-
Of course not. According to our common sense understanding, one of the central issues of the American Civil War was the emancipation of black slaves. Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation in the second year of the war, and the black slave question should have been solved, and the Amendment had already secured the citizenship of the Negro.
But the reality is far from the same. If we look at Tocqueville's "On Democracy in America", we will know that his understanding is very profound: the legal emancipation of blacks (in the United States at that time) made the treatment of blacks more miserable at the social level.
How do you say that? Discrimination against people is largely innate, and the more blacks are liberated by the law and become theoretically free people, the more white people think, "How can you be the same as me?" ”
So the actual problem, although the blacks in the North at that time were free blacks, in the course of the Civil War, the position of blacks in the American North became worse and worse. From the end of the Civil War to the American civil rights movement in the 50s of the 20th century, the entire 80 years are known as the "80 years of black oblivion" in the current constitutional history. Everyone thought the black problem was solved; The Civil War led directly to the great expansion of capitalism in the United States after 1870, and the black question disappeared completely.
In addition, after the American Civil War, blacks had the right to vote in the constitution, but in the social sense, as a social being, blacks were still at the bottom. And not only that, but after the emancipated southern black slaves arrived in the north, their social status was still the lowest.
-
Obviously not, the hateful American imperialism is unbearable at any time.
-
No, it was Lincoln who liberated them later.
-
No, racial discrimination cannot be changed by a single decree, just like the Chinese nationalists, who smashed cars and beat up compatriots, just look at them to know the problem of racial discrimination in the United States.
-
First, territorial expansion has exacerbated the contradictions between the two economic systems of the North and the South. After the founding of the United States, it actively pursued a policy of large-scale territorial expansion.
Second, the abolitionist movement fueled the outbreak of war. An important manifestation of the sharp contradiction between the North and the South in the social system is the upsurge of the abolitionist movement.
Third, the struggle for control of the federation has exacerbated the existing contradictions between the North and the South. According to the provisions of the U.S. Constitution, the U.S. Senate.
It consisted of two representatives from each state, so whether the newly formed states in the West became free states or slave states directly determined the question of who would control the Senate between the North and the South.
Fourth, Lincoln.
Elected to the United States became the Civil War.
-
The reason for Genzhou's limb: The contradiction between the two economic systems is irreconcilable.
Significance: The American Civil War abolished slavery, maintained the unity of the country, cleared another obstacle to the development of capitalism, and created conditions for the rapid development of the capitalist economy in the future.
-
The American Civil War was the second bourgeois revolution in American history, and the fundamental cause of the provoking Sun was that the severe chain of plantation slavery hindered the development of the capitalist economy. The focus of the contradiction is the question of the survival and abolition of black slavery!
-
Yes, if the capitalist countries have the impetus to hinder development, civil war will happen sooner or later.
Reasons: 1. Culture conflict. Industrialization developed in the north. >>>More
The famous battle and major event of the American Civil War: the Civil War. >>>More
The United States learned how to prevent civil war from the Civil War, and the Americans did it. One of the reasons for this was the tolerance of Grant at the moment of victory, in which he sacrificed his personal honor to win the permanent peace of a country. There are no official textbooks in the United States, no official censorship is required for the publication of historical works, and no one has the right to force the nation to indoctrinate a certain answer that is considered to be the only correct one. >>>More
The confrontation between the North and the South. The North was dominated by the emerging bourgeoisie, and the South was dominated by the hacienda slave-owning class. The northern bourgeoisie hoped that by abolishing the slave treaties, slaves would be freed and thus obtain enough free labor for industrial production; The South, on the other hand, advocated non-abolition and wanted to take control of the efforts and provide the necessary labor for the development of its estates, so there was a disagreement, which then developed into war. >>>More
Civil war. Generally speaking, civil wars can be boring, and hum is no exception. Specifically, the HUM Civil War has two main lines. >>>More