The parents gave all the property to their son, does the daughter still have to provide for the elde

Daughters need to be supported in old age. The right of the parents to whom the property is given, no one has the right to interfere. Supporting her parents is the obligation of a daughter.

According to the provisions, if the parents do not fulfill the obligation to support them, the minor children or the adult children who cannot live independently have the right to demand that the parents pay child support. Parents who fail to fulfill their obligation to support their adult children, or who lack the ability to work or who have difficulties in living, have the right to demand maintenance from their adult children.

We need to be clear that the obligation to support our children is statutory and will not disappear because of the unfair distribution of property by parents. The law stipulates that adult children have the obligation to support and support their parents, and no one may change it in any way or for any reason, nor may it be restricted by any conditions. Parents who do not fulfill their maintenance obligations, lack labor or have difficulties in living have the right to demand maintenance from their adult children.

Therefore, it is the right of parents to leave property to other children, but they have to fulfill their maintenance obligations to their parents no matter what. The right of the parents to dispose of property and the obligation of the children to support their parents are not reciprocal.

If the parents have more than one child, then each child should have a maintenance obligation. It stands to reason that when a parent gives most or all of the property to a particular person, that person should have a greater obligation to support. In real life, children can afford the corresponding share according to the actual situation and financial ability, and children who are not by their parents' side can also meet their parents' needs for life and medical care.

Therefore, the maintenance obligations of multiple dependents are actually equal. If a child does not support his or her parents, the parents can sue him or her for alimony and bear the obligation to support him. However, a child cannot directly sue a child for non-performance of maintenance obligations, unless the parents have entrusted them to sue in their name to remedy their rights.

If there is sufficient evidence, the court will support the request for joint maintenance, and if the other party still refuses to enforce, it can also apply to the court for enforcement.

How parents deal with property is their business, and supporting parents is the responsibility of children, this is prescribed by law, if parents give property to their sons, and daughters can not share a little benefit, then it is a great pity, your parents are patriarchal, and at the same time have a little bit of contempt for you, although it is not appropriate from the logical aspect, but if they want you to pay alimony.

You also have to pay, but you can be a cheater or push the pond in other ways and don't give it, these ways are personal habits and behaviors.

Your parents still have that traditional concept, in fact, as children, whether they are sons or daughters, they have the right to inherit their parents' property, even if they are patriarchal, daughters should also inherit a part of the property, of course, then again, if parents, make a will, want to give all the property to their sons, not to their daughters, in law, it is also reasonable, but if the daughter does not want to fulfill the obligation to her parents, it is illegal! If he raises you young, you have to raise him old, although you have not inherited a property, but you have the obligation to support the elderly!

Personally, I think that the inheritor of the property must support the elderly, but as a daughter, after all, the old man is the relative who raised you, and the grace of nurturing cannot be forgotten, and it is appropriate to honor your parents.

Of course, the law stipulates that children have an obligation to support their parents.

Although it is very unfair, but the law has the obligation to provide for the parents, and it is generally discussed in private, if it is all given to the son, then the son should raise it, and the daughter often visits her parents or gives some money.

Parents give all their property to their sons, and daughters must of course be filial. Although the parents did not leave the property to their daughter, after all, the parents gave their daughter life. The daughter may feel uncomfortable, but as long as the maintenance obligation is fulfilled, the minimum guarantee that should be given every month, and the living expenses are sufficient, after all, the parents are not in place, as long as the conscience of the daughter is passable, and there is no regret.

There is no contradiction between the fact that the property is given to the son voluntarily by the parents and the pension provided for the parents, and the daughter also has the obligation to support the elderly.

According to the provisions of the Civil Code, parents have the obligation to support their children, and children have the obligation to support their parents. There are no strings attached to this provision. In addition, the Civil Code stipulates that citizens have the right to dispose of their own property independently.

Therefore, the fact that a parent gives property to anyone does not affect the obligation of the children to support them, because the parents have raised them, so maintenance is necessary. If the daughter feels that it is unfair, she can try to sue, but there is little hope, because the parents' own property, whether it is a gift or a will, is their right to give it to anyone, and the child only has the right to passively accept it.

Although the parents did not give the property to the daughter, but the daughter was also born to the parents, then there is an obligation to support the parents, which is stipulated by law.

