Now I want to buy a digital camera, which is cost effective and suitable for home use

Updated on number 2024-06-10
3 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    To have excellent imaging and rich hands: Canon and Fujifilm, these two brands are strong, and the image quality of Canon cameras in particular is among the best, and the workmanship is not lazy and slippery. Like the Canon 860 with wide angle, the one is very good, and the picture quality has nothing to say,**2800 or so。

    To be fashionable: Sony and Casio, these two brands have been making fashion cameras for many years, and they have a lot of technology and experience. Like Sony's T100 and Casio's S880 are good! The T100 is about 2600, and the S800 is about 2000 yuan.

    For entertainment: lock in Samsung. At present, the best camera for entertainment is Samsung! There are many voices and horses, and there are many functions, so other aspects can only be accommodated. I don't recommend it for families!

    Cost-effective: The concept of cost-effective is relatively vague, the appearance is good, the performance is good, and there are trendy concepts such as wide-angle and anti-shake, and it is still Panasonic. Panasonic's camera is not expensive, and the performance is good. But the fashion alone is not as good as Sony, and the picture quality is still not as good as Canon!

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    Good home Samsung,Recommend SamsungNV3,Practical and beautiful,NV3 function,In addition to shooting**,Additional functions such as video,E-reading,Listen to songs,Watch movies,It's all good。 In addition, the highlight of this model is that the macro shooting and night scene functions are particularly good. It is also ultra-thin and very small.

    It is very simple to use, there are many shooting modes, and it is very suitable for people who do not have particularly high professional requirements, in addition, the shape is small and beautiful, very thin, and the black one is also very textured, and it is very cheap, below 2000.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    1. Sony A6000, A6300

    Sony's mirrorless has always done a relatively good job, and its mirrorless products are definitely the conscience of the industry, and its cost performance is very high. I mainly recommend two Sony products, a Sony A6000, a Sony A6300, these two products I personally think are Sony products with good cost performance. These two mirrorless models are very good in terms of focusing speed, continuous shooting speed, and capturing shots.

    In fact, the sales of Sony A6300 were not good when it was first launched, and it was only later that Sony launched A6500, and the sales of A6300 began to rise. I guess I didn't compare it at the beginning, I don't know, when Sony launched the A6500, everyone knew how cost-effective the A6300 was, so the sales of the A6300 increased.

    The biggest surprise to me was that the Sony A6300 was equipped with 4K** shooting, which not only provided oversampled 4K (25p 100Mbps) and upgraded HD (120p 120Mbps), but also S-log3 gamma curve. Compared with those ** higher mirrorless mirrors, Sony A6300 is really good.

    Summary:If you simply take pictures,A6300 and A6500 are not cost-effective,A6000It's still okay,After all, Sony's positioning for A6300、A6500 is mainly to improve the best ability。

    Second, Panasonic G7

    Panasonic Lumix G7 should be regarded as the most cost-effective kind of 4K camera, some people may think that this camera can not use many lenses, but I tell you to buy a micro single is for daily shooting, not for movie advertising, enough.

    First of all, the Panasonic Lumix G716 million pixels are absolutely enough for everyday shooting. In addition, its focus mode also includes face recognition and automatic tracking, which is quite good. In addition, the Lumix 4K** can shoot at a standard 24 25fps with very sharp image quality.

    Summary: The advantage of this micro mirror is that it is low, as long as it is about 2000 yuan, and there are some relatively good functions. But there are some drawbacks, such as poor battery life, slow autofocus, and inaccurate display of colors on the camera screen.

    But after thinking about it for a while, it's still acceptable to have these shortcomings.

Related questions
8 answers2024-06-10

Dizzy, torture is more recommended, but you will be even more confused. >>>More

6 answers2024-06-10

Update Reply: Nice! What is discontinued is not necessarily bad. But there are many people who buy good things that have been discontinued, and there are naturally more refurbished machines! CJ987A, got it?! >>>More

2 answers2024-06-10

Don't go to Suning or Gome to buy a camera.

It is very expensive and 3% more expensive than the average dealer. >>>More

8 answers2024-06-10

One. Buy a camera or buy a professional brand, don't think that Sony is professional, he is just a digital product with a professional, but not including cameras, now big brands can enter an industry as long as they have a little technology to make money, and there are only a few really professional Canon, Kodak, Nikon, Fujifilm only a few!! >>>More

6 answers2024-06-10

At home, you can take a look at the Samsung i8, which is an ultra-thin card machine, with a very small body and easy to carry. And there are a lot of functions,You can record small short films,With mp4,*** function,The only thing is electronic image stabilization,3X optical zoom,The pixels are also quite high,8 million,I personally think that the average household is 600-8 million pixels are about the same,I also use Samsung's camera,It feels quite practical,Imaging is not as exaggerated as some people say,At least I sent a lot**Everyone said it was very good,Look at the samples on the Internet and think i8The effect is very good。 i8There is also a world travel guide function and a face recognition function,**The effect is relatively good,It is very clear to watch on TV。