Why is it so difficult to see effective collaboration in companies surrounded by elite people?

When we communicate, as a speaker, we take it for granted that the other person knows what we are saying, and as an obedient person, we take it for granted that I understand what the other person is saying. But the reality is that we often have misunderstandings. Therefore, at the beginning of the conversation, each other should first confirm the purpose and significance of the communication.

The speaker should explain in a simple, straightforward manner, and the listener should confirm in the opposite direction if necessary. Otherwise, we will have to go back and forth to confirm the theme of the communication activity in the process of communication.

When communicating, it is very easy to unconsciously base your thoughts on the assumption that I am right and you are wrong. Such an assumption will shift their focus and draw communication to the "who's right and who's wrong" arguments, and ignore the difficult points of finding the cause of their differences.

In fact, it doesn't matter who is right and who is wrong, as long as we start arguing about this situation, we are both wrong. Since both of them have gone against the original purpose of communication: to solve difficulties.

Most people feel very depressed when working with others, because they often invest a lot of time and effort and make little progress. Cooperation is a certain kind of fusion of different methods and ideas. Everyone needs to use work experience, judgment and habit, but these factors are different, which is of course a huge network resource that can provide a variety of ideas and methods, but this difference is also a kind of pressure, which usually reduces the efficiency of everyone's work together.

When people work together, the hours are often wasted in friction: they are assigned tasks that are very different from their abilities, or they are in conflict because of certain differences.

Although we have always said that the combination of strength and beauty can be stronger, but the fact is sometimes not necessarily so, many leaders in a certain field have their own unique rules of work and behavior, and do not want to generalize with others, and even their personalities are also very persistent. This is what we often say that literati are light, and they all think that they are the best, and others are not as good as one in ten thousand, and they have a strong offensive ability. The law of crowd evolution pays more attention to unity and cooperation, rather than individual ability, and it is sometimes an inconvenience to have more capable people.

The reason is simple, because the managers of the team lack enough "diversity team" thinking, and the group of good but not diverse people gathered in a team can easily form two problems that can have a major impact on the team's decision-making ability and productivity

Because they all have their own ideas, it is difficult to reach an agreement, they do not complement each other, and no one convinces anyone.

Because everyone's ideas are different, even if they get together, it is difficult to have a particularly high tacit understanding and cooperation.