Using the historical evolution of the concept of the state as a clue, I will talk about my views on

On the basis of several powerful countries with their own characteristics and different types, a consensus on peace was reached.

Throughout history, the situation of one dominant country has often led to the emergence of world hegemony, and hegemonic countries have often treated other countries with their own values and worldview. This is true in Britain and the United States, and it is also true in the former Soviet Union. Comparatively speaking, weaker countries have very little say.

The former Soviet Union sent troops to Afghanistan and the United States attacked the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and Iraq.

Some regions are all powerful countries, and they will not have a positive effect on regional stability. At the beginning of the 20th century, there were many great powers in Europe, but there was no consensus on the distribution of benefits, which led to two world wars. The relations between countries are often sandwiched with the primitive factors of the distribution of interests, and the so-called political views, cultural concepts, and religious traditions are all floating clouds.

If the country is strong enough and has enough right to speak, it is often a bargaining chip for the interests of the country.

In today's world, the pattern has emerged, and the Confucian circle in East Asia and South Asia led by China has gradually taken shape, but there are many internal contradictions; The Russian-dominated political circle of Eastern Europe-Central Asia is on the verge of disintegration, but with Russia's revival, the future is uncertain. The Arab world in the Middle East lacks a strong country as a representative, and has always been scattered and bullied by Israel; Latin American countries belong to the backyard of the United States and are in a similar situation to the Arab world; Africa's problem is that it has no leader and is slow to develop; The Western European world, led by Britain and Germany, has strong economic strength, but there are still a large number of problems within each country; The United States is now the world's only superpower, and although it has declined in the past two years, the emaciated camel is bigger than the horse.

Today's consensus on peace can only be said to be the beginning of the emergence of peace, everyone knows that we want peace, but there is no consensus on the understanding of peace, is it peace in the United States, peace in Western Europe, peace in the Arab world, or peace in Africa and Latin America? There are different opinions, and they all argue on the basis of reason. In my humble opinion, peace in all regions should be taken care of is a complex task, and peace requires the joint efforts of all countries, and on the basis of development and under the framework of the United Nations, different types of powerful countries will have the same right to speak, and only then will it be possible for peace to reach certain consensus on the basis of the balance of power.

Haha, human geography exam, I can't find the answer, in fact, I can't find it, which major are you, landlord, it's better to give me the score, everyone give me no answer.

It was Marx who put it forward. Because the situation was turbulent at that time. And many people are in the midst of fire and water, so he put forward this idea.

Peace and development are the main themes of today's world, and this assertion was put forward by ***.

This theory was put forward by the leaders of our country, and it is also for the purpose of better promoting world peace. It is also to better promote the development of the world.

The person who put forward the theory is the leader of the country, and it is because of the emergence of such a theory that social peace can be better promoted. in order to better promote social development.

1. What does the strategy of peaceful evolution mean?

2. The essence of the strategy of peaceful evolution.

3. What is the key to the West's strategy of peaceful evolution?

4. What is the way in which peaceful evolution belongs to the evolution of the international strategic pattern?

1.The strategy of peaceful evolution is a strategy that goes beyond containment and is not adopted by different countries in order to bring about changes in the system of the other country.

2.Peaceful evolution is a non-violent process of derivative change.

3.The term appeared during the Cold War in the 50s and 60s after World War II, and was proposed by U.S. Congressman Dulles in the early 50s of the 20th century.

4.In the international communist movement, it was the leader who first sensed the danger of the strategy of peaceful evolution and called on the Communists to fight against this danger.

Subverting the regimes of other ethnic groups and countries by non-military means.

Achieve the goal of "surrendering the army without a fight".

Including all non-military means such as cultural invasion, economic infiltration, and ideological assimilation.

After the end of World War II, with the emergence of the socialist camp, the breaking of the nuclear monopoly of the United States, and the emergence of two major military blocs, NATO and the Warsaw Pact, the Cold War period of unprecedented scale began.

Politicians in Western countries realize that not only will it be difficult to defeat the socialist countries through a "hot war" with real guns, but also that the cost of such a war will be difficult for the Western countries themselves to bear.

As a result, a group of Western politicians and diplomats, represented by Dulles and Kennan, put forward a strategy of "peaceful evolution" of socialist countries.

They are trying to influence and transform the thinking of the people of the socialist countries, especially the young people of the second and third generations, through contacts with the socialist countries and with the Western values, ideology, and way of life, so that the socialist countries will gradually become harmless to capitalism and gradually evolve into a "free world" like the West.

The 13th National Congress of the Communist Party of China (CPC) put forward peace and development as "the theme of the times".

In May 1984, *** proposed: There are many problems in the world now, and two problems are more prominent. The first is the issue of peace, and the second is the issue of the North-South, and the North-South issue is the issue of development.

In October 1984, it was further clarified that the two issues have a bearing on the overall situation and have global and strategic significance. The 13th National Congress of the Communist Party of China (CPC) stated that "peace and development are the main themes of the contemporary world".

The 14th, 15th, and 16th National Congresses of the Communist Party of China all confirmed it. The thesis that peace and development are the main themes of the times reflects the fundamental changes and main characteristics of the overall international situation and provides a theoretical basis for China's reform and opening up.

Under the guidance of this thesis, China has abandoned the slogan of "taking class struggle as the key link" and put forward the idea of "taking economic construction as the central task," carried out reform and opening up, and determined the strategic decision of concentrating forces on socialist modernization. It has improved its relations with the United States and the Soviet Union, and has won a favorable international environment for China's domestic construction and opening up to the outside world.

30. The assertion that "peace and development are the main themes of the contemporary world" was formally put forward for the first time in the report.

a Eleventh National Congress of the Communist Party of China.

b Twelfth National Congress of the Communist Party of China.

c 13th National Congress of the Communist Party of China.

d Answer to the 14th National Congress of the Communist Party of China c

1. Peace is a prerequisite for normal economic development. Only social stability and world peace can ensure sound and rapid economic development;

2. Development, in turn, promotes peace. Only when society develops, the people's living standards improve, everyone does not have to worry about food and clothing, and has their own work, will the society be naturally peaceful.

As the saying goes, stability is the premise, development is the goal, and reform is the driving force.

Peace is the premise and guarantee of development, and development is the result and embodiment of peace.

Peace and development are mutually reinforcing: world peace is a prerequisite for promoting the common development of all countries, and there can be no development without peace;

The development of all countries is an important foundation for maintaining world peace.