Which imperial mausoleum in China is disliked even by archaeological experts?

The Yongchang Mausoleum, the imperial mausoleum of Zhao Kuangyin, the pioneer of the Northern Song Dynasty, can be described as extremely "simple" and is very disliked by people！During the Northern Song Dynasty, there was an unwritten rule that the tombs of those in power would be built after their deaths. Every person in power enjoyed the glory and wealth during his lifetime and still wanted it after death, so most of their tombs would be magnificent, and there were many treasures, so the tomb robbers were born.

Archaeologists can be said to be almost the same as tomb robbers in some aspects, and they also have an unusual dedication to excavating imperial tombs. <>

After archaeologists heard about the Yongchang Mausoleum, they came here with historians, wanting to see the style of the Northern Song Dynasty pioneer mausoleum and the value of the cultural relics inside. YetWhen the imperial tomb was opened, they were greatly disappointed, because this mausoleum did not look like an emperor's mausoleum at all, not to mention that this was the pioneer of a generation of dynasties, and this ordinary "mausoleum" was no different from ordinary tombs。And the reason why this is so is because the rulers of the Northern Song Dynasty were worried that the mausoleums they had built in advance would be destroyed, so they did not bother to build the mausoleums during their lifetimes, and they were all built after their deaths.

Although Zhao Kuangyin's funeral treasures after his death are innumerable, there are really no valuable items in the tomb found by archaeologists now, and the only valuable thing may be the shrub statue. Experts speculate that this may have something to do with the construction of the mausoleum, which was built in such a hurry that many of the protections were not in place, so that tomb robbers could easily enter the tomb. <>

The only few stone statues that remain outside the mausoleum do not have much research value, so archaeologists and historical experts agree that the Yongchang Mausoleum has no scientific research value. Gradually, no scholars came to study the field, and tomb robbers stopped patronizing it. Today, the Yongchang Mausoleum is a wasteland, and the statues have become children's toys for them to play and use.

Zhao Kuangyin's imperial mausoleum Yongchang Mausoleum, his imperial mausoleum can be described by two words: shabby.

Zhao Kuangyin's imperial mausoleum, Yongchang Mausoleum, how to say that Zhao Kuangyin is also the founding emperor of the Northern Song Dynasty, but his own mausoleum is disliked by archaeologists because it is too simple, and is known as the most shabby imperial mausoleum in China.

Wu Zetian's tomb, because there is no text on Wu Zetian's tombstone, and there are few burial goods in the tomb, so the scientific research value is relatively low.

There were many ancient dynasties in our country, and there were many emperors. There are still undiscovered emperors' tombs, and there are still many undiscovered imperial tombs, and the discovered imperial tombs have not been excavated for various reasons. The following is an overview of the imperial tombs that have not been stolen and those that have been stolen.

Which imperial tombs have not been stolen:

1, Qianling-Tang Gaozong Li Zhi and Wu Zetian's joint burial tomb. 2, Qiaoling - the tomb of Li Dan of Tang Ruizong.

3, Qin Shi Huang's mausoleum did not dare to dig, after archaeological experts many times of exploration, coupled with satellite remote sensing, the first emperor's mausoleum did have a large amount of mercury, which is similar to the historical books in the rumors that Qin Shi Huang made rivers with mercury in his own mausoleum, and made the sun and moon with gold and silver. Mercury is known to be a highly toxic liquid that can cause death and deter tomb robbers.

4, Qing Dynasty: Xiaoling (Shunzhi), Qing Fuling (Nurhachi), Qing Zhaoling (Huang Taiji), Qing Tailing (Yongzheng), Qing Changling (Jiaqing), Qing Muling (Daoguang). 5, Ming Dynasty:

The imperial tombs are in Beijing and Nanjing, these two places were brought down by the Qing Dynasty, and the Qing Dynasty has protected the cultural relics very well, and now they are basically intact.

6. The mausoleum of Zhu Yuanzhang in the Ming Dynasty has not been stolen. Historians have used high-tech means to detect nothing, and can only prove that the tomb has not been stolen. What excites archaeologists is the discovery of some human bones in the southwest corner of the mausoleum, but because of the small number, it does not look like a burial pit.

7. The imperial tombs of the Xia Dynasty have not been discovered due to their age and lack of written records. 8, the Shang Dynasty from Tang Liguo to Pangeng, a total of nineteen kings (except Tang), these imperial tombs have no historical records, so far have not been discovered. 9. The Wei, Jin, Southern and Northern Dynasties were a troubled era in China, and due to the short period of national rule, it has not been discovered so far.

10. Cao Cao's tomb has always been known for its seventy-two doubtful graves, and many fake tombs have been built to cover up the location of his tomb, so it has not been found yet.

11, the Yuan Dynasty emperor - Genghis Khan's mausoleum is unknown, Genghis Khan died in 1227 during the expedition to Western Xia, and his whereabouts after his death have become a mystery for the ages. 12. There are not many records of the imperial tombs of the Liao-Jin Dynasty, and most of them may be in the northeast region, which has not been found so far. 13, Liu Bei's mausoleum is in the Wuhou Temple in Chengdu, which may be fake.

Stolen mausoleums :

1. The earliest mausoleum in the history of our country that recorded the stolen era was the home of the first king of the Shang Dynasty about 3600 years ago, and it was first stolen and excavated in the late Western Zhou Dynasty in 2770. 2. In 1956, the Dingling Tomb of Ming-Zhu Yijun Shenzong and Emperor Wanli was excavated by the state, which was the only excavation of the Emperor's Mausoleum since the founding of New China. 3. The ancestral tomb of the Ming Dynasty was robbed by the rebel army.