No matter what the old man does, the old man has also raised his daughter, and the daughter also has the responsibility to provide for her parents. It's just that the old man is really too partial to do this, and the daughter can negotiate with her son to reduce some of the responsibility.

It is also necessary to provide for the elderly, because you are also the father, the father raised by the mother's biological parents, and the mother raised us when we were young, so we have to support them for the old, which is natural, as for the father, the mother left all the property to the son, then there is no way to the father, the mother's property is only handled by the father and the mother.

Even if the daughter does not receive an inheritance, she has an obligation to support her.

There are a lot of phenomena. As a daughter, you have the obligation to support your parents; Your parents have the right to dispose of their own property; There is no such thing as "no property can be left unmaintained". You can do it.

Although your parents didn't give you property, it was not easy for him to raise you so big, and you still need to provide for the elderly, but if your parents are sick, you don't have to pay.

According to Article 1067 of the Civil Code, parents who fail to fulfill their maintenance obligations and lack the ability to work or have difficulties in living have the right to demand alimony from their adult children.

I think these are two different things, parents have the obligation to raise their children, and children also have the obligation to support their parents, as for the right of the elderly to whom the property is given. Of course, there may be irrationalities.

Even if the parents do not give their daughter a share of the property, the daughter should support her parents. If the parents give all the property to their son, it is their fault, and you can get your share back through judicial channels.

Although the parents have given all the property to the son, the daughter is still obliged to support her.

Even if the parents do not give their children property, the children have an obligation to support their parents. The son will naturally pay more when he gets the property, and the daughter will visit and care for her parents more when she is fine.

Legally speaking, there is still this obligation, and if I am also a girl from a personal point of view, I don't think it is fair to her.

These are two different things.

On the one hand, the property belongs to the parents, and he can leave it to any child he wants. On the other hand, you have a maintenance obligation to your parents.

I think it's okay to take a look at it during the New Year's holiday, after all, your parents also treat you as an outsider, and there is a kind of patriarchal preference for women in this way. Isn't it true that many people give birth to sons just to support the elderly, and give him all their property, so the designation is to let him support the elderly.

To whom does he have the right to distribute the property of his parents? As a child, you still have to provide for the elderly.

I gave all my property to my son, does my daughter still have to support her in old age? I think that the parents gave all their property to their sons, and the daughters should also provide for their old age.

You can think for yourself. Legally, it is necessary to provide for the elderly.

Hello, it is the responsibility of children to support their parents, their parents gave us life, gave birth to us and provided us with education, we should be grateful to our parents, good will be rewarded, God will favor good people.

You said that your daughter Teacher Yang takes care of it completely, usually he still occasionally buys him some things in his daily life, or gives him some pocket money, if it is occasionally buy him some things pocket money, I think it is normal, but if it is all things, my daughter does it, no.

Legal analysis: Parents give all their property to their sons and daughters also have to support their parents. It is the legal obligation of the child to support the parents, and this obligation is equally borne by the son and the daughter, and the daughter cannot fail to fulfill the maintenance obligation because the parents do not leave property for themselves.

If the parents do not fulfill the obligation to support them, the minor children or adult children who are unable to live independently have the right to demand that the parents pay child support.

Legal basis: Social Insurance Law of the People's Republic of China

Article 11 The basic endowment insurance shall be combined with social pooling and personal accounts. The basic endowment insurance is composed of employer and individual contributions, as well as subsidies.

Article 12 The employer shall pay the basic endowment insurance premiums in accordance with the proportion of the total wages of its employees stipulated by the state, which shall be credited to the basic endowment insurance pool. Employees shall pay basic pension insurance premiums in accordance with the proportion of their wages stipulated by the state, which shall be credited to their personal accounts. Individually-owned businesses without employees, part-time employees who have not participated in the basic pension insurance in the employer, and other flexibly employed persons who participate in the basic pension insurance shall pay the basic pension insurance premiums in accordance with the provisions of the state, which shall be credited to the basic pension insurance co-ordination and personal accounts respectively.

Article 13 Before the employees of state-owned enterprises and public institutions participate in the basic endowment insurance, the basic endowment insurance premiums that should be paid during the deemed payment period shall be borne by the first employee. When the basic endowment insurance is insufficient, it will be subsidized.