In the workplace, don t reason with the leader, because the leader is always right, do you think tha

Don't reason with your boss in the workplace, because the leader is always right", I think it's wrong. Leaders also make mistakes when they say that "the leader is always right", which is blind worship and is not in line with the facts. Leadership is human beings, not gods, and has cognitive limitations, and it is impossible to be omniscient and omnipotent.

Therefore, there are times when leaders see wrong, say wrong, and do wrong.

The reason that should be explained must be explained because leaders also make mistakes, so when they discover a leader's mistakes, they must properly point them out, explain the reason, and explain them clearly. If you don't say anything about mistakes, don't talk about what is reasonable, and blindly follow the leader, this is irresponsible to the leader, the work and yourself. Knowing that the mistake is still carried out, and allowing the wrong result to happen, this is harming the leader, mistaking the work, and may eventually implicate yourself.

It makes sense to say that this is a manifestation of responsibility and a sense of justice. Enlightened and wise leadership would be welcome.

It is okay to respect the decision-making and judgment rights of leaders and to be reasonable, but they cannot be argued. The leader is the person in charge of the workplace or the area in charge, has the decision-making power granted by the workplace system, and has the right to judge the rights and wrongs in the workplace. In order to enhance the efficiency of decision-making and prevent discussion without decision, when one's plan is inconsistent with the leader, obey the leader's decision-making.

Obedience at this time does not mean that the subordinates' plans are wrong, but that among the various feasible plans, they are implemented in accordance with the plans approved by the leader. In the same way, when there is a difference of opinion at work, the leader has the right to judge. This is also to prevent disagreement and disagreement.

When different viewpoints appear, in order to unify understanding and thinking, the leaders will eventually gather everyone's opinions and form a unified opinion, and if there are different opinions, they can only be retained. At this time, respecting the opinions of leaders does not mean that other people's views must be wrong, but workplace rules that are necessary in order to form a unified consciousness and work in unison. **,Click to identify the content The leader is responsible for his own decision-makingSome people say, the truth is taught, but the leader is wrong and does not listen to the advice of his subordinates, what should I do?

My advice is that, in general, you still listen to the leader. Why? Because, leaders are responsible for their own decisions.

The consequences of wrong decisions are borne by the leaders. Obedience is the norm, disobedience is the exception. On this basis, if the leadership makes a serious mistake that will have very serious consequences, or if it is clearly illegal, my suggestion is to stop arguing, but also suspend implementation.

You can immediately report to your superiors and actively seek external intervention to prevent serious consequences. This is a special case. It is believed that people in leadership positions have basic decision-making ability and judgment skills.

It is extremely rare for the leaders themselves to recognize the serious mistakes that have been pointed out by their subordinates.

Summary: Obedience to the leader is the basic attitude of subordinates. Mistakes in leadership should be discovered, properly pointed out, and reasoning should be clarified.

When it is discovered that a leader's decision-making is seriously wrong or clearly violates the law, it is necessary to have the courage and righteousness to uphold principles and effectively stop it. Leaders are not always right, and they still have to be reasonable. This is both to maintain leadership and to protect oneself.

I don't think so. The leader is indeed right, and the customer is indeed right, there is no doubt about this, because identity and status determine right and wrong, not your fault, but identity and status tell you that the definition of right and wrong is different between time and right occasion.

Why is leadership always right?

1.Different statuses look at problems from different angles.

For the same thing, the leader thinks more about the problem, just like the first and fifth floors, the scope of the view is different, and the problems found are different. Leadership decisions may not be entirely right, but at least they can see further and consider more issues. Individuals may think about just the work now, while leaders think about not only the work now, but also the direction of the future.

2.There is an information gap between superiors and subordinates.

There are various information gaps between superiors and subordinates, so they judge things differently. It is clear that the more information you have, the more comprehensive the leadership, the better the judgment of things. In the workplace, interests determine right and wrong, which is a very real problem, low cost and high return are the most correct choice, rather than blindly pursuing the so-called right and wrong.

Leaders can control more objective material conditions, so leaders can use these disposable material conditions to prove that their decisions and judgments are correct, and as a subordinate, even if you are right, but without the support of resources, it is difficult to prove whether your judgment is correct, even if there is support from resources, it is not necessarily correct.

4.Workplace rules: subordinates obey superiors.

The rule of the workplace is that the subordinates obey the superiors, and the individual obeys the collective, even if you are right, but disobedience is already a mistake, not to mention, the leader is responsible for the collective, and the subordinates are only responsible for themselves and the work. The subordinates are not necessarily wrong, but the leaders must be right. The subordinates do not obey the superiors, even if they are right, but in the end it is themselves who suffer, and they cannot prove whether they are right in the end.

I agree with the idea that "in the workplace, don't reason with your leader, because your leader is always right." Because from my personal work experience, most leaders are like this.

I work in the information implementation department of a company, and the content of the work is mostly dealt with business operators, because the general operation staff have different cultural levels, many employees are not aware of the benefits of informatization for the company, but simply consider from the complex procedures of personal work, so the cooperation procedures are relatively low.

When some implementers are hindered by the implementation of informatization and cannot play the corresponding implementation role, the leaders will be angry with them, thinking that the implementers are not attentive to their work, resulting in the progress of the project not keeping up with the rhythm and failing to achieve the expected results.

In the implementation of the project, there were two colleagues who were constantly praised by the leader because of their different personalities and working methods, and the other was criticized by the leader from time to time, and was full of complaints.

Xiao Yuan and Xiao Li are doing the same information implementation personnel, Xiao Yuan has a lively personality, good at communication, for any problems encountered in the implementation of the project, will from time to time to feedback to the leadership, and ask for help. For things that I can't make up my mind, I also estimate the time when the leader is in a good mood and report it.

And what about Xiao Li? It belongs to the old scalper type of employees, not good at talking, for the implementation of informatization, the effort is not less than Xiao Yuan, but because Xiao Li's way of working is to find a way to solve problems by himself, he did not report his progress to the leader in time, so that the leader has no understanding of Xiao Li's work.

Therefore, in the minds of the leaders, Xiao Li is an employee who does not work and cheats. When the leader arranges the work, Xiao Li will reason with the leader according to the actual situation of the project and the leadership theory, so that the leader thinks that Xiao Li is still an employee who does not obey the arrangement.

Later, the company had a promotion quota, and the leader recommended Xiao Yuan, who "will do things", and although Xiao Li, an old scalper, is the person who does the most work and works the most seriously, he can only continue to work in obscurity in his own job.

In the workplace, don't reason with the leader, because the leader is always right", mainly the following aspects of analysis:

1. The authority of leadership is inviolable.

From the point of view of respecting the leader, the leader has the idea of leadership, the focus is different, the consideration of the problem is different, if you as an employee, when the leader arranges the task, and the leader reason, is to be with the leader, the general leader, have their own authority, do not want employees to question their own decisions.

Second, the leader attaches the most importance to the respect of his subordinates.

Even if their decisions are wrong, they don't want their subordinates to reason with their face, which will make the leader feel that he has no status in the hearts of employees, and employees do not respect themselves.

It can be said that some of the views are correct.

1. It is true that you need to obey leaders in the workplace.

As far as the relationship between employees and leaders is concerned, the word "obedience" is correct.

The "obedience" mentioned here mainly refers to the final decision-making and instructions of the task, which must obey the arrangement of the leader.

It may be that in the eyes of employees, their own ideas are the best.

But we need to understand that the workplace relationship is not a family relationship, the workplace is first of all the employment relationship between the employee and the employer, and secondly, the managers represent the interests and authority of the employer.

It's normal to have differences of opinion at work, but employees should not fight with the leader to the end, if they have fully expressed their personal demands, and the leader still insists on his own opinion, then what you should do is to obey.

Second, leaders should also give employees the opportunity to express their demands.

From the perspective of business leaders, it is also necessary to give employees the opportunity to express their personal demands.

1.Although leaders have a sense of the overall situation and the height of enterprise management, they do not necessarily consider all issues in place.

A wise leader is willing to listen to the opinions of his subordinates, and seriously think about the feasibility and complementarity of these opinions, and ultimately help himself make better decisions.

2.Leaders give subordinates the opportunity to participate in management decision-making, which is a manifestation of democratic management.

Because when employees join a company, they need not only salary and learning improvement, but also the need to realize personal value and make suggestions for the company.

3.If the employees of the company have developed the atmosphere of "what the leader says, they will do it themselves", without thinking at all, I believe that over time, the company will inevitably lose its innovation and vitality, and at the same time, the employees will become very inert and have no desire to take the initiative to change.

Isn't this a lose-lose situation for both the company and the employee?

The circle culture in the workplace is broad and profound, and small groups cooperate with each other and compete with each other. The leader asks you to stand in line and choose, and follow the leader to "do bad things", such a thing is absolutely not to be done.

First, the same leader becomes a grasshopper on a rope, blessings can be shared, difficulties are difficult to share, leaders may make you a "back pot man" at any time, the so-called good things do not go out, bad things spread thousands of miles. Follow the leader to do "bad things", and you can grasp some of the core information of the leader in your hands. But you must not be complacent, thinking that you and the leader are grasshoppers on the same rope, and the leader will not dare to do anything to you in the future work.

Follow the leader to do "bad things", you may get temporary benefits, and you can also get the so-called trust of the leader, but you must know that such benefits, such trust are based on the common interests of you and the leaderOnce the situation breaks out one day, the leader will not think about you at all when he is unable to protect himself, and may bite you behind his back, or even become a "backstabber", but the leader is unscathed.

Second, follow the leader to do "bad things" in order to get the appreciation of the leader, which is essentially the team culture in the circle, forcing you to choose a small group of interests, otherwise you will be excluded and hit the circle culture in your workplace, including standing in the workplace, that is, you are required to choose a small group of interests, and fight openly and secretly with other small groups to maximize collective interests.

Side-lining culture abounds in the workplace, and it's even more serious in some companies. Some people want to remain neutral and not participate in the struggle of other interest groups, but this is actually very difficult to do. In the workplace, we will consciously or unconsciously interact with other people, and the network resources also depend on others to match, and it is really difficult to choose to remain neutral and alone.

Third, compliance with rules and discipline is the basic bottom line of life, this bottom line can not be lost, their own three views can not be destroyed, follow the leader to do "bad things" in order to get the appreciation of the leader is to destroy the culture of the three views, but their own three views can not be destroyed, the bottom line of being a man can not be lost.

Instead of following the leader to do "bad things", we should think about how to deal with such unreasonable demands from the leader.

Only by following the leader to do bad things in the workplace can you get the appreciation of the leader. I agree with that. Following the leader will make the leader feel that you are of the same mind as him.

If you work together, the leader will recognize you, will be willing to communicate with you, the leader will trust you, and will be willing to let you participate in everything.

This is not advisable, and it is well known that the leaders are fond of reversing some crooked ways. Because they do have windfall profits, but what about you? You can't mix the interests of the two jujubes, so you may take your own future, it's not worth it, it's likely that you followed a meal and became a backstabber, and people not only got the benefits, but also unharmed.

If you think about the office accountant in Shandong who worked with the leader and somehow got a loan of 90 million yuan, you will understand.

I particularly disagree with this. Because you and the leader cut everything, and then when someone says it's the autumn of abandonment, you won't feel particularly bad. In this company, it is still necessary to be a talent who has the ability to speak with strength, and will be cleaned up by the leader.