4. The Qing Dynasty emperor's tomb was stolen, and it was the most famous thief of Sun Dianying, and the tomb of Cixi was ransacked. There are also Kangxi Jingling and Guangxu's Chongling have been stolen.

As of February 2019, the following imperial tombs have not yet been excavated.

1. Mausoleum of Qin Shi Huang.

The Mausoleum of Qin Shi Huang is one of the largest, most peculiar and richest imperial tombs in the world.

Because the current science and technology are not developed enough to better protect cultural relics, the State Administration of Cultural Heritage has long made clear regulations - not to take the initiative to excavate the emperor's tombs. Therefore, the tomb of Qin Shi Huang has not been excavated.

2. Qianling, the joint burial tomb of Tang Gaozong Li Zhi and Wu Zetian.

Qianling is the most well-preserved main tomb in the Eighteen Tombs of the Tang Dynasty, and it is also the only one in the Tang Tombs that has not been stolen. Qianling is also the only Tang Dynasty emperor mausoleum that has not been stolen and excavated for thousands of years, and its underground palace road number lettering stone has been discovered, unearthed with thin waist iron tie plate, tin iron ingot, etc., with the unique ** value that the general mausoleum does not have.

3. The emperor's mausoleum of the Yuan Dynasty.

Because the Mongolian people prevail in "secret burial", and after the death of the emperor of the Yuan Dynasty, he was buried in the valley of the north of the desert, according to the customs of the Mongolian people, buried on the ground, and there are no hills and ground buildings, so the mausoleum site is difficult to find so far. Even the famous Genghis Khan's mausoleum is only Genghis Khan's mound of clothes, and where the real Genghis Khan's mausoleum is is always a mystery.

There is no need to excavate. In theory, the discovery of any archaeological remains does not necessarily mean that they must be excavated, and this is also true in practice. At present, the basic policy of cultural relics work is "protection first, rescue first."

1. Rational use and strengthening management". The imperial tombs are even more special, and "not taking the initiative to excavate the tombs of the emperors" is still a basic policy of cultural relics and archaeological work.

In 1987, the State Council issued the Notice on Further Strengthening the Work of Cultural Relics. The "Notice" proposed: "Due to the neglect of the protection of cultural relics in the construction of capital construction, many underground cultural relics have been damaged.

In order to properly solve the contradiction between the protection of cultural relics and the production and construction, in the future, infrastructure projects should avoid cultural relics protection units, cultural relics protection areas or underground cultural relics rich in areas as much as possible; Second, if there is a special need to select sites for construction in these places, the consent of the cultural relics department and the urban and rural construction planning department must be obtained in advance; Third, the cultural relics department should organize forces to carry out investigation, exploration and archaeological excavation within the scope of the project in advance." In view of the increasing number of active excavation plans reported by various localities, the "Circular" specifically proposed: "For a long time to come, the archaeological work of the cultural relics department should mainly cooperate with the capital construction.

Archaeological excavations must be carried out in strict accordance with the approval procedures. For important ancient tombs and ancient sites that do not hinder the construction of infrastructure, they are generally not excavated when the current unearthed cultural relics protection technology has not been completely passed." The stipence in the circular on not taking the initiative to excavate important ancient tombs has actually clarified the basic idea of not actively excavating the emperor's tombs.

In 1997, the State Council issued the Circular on Strengthening and Improving the Work of Cultural Relics. The "Circular" once again reiterates that the archaeological excavation of cultural relics should adhere to the basic policy of focusing on cooperating with capital construction, especially in coordinating with the archaeological exploration, investigation and excavation of large-scale capital construction projects. At the same time, it was emphasized that archaeological excavations for scientific research should give full consideration to the needs of conservation work, strengthen unified management, and strictly examine and approve the system.

The "Notice" made it clear for the first time: "Due to the lack of scientific and technological and means for the protection of cultural relics, the active excavation of large-scale imperial tombs will not be carried out for the time being."

The Mausoleum of Qin Shi Huang has not been found to be stolen and excavated, as if the Qianling Tomb has not been stolen.

The only imperial tomb in Chinese history that has not been stolen is the imperial tomb of Genghis Khan. So far, it has not been found.

Hello, there are 3 that have not been stolen: 1 Qianling, 2 Mausoleum of Qin Shi Huang, 3, Tomb of Genghis Khan (not found so far).

Seongbuk Middle School used to be OK.

Now it's a bit chaotic, of course, Changsha Good Middle School is much better than Ningxiang, so I can't see if I can get in, and No. 1 Middle School is generally the best.

There are also Yale-in-China, Changjun, Mingde, etc.

There are also experiments in Ningxiang, Yutan, etc.

The probability of going to Chengbei to get into the first high school is not large, but your own efforts are the most important thing.

Because the current archaeological technology in China is not mature enough, it is impossible to guarantee that the unearthed cultural relics will not be damaged due to changes in light, humidity, temperature and so on. In addition, the underground palace of the Mausoleum of Qin Shi Huang is very deep, more than 100 meters from the ground, and the excavation process may encounter the danger of collapse.

Legal basis: Article 324 of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China Whoever intentionally destroys precious cultural relics protected by the State or cultural relics that have been designated as national key cultural relics protection units or provincial-level cultural relics protection units shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years or short-term detention and/or a fine; where the circumstances are severe, the sentence is between three and ten years imprisonment and a concurrent fine.

Anyone who intentionally destroys places of interest or historic sites protected by the state, and the circumstances are serious, is to be sentenced to up to five years imprisonment or short-term detention, and is to be concurrently stared at or fined.

Anyone who negligently destroys precious cultural relics under the protection of the State or that have been designated as national key cultural relics protected units or provincial-level cultural relics protected units, and the creation and acquisition of them causes serious consequences, shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years or short-term detention.