it's important to repay your parents spiritually.

Because children are the flesh that falls from their parents, for them there is only giving, not taking.

But the only thing is to let them know:

Their "heart" is always thinking about them;

Their "flesh of heart" is always at peace;

Who doesn't think the flesh of their body is the most important thing?

Mother, it is with our hearts, that is to say, their love for us is great and selfless, love is from the heart, it is the spirit that can make them keep their love for us forever, so we must also use our hearts to our parents, to pay attention to them spiritually, love them, to put it bluntly, because"Love" "Love".Thank you.

A classic statement? As long as you think about how your parents used to love you, you will feel that every word you say is classic.

Both spiritual and material are important, but there is a greater inclination towards spirituality. The elderly will feel lonely when they are old, as the saying goes: young couples are old companions.

When you're old, you want to have a companion. The enrichment of their material goods by the sons and daughters can only solve temporary problems. Spiritual enrichment is not something that ordinary people can just give.

In fact, what you are asking in the final analysis is that the main question is spirit, and the material itself is embodied by the spirit drive!

I think a combination of both sides is the best.

Let's talk about the material satisfaction of our parents, but in order to prevent for example, foreign parents pay more attention to spiritual education, and children can work at a very young age, in short, we want to refute the positive viewpoint, you list some positive viewpoints and then think about the negative side, reverse thinking.

I think....Both spiritual and material are needed!

Our parents gave birth to us and raised us, and it took a lot of mental and material resources. From the time we were born, until we became adults, got married, and made contributions, our parents have been worrying about us, they have continuously spent a lot of money, from when we were young, to our complete self-reliance, our parents spent no less than hundreds of thousands, if we only give them spiritual rewards, a few words of holiday congratulations, and do not make trouble at ordinary times, is this morally justifiable? Will our consciences be at peace then?

No, definitely not. If there is no us, the life of parents will be better, their life must be more comfortable, and, looking at the current society, some people are reluctant to have children not only because of family planning, but it is too expensive to raise a child well, and it is better not to raise a child well, so we must repay our parents at the material level, and we must think about our parents when we eat a good meal, and we must not compete with them for the last bite of food. This is not only our traditional virtue, but also the appeal and demand of conscience.

Again, we have a problem: the material dimension is greater than the spiritual dimension. That is to say, there are both spiritual and material levels, but they are transcended on the spiritual level, and more important are on the material level, Marx said that people can only engage in politics, science, and culture if they eat, dress, and sleep first, and similarly, the material foundation determines the spiritual level. Therefore